dict.items() returned a list on Python 2 and whereas on Python 3 it returns a
view object. So we required a work around. Using dict.update() is better then
constructing lists as it should save us on gc churns.
Previously `c2` may had an incorrect linkrev because getsrcfctx set wrong
_descendantrev. getsrcfctx() sets descendant rev equals to srcctx.rev() (see
_makegetfctx()), but for `c2` descendant rev should be dstctx. While we were
lucky it didn't broke copytracing it made it significantly slower in some
cases. Besides it broke some external extensions, for example remotefilelog.
Previously the added/modified placeholder hash for manifests generated from the
dirstate was a 21byte long string consisting of the p1 file hash plus a single
character to indicate an add or a modify. Normal hashes are only 20 bytes long.
This makes it complicated to implement more efficient manifest implementations
which rely on the hashes being fixed length.
Let's change this hash to just be 20 bytes long, and rely on the astronomical
improbability of an actual hash being these 20 bytes (just like we rely on no
hash every being the nullid).
This changes the possible behavior slightly in that the hash for all
added/modified entries in the dirstate manifest will now be the same (so simple
node comparisons would say they are equal), but we should never be doing simple
node comparisons on these nodes even with the old hashes, because they did not
accurately represent the content (i.e. two files based off the same p1 file
node, with different working copy contents would have the same hash (even with
the appended character) in the old scheme too, so we couldn't depend on the
hashes period).
Previously the new-node placeholder hash for manifests generated from the
dirstate was a 21byte long string of "!" characters. Normal hashes are only 20
bytes long. This makes it complicated to implement more efficient manifest
implementations which rely on the hashes being fixed length.
Let's change this hash to just be 20 bytes long, and rely on the astronomical
improbability of an actual hash being 20 "!" bytes in a row (just like we rely
on no hash ever being the nullid).
A future diff will do this for added and modified dirstate markers as well, so
we're putting the new newnodeid in node.py so there's a common place for these
placeholders.
This is a fix for a regression introduced by the patches for issue4028.
The test changes are due to us doing fewer _checkcopies searches now, which
makes some test outputs revert to the pre-issue4028 behavior. That issue itself
remains fixed, we only skip copy tracing for files where it isn't relevant.
As a nice side effect, this makes copy detection much faster when tracing
backwards through lots of renames.
When working in a rotated DAG (for a graftlike merge), there can be files
that are renamed both between the base and the topological CA, and between
the TCA and the endpoint farther from the base. Such renames span the TCA
(and thus need both passes of _checkcopies to be fully detected), but may
not necessarily be divergent.
Make _checkcopies return "incomplete copies" and "incomplete divergences"
in this case, and let mergecopies recombine them once data from both passes
of _checkcopies is available.
With this patch, all known cases involving renames and grafts pass.
(Developed together with Pierre-Yves David)
As the two _checkcopies passes' ranges are separated by tca, not base,
only one of the two passes will actually encounter the base.
Pass "remotebase" to the other pass to let it know not to expect passing
over the base. This is required for handling a few unusual rename cases.
We first combine incomplete copies on the two sides of the topological CA
into complete copies.
Any leftover incomplete copies are then combined with the incomplete
divergences to reconstruct divergences spanning over the topological CA.
Finally we promote any divergences falsely flagged as incomplete to full
divergences.
Right now, there is nothing generating incomplete copy/divergence data,
so this code does nothing. Changes to _checkcopies to populate these
dicts are coming later in this series.
During a graftlike merge, _checkcopies runs from ctx to tca, possibly
passing over the merge base. If there is a rename both before and after
the base, then we're actually dealing with divergent renames.
If there is no rename on the other side of tca, then the divergence is
contained entirely in the range of one _checkcopies invocation, and
should be detected "in the loop" without having to rely on the other
_checkcopies pass.
The algorithm of _checkcopies can only walk backwards in the DAG, never
forward. Because of this, the two _checkcopies patches need to run from
their respective endpoints to the TCA to cover the entire subgraph where
the merge is being performed. However, detection of files new in both
endpoints, as well as directory rename detection, need to run with respect
to the merge base, so we need lists of new files both from the TCA's and
the merge base's viewpoint to correctly detect renames in a graft-like
merge scenario.
(Series reworked by Pierre-Yves David)
This introduces a distinction between "merge base" and
"topological common ancestor". During a regular merge, these two are
identical. Graft, however, performs a merge in a rotated DAG, where the
merge base will not be a common ancestor at all in the
original DAG.
To correctly find copies in case of a graft, we need to take both the
merge base and the topological CA into account, and track any renames
between them in reverse. Fortunately we can detect this in advance,
see comment in the code about "backwards".
This patch only supports finding non-divergent renames contained entirely
between the merge base and the topological CA. Further patches are coming
to support more complex cases.
(Pierre-Yves David was involved in the cleanup of this patch.)
Right now, nothing changes as a result of this, but we want to handle
grafts differently from ordinary merges later.
(Series developed together with Pierre-Yves David)
When grafting a copy backwards through a rename, a copy is wrongly detected,
which causes the graft to be applied inappropriately, in a destructive way.
Make sure that the old file name really exists in the common ancestor,
and bail out if it doesn't.
This fixes the aggravated case of bug 5343, although the basic issue
(failure to duplicate the copy information) still occurs.
This variable was named after the common ancestor. It is actually the merge
base that might differ from the common ancestor in the graft case. We rename the
variable before a larger refactoring to clarify the situation. Similar rename
was also applied to 'checkcopies' in a prior changeset.
The 'movewithdir' had a lot of related logic all around the 'mergecopies'.
However it is actually never containing anything until the very last loop in
that function. We move the (simplified) variable definition there for clarity
This variable was named after the common ancestor. It is actually the merge
base that might differ from the common ancestor in the graft case. We rename the
variable before a larger refactoring to clarify the situation.
This is left over from when _checkcopies was factored out from mergecopies.
The 2nd break has "of = None" before it, so it's a functionally equivalent
change. The 1st one, however, causes a divergence to be recorded when
a file has been renamed, but there is nothing to be merged to it.
This is currently harmless, since the extra divergence is simply ignored
later. However, the new _checkcopies introduced in the rest of this series
does more than just record a divergence after completing the main loop,
and it's important that the "post-processing" stage is really skipped
for no-merge-needed renames.
Forward copy detection (i.e. detecting what files have been moved/copied in
commit X since ancestor Y) previously required diff'ing the manifests of both X
and Y. This was expensive since it required reading both entire manifests and
doing a set difference (they weren't already in a set because of the
lazymanifest work). This cost almost 1 second on very large repositories, and
happens N times for a rebase of N commits.
This patch optimizes it for the case of rebase. In a rebase, we are comparing a
commit against it's immediate parent, and therefore we can know what files
changed by looking at ctx.files(). This lets us drastically decrease the size
of the set comparison, and makes it O(# of changes) instead of O(size of
manifest). This makes it take 1ms instead of 1000ms.
If we move all the files out of one directory, but into two different
directories, we should not consider it a directory rename. The
detection of this case was broken.