Unlike untracked, the file is also missing from the working directory.
This test highlights a small misbehavior in output when reverting to another
revision.
This behavior didn't make much sense and interacts badly with things
that use unbundle internally like shelve. Presumably, the original
rationale was that since bundles didn't contain bookmarks, this gave a
sense of keeping bookmarks up-to-date like would happen with a
corresponding pull. However, since it only updated the current active
bookmark, and bare update already did that anyway, this is pretty
slim.
Notably, the corresponding test actually works better without this
feature.
By the magic of code movement, we ended up dropping unknown and ignored
information when comparing the working directory with a non-parent revision.
Let's stop doing it and add a test.
Old behavior:
hg help x hg x -h hg help -e x hg help -c x
config topic topic (!) - cmd
showconfig cmd topic (!) - cmd
rebase cmd cmd ext cmd
New behavior:
hg help x hg x -h hg help -e x hg help -c x
config topic cmd - cmd
showconfig cmd cmd - cmd
rebase cmd cmd ext cmd
This patch changes help text for "--edit" option of commands below:
- fetch
- qnew
- qrefresh
- qfold
- commit
- tag
This unification reduces translation cost, too.
This patch chooses not "further edit commit message already specified"
(of "hg commit") but "invoke editor on commit messages" as unified
help text for "--edit" option, because the latter is much older than
the former.
We used to have --style nosuch to list templates, but --style is now
merged with --template/-T where random strings are acceptable
templates. So we reserve 'list' to allow listing templates.
In Mercurial 3.0, "hg status" can list the same file twice if it was removed
but still exists in working directory, i.e. removed by "hg forget":
$ hg status --rev 0 removed
R removed
? removed
But since 64d05ea3a10f, untracked state, "?", is no longer displayed in this
example.
I think the new behavior is correct since a file should have single state, but
if it is a bug, this patch should be dropped.
When a bundle2 parts generator returns a non callable value, it should not be
used as a reply handler. The changegroup part generator is already having this
case of behavior when there is no changegroup to push. This changeset prevent a
crash for user of the experimentable bundle2 feature.
With this change resolve and revert produce consistent output when run with no
arguments:
$ hg resolve
abort: no files or directories specified
(use --all to remerge all files)
$ hg revert
abort: no files or directories specified
(use --all to revert all files)
Before this patch, largefiles gotten from revisions other than the
parent of the working directory at "hg revert" become "clean"
unexpectedly in steps below:
1. "repo.status()" is invoked (for status check before reverting)
1-1 "dirstate" entry for standinfile SF is "normal"-ed
(1-2 "lfdirstate" entry of largefile LF (for SF) is "normal"-ed)
2. "cmdutil.revert()" is invoked
2-1 standinfile SF is updated in the working directory
2-2 "dirstate" entry for SF is NOT updated
3. "lfcommands.updatelfiles()" is invoked (by "overrides.overriderevert()")
3-1 largefile LF (for SF) is updated in the working directory
3-2 "dirstate" returns "n" and valid timestamp for SF (by 1-1 and 2-2)
3-3 "lfdirstate" entry for LF is "normal"-ed
3-4 "lfdirstate" is written into ".hg/largefiles/dirstate", and
timestamp of LF is stored into "lfdirstate" file (by 3-3)
(ASSUMPTION: timestamp of LF differs from one of "lfdirstate" file)
Then, "hs status" treats LF as "clean", even though LF is updated by
"other" revision (by 3-1), because "lfilesrepo.status()" always treats
"normal"-ed files (by 3-3 and 3-4) as "clean".
When largefiles are reverted, they should be "normallookup"-ed
forcibly.
This patch uses "normallookup" on "lfdirstate" while reverting, by
passing "True" to newly added argument "normallookup".
Forcible "normallookup"-ing is not so expensive, because list of
target largefiles is explicitly specified in this case.
This patch uses "[debug] dirstate.delaywrite" feature in the test, to
ensure that timestamp of the largefile gotten from "other" revision is
stored into ".hg/largefiles/dirstate" (for ASSUMPTION at 3-4)
Before this patch, largefiles gotten from "other" revision (with
conflict) at "hg merge" become "clean" unexpectedly in steps below:
1. "repo.status()" is invoked (for status check before merging)
1-1 "dirstate" entry for standinfile SF is "normal"-ed
1-2 "lfdirstate" entry of largefile LF (for SF) is "normal"-ed
2. "merge.update()" is invoked
2-1 SF is updated in the working directory
(ASSUMPTION: user choice "other" at conflict)
2-2 "dirstate" entry for SF is "merge"-ed
3. "lfcommands.updatelfiles()" is invoked (by "overrides.hgmerge()")
3-1 largefile LF (for SF) is updated in the working directory
3-2 "dirstate" returns "m" for SF (by 2-2)
3-3 "lfdirstate" entry for LF is left as it is
3-4 "lfdirstate" is written into ".hg/largefiles/dirstate", and
timestamp of LF is stored into "lfdirstate" file (by 1-2)
(ASSUMPTION: timestamp of LF differs from one of "lfdirstate" file)
Then, "hs status" treats LF as "clean", even though LF is updated by
"other" revision (by 3-1), because "lfilesrepo.status()" always treats
"normal"-ed files (by 1-2 and 3-4) as "clean".
When state of standinfile in "dirstate" is "m", largefile should be
"normallookup"-ed.
This patch invokes "normallookup" on "lfdirstate" for merged files.
This patch uses "[debug] dirstate.delaywrite" feature in the test, to
ensure that timestamp of the largefile gotten from "other" revision is
stored into ".hg/largefiles/dirstate". (for ASSUMPTION at 3-4)
Before this patch, largefiles gotten from "other" revision (without
conflict) at "hg merge" become "clean" unexpectedly in steps below:
1. "merge.update()" is invoked
1-1 standinfile SF is updated in the working directory
1-2 "dirstate" entry for SF is "normallookup"-ed
2. "lfcommands.updatelfiles()" is invoked (by "overrides.hgmerge()")
2-1 largefile LF (for SF) is updated in the working directory
2-2 "dirstate" returns "n" for SF (by 1-2)
2-3 "lfdirstate" entry for LF is "normal"-ed
2-4 "lfdirstate" is written into ".hg/largefiles/dirstate", and
timestamp of LF is stored into "lfdirstate" file
(ASSUMPTION: timestamp of LF differs from one of "lfdirstate" file)
Then, "hs status" treats LF as "clean", even though LF is updated by
"other" revision (by 2-1), because "lfilesrepo.status()" always treats
"normal"-ed files (by 2-3 and 2-4) as "clean".
When timestamp is not set (= negative value) for standinfile in
"dirstate", largefile should be "normallookup"-ed regardless of
rebasing or not, because "n" state in "dirstate" doesn't ensure
"clean"-ness of a standinfile at that time.
This patch uses "normallookup" instead of "normal", if "mtime" of
standin is unset
This is a temporary way to fix with less changes. For fundamental
resolution of this kind of problems in the future, "lfdirstate" should
be updated with "dirstate" simultaneously while "merge.update"
execution: maybe by hooking "recordupdates"
It is also why this patch (temporarily) uses internal field "_map" of
"dirstate" directly.
This patch uses "[debug] dirstate.delaywrite" feature in the test, to
ensure that timestamp of the largefile gotten from "other" revision is
stored into ".hg/largefiles/dirstate". (for ASSUMPTION at 2-4)
This patch newly adds "test-largefiles-update.t", to avoid increasing
cost to run other tests for largefiles by subsequent patches
(especially, "[debug] dirstate.delaywrite" causes so).
This previously died in _revdescendants() taking the min() of the first set to
only(), when it was empty. An empty second set already worked. Likewise,
descendants() already handled an empty set.
This patch makes commit message shown in text editor customizable by
template. For example, this can advertise:
- sample commit messages for routine works,
- points to call attention before commit,
- message of the day, and so on
To show commit message correctly even in problematic encoding, this
patch chooses the latter below:
- replace "buildcommittext" with "buildcommittemplate" completely
- invoke "buildcommittemplate" only if '[committemplate] changeset'
is configured explicitly
For example, if multibyte character ending with backslash (0x5c) is
followed by ASCII character 'n' in the customized template, sequence
of backslash and 'n' is treated as line-feed unexpectedly (and
multibyte character is broken, too).
