The recently introduced message was:
no unresolved files; you may continue your unfinished operation
This had three problems:
- looks a bit like an error message because it's not saying "we've
just resolved the last file"
- refers to "unfinished operation", which won't be the case with
"update" or "merge"
- introduces semicolons to error messages, which is stylistically
questionable
I've simplified this to:
no more unresolved files
In the future, if we want to prompt someone to continue a particular operation, we should use
a hint style:
no more unresolved files
(use 'hg graft --continue' to finish grafting)
When using resolve, users often have to consult with the output of |hg
resolve -l| to see if any unresolved files remain. This step is tedious
and adds overhead to resolving.
This patch will notify a user if there are no unresolved files remaining
after executing |hg resolve|::
no unresolved files; you may continue your unfinished operation
The patch stops short of telling the user exactly what command should be
executed to continue the unfinished operation. That is because this
information is not currently captured anywhere. This would make a
compelling follow-up feature.
Many tests didn't change back from subdirectories at the end of the tests ...
and they don't have to. The missing 'cd ..' could always be added when another
test case is added to the test file.
This change do that tests (99.5%) consistently end up in $TESTDIR where they
started, thus making it simpler to extend them or move them around.
When rebasing, if a conflict occurs and is resolved in a way the rebased
revision becomes empty, it is not skipped, unlike revisions being emptied
without conflicts.
The reason is:
- File 'x' is merged and resolved, merge.update() marks it as 'm' in the
dirstate.
- rebase.concludenode() calls localrepo.commit(), which calls
localrepo.status() which calls dirstate.status(). 'x' shows up as 'm' and is
unconditionnally added to the modified files list, instead of being checked
again.
- localrepo.commit() detects 'x' as changed an create a new revision where only
the manifest parents and linkrev differ.
Marking 'x' as modified without checking it makes sense for regular merges. But
in rebase case, the merge looks normal but the second parent is usually
discarded. When this happens, 'm' files in dirstate are a bit irrelevant and
should be considered 'n' possibly dirty instead. That is what the current patch
does.
Another approach, maybe more efficient, would be to pass another flag to
merge.update() saying the 'branchmerge' is a bit of a lie and recordupdate()
should call dirstate.normallookup() instead of merge().
It is also tempting to add this logic to dirstate.setparents(), moving from two
to one parent is what invalidates the 'm' markers. But this is a far bigger
change to make.
v2: succumb to the temptation and move the logic in dirstate.setparents(). mpm
suggested trying _filecommit() first but it is called by commitctx() which
knows nothing about the dirstate and comes too late into the game. A second
approach was to rewrite the 'm' state into 'n' on the fly in dirstate.status()
which failed for graft in the following case:
$ hg init repo
$ cd repo
$ echo a > a
$ hg ci -qAm0
$ echo a >> a
$ hg ci -m1
$ hg up 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg mv a b
$ echo c > b
$ hg ci -m2
created new head
$ hg graft 1 --tool internal:local
grafting revision 1
$ hg --config extensions.graphlog= glog --template '{rev} {desc|firstline}\n'
@ 3 1
|
o 2 2
|
| o 1 1
|/
o 0 0
$ hg log -r 3 --debug --patch --git --copies
changeset: 3:19cd7d1417952af13161b94c32e901769104560c
tag: tip
phase: draft
parent: 2:b5c505595c9e9a12d5dd457919c143e05fc16fb8
parent: -1:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
manifest: 3:3d27ce8d02241aa59b60804805edf103c5c0cda4
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
extra: branch=default
extra: source=a03df74c41413a75c0a42997fc36c2de97b26658
description:
1
Here, revision 3 is created because there is a copy record for 'b' in the
dirstate and thus 'b' is considered modified. But this information is discarded
at commit time since 'b' content is unchanged. I do not know if discarding this
information is correct or not, but at this time we cannot represent it anyway.
This patch therefore implements the last solution of moving the logic into
dirstate.setparents(). It does not sound crazy as 'm' files makes no sense with
only one parent. It also makes dirstate.merge() calls .lookupnormal() if there
is one parent, to preserve the invariant.
I am a bit concerned about introducing this kind of stateful behaviour to
existing code which historically treated setparents() as a basic setter without
side-effects. And doing that during the code freeze.
