This changeset rewrites the change tracking logic of histedit to record every
operation it does. Tracked operations record the full list of "old" node that
will eventually be removed to the list of new nodes that replace it. Operations
on temporary nodes are tracked too. Dropped changesets are also recorded as an
"old" node replacement by nothing. This logic is similar to the obsolescence
marker one and will be used for this purpose in later commit.
This new logic implies a big amount of change in the histedit code base.
histedit action functions now always return a tuple of
(new-ctx, [list of rewriting operations])
The old `created`, `replaced` and `tmpnodes` are no longer returned and stored
during histedit operation. When such information is necessary it is computed
from the replacement graph. This computation is done in the `processreplacement`
function.
The `replacemap` is also dropped. It is computed at the end of the command from the
graph. The `bootstrapcontinue` methods are altered to compute this different kind of
information.
This new mechanism requires much less information to be written on disk.
Note:
This changes allows a more accurate bookmark movement. bookmark on dropped
changeset are now move of their parent (or replacement of their parent)
instead of their children.
This fix issue3582
We are now checking for any changesets between the previous `parentctx` and the
current working directory parent. If the current working directory parent is
inconsistent, we abort.
This change is useful as it simplifies the --continue process, easing upcoming
changes.
While working on this changeset, I spotted an unhandled corner case. This corner
case is now documented and have an appropriate issue in the tracker (issue3655).
However, the corner case is still unhandled. handling this test case would
required some additional work:
- actually decide what the proper behavior should be:
- change content of "histedit-state" to add missing data necessary to detect
the situation
- add proper testcase,
But leaving the case unhandled is "okay":
- this is not a regression,
- this is not the purpose of the current series,
- the freeze was near and I had more critical stuff to attend to,
- this is a simple but non trivial, (see above)
When histedit "continue", there is several complicated logic to apply in order to
detect intermediate changeset and concluded pending operation.
This changeset extract this logic in a dedicated function to lighten the main
one. No alteration to the logic is done.
Create a function dedicated to stripping a group of node. All existing
duplicated code is replaced by call to this function.
This new function take care of stripping known and relevant node only.
The old and fragile patching logic is replaced by smart merges (as rebase and
graft do). This should prevents some conflicts and smoother human resolution.
For this purpose the "foldchanges" function is renamed to "applychanges" and
handle a single revision only.
Update the folding code to works in memory instead of applying patches on the
working directory. This is cleaner, faster and prepare the removal of the whole
patching logic.
This new collapse function will probably move into core sooner or later. A lot
of other rewriting operation may benefit from it.
This patch is the first step towards a refactoring of the histedit
extension to use underlying graft machinery instead of diff/patch as
discussed in issue3527. Replacing diff/patch with graft is necessary
to fix, for example, issue3582.
"i18n.gettext()" invocation for "editcomment" itself should have
little impact for whole initialization cost of histedit, because it is
already invoked for initialization of the command table entry.
'\n\n' has to be added to the text being edited separately from
"editcomment", because leading 'line feed' characters are not exported
to "hg.pot" file correctly.
Before this patch, updating statistics line appears at the bottom of
the examples describing rules to edit history.
But such line never appear in the file describing rules while
histedit-ing, so this patch removes that line from the examples.
When running the following actions:
pick 617f94f13c0f 1 +4
drop 888f9082bf99 2 +5
fold 251d831eeec5 3 +6
if the fold fails, is fixed by the user with a new changeset, --continue
will ignore the new revision when generating the fold changelog. This
was caused by --continue detecting new changesets as descendants of the
parent not descendants of changesets in the initial list. In this case,
dropped changesets must be ignored.
Even with the computation fixed, the 'newchildren' list was always
emptied by the filtering loop and passed empty to finishfold().
Note that changesets dropped and recreated identically will still be
missed. This probably cannot be solved but is unlikely to happen.
Other things, like 'newchildren' having multiple heads, should be
checked as well.
This introduces a peer method into all repository classes, which currently
simply returns self. It also changes hg.repository so it now raises an
exception if the supplied paths does not resolve to a localrepo or descendant.
Finally, all call sites are changed to use the peer and local methods as
appropriate, where peer is used whenever the code is dealing with a remote
repository (even if it's on local disk).