Upon pull or unbundle, we display a message with the range of new revisions
fetched. This revision range could readily be used after a pull to look out
what's new with 'hg log'. The algorithm takes care of filtering "obsolete"
revisions that might be present in transaction's "changes" but should not be
displayed to the end user.
These are some simple cases. More to come in a future change.
Reviewers: krbullock
Reviewed By: krbullock
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4
Previously, two changes that were nearly, but not quite, identical would result
in large merge conflict regions that looked very similar, and were thus very
confusing to users, and lead people used to other source control systems to
claim that "mercurial's merge algorithms suck". In the relatively common case
of a new file being introduced in two branches with very slight modifications,
the old behavior would show the entire file as a conflict, and it would be very
difficult for a user to determine what was going on.
In the past, mercurial attempted to solve this with a "very smart" algorithm
that would find all common lines, but this has significant problems as
described in 3d22d20aa950.
Instead, we use a "very dumb" algorithm introduced in the previous patch that
simply matches lines at the periphery of conflict regions. This minimizes most
conflict regions well, though there may still be some degenerate edge cases,
like small modification to the beginning and end of a large file.
The current output for a failed merge with conflict markers looks something like:
merging foo
warning: conflicts during merge.
merging foo incomplete! (edit conflicts, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
merging bar
warning: conflicts during merge.
merging bar incomplete! (edit conflicts, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
We're going to change the way merges are done to perform all premerges before
all merges, so that the output above would look like:
merging foo
merging bar
warning: conflicts during merge.
merging foo incomplete! (edit conflicts, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
warning: conflicts during merge.
merging bar incomplete! (edit conflicts, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
The 'warning: conflicts during merge' line has no context, so is pretty
confusing.
This patch will change the future output to:
merging foo
merging bar
warning: conflicts while merging foo! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
warning: conflicts while merging bar! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
The hint on how to resolve the conflicts makes this a bit unwieldy, but solving
that is tricky because we already hint that people run 'hg resolve' to retry
unresolved merges. The 'hg resolve --mark' mostly applies to conflict marker
based resolution.
If a third label is provided it will be used for the "base" content:
<<<<<<< local
content
from
local
||||||| base
former
common
=======
other
conflicting
>>>>>>> other
Matt Mackall said:
The goal of simplemerge should have always been to be a drop-in
replacement for RCS merge. Please nuke this minimization thing entirely.
This whole things is now dead.
Globbing is usually used for filenames, so on windows it is reasonable and very
convenient that glob patterns accepts '\' or '/' when the pattern specifies
'/'.
We only verify the extension runs and that verify passes at the end as
constructing a test repository that would result in a shrink would be
nontrivial.