This corruption occurs in 'decode("string-escape")' while parsing
template string.
Add a new internal:tagmerge merge tool which implements an automatic merge
algorithm for mercurial's tag files
The tagmerge algorithm is able to resolve most merge conflicts that
currently would trigger a .hgtags merge conflict. The only case that
it does not (and cannot) handle is that in which two tags point to
different revisions on each merge parent _and_ their corresponding tag
histories have the same rank (i.e. the same length). In all other
cases the merge algorithm will choose the revision belonging to the
parent with the highest ranked tag history. The merged tag history is
the combination of both tag histories (special care is taken to try to
combine common tag histories where possible).
The algorithm also handles cases in which tags have been manually
removed from the .hgtags file and other similar corner cases.
In addition to actually merging the tags from two parents, taking into
account the base, the algorithm also tries to minimize the difference
between the merged tag file and the first parent's tag file (i.e. it
tries to make the merged tag order as as similar as possible to the
first parent's tag file order).
The algorithm works as follows:
1. read the tags from p1, p2 and the base
- when reading the p1 tags, also get the line numbers associated to each
tag node (these will be used to sort the merged tags in a way that
minimizes the diff to p1). Ignore the file numbers when reading p2 and
the base
2. recover the "lost tags" (i.e. those that are found in the base but not on p1
or p2) and add them back to p1 and/or p2
- at this point the only tags that are on p1 but not on p2 are those new
tags that were introduced in p1. Same thing for the tags that are on p2
but not on p2
3. take all tags that are only on p1 or only on p2 (but not on the base)
- Note that these are the tags that were introduced between base and p1 and
between base and p2, possibly on separate clones
4. for each tag found both on p1 and p2 perform the following merge algorithm:
- the tags conflict if their tag "histories" have the same "rank" (i.e.
length) _AND_ the last (current) tag is _NOT_ the same
- for non conflicting tags:
- choose which are the high and the low ranking nodes
- the high ranking list of nodes is the one that is longer.
In case of draw favor p1
- the merged node list is made of 3 parts:
- first the nodes that are common to the beginning of both the
low and the high ranking nodes
- second the non common low ranking nodes
- finally the non common high ranking nodes (with the last one
being the merged tag node)
- note that this is equivalent to putting the whole low ranking node
list first, followed by the non common high ranking nodes
- note that during the merge we keep the "node line numbers", which will
be used when writing the merged tags to the tag file
5. write the merged tags taking into account to their positions in the first
parent (i.e. try to keep the relative ordering of the nodes that come
from p1). This minimizes the diff between the merged and the p1 tag files
This is done by using the following algorithm
- group the nodes for a given tag that must be written next to each other
- A: nodes that come from consecutive lines on p1
- B: nodes that come from p2 (i.e. whose associated line number is None)
and are next to one of the a nodes in A
- each group is associated with a line number coming from p1
- generate a "tag block" for each of the groups
- a tag block is a set of consecutive "node tag" lines belonging to the
same tag and which will be written next to each other on the merged
tags file
- sort the "tag blocks" according to their associated number line
- put blocks whose nodes come all from p2 first
- write the tag blocks in the sorted order
Notes:
- A few tests have been added to test-tag.t. These tests are very specific to
the new internal:tagmerge tool, so perhaps they should be moved to their own
test file.
- The merge algorithm was discussed in a thread on the mercurial mailing list.
In http://markmail.org/message/anqaxldup4tmgyrx a slightly different algorithm
was suggested. In it the p1 and p2 tags would have been interleaved instead of
put one before the other. It would be possible to implement that but my tests
suggest that the merge result would be more confusing and harder to understand.
As extensively detailed by Pierre-Yves[1], simplemerge's minimal
markers can result in hopeless confusion for many common merges. As it
happens, we accidentally inherited this behavior when we borrowed
simplemerge from bzr; it is not the behavior used by RCS's merge(1),
Since merge(1) (and not bzr) is what we aim to emulate when emulating
RCS's merge markers, we simply turn this feature off. This brings us
in line with the behavior of CVS, SVN, and Git as a bonus.
(NB: using conflict markers with Mercurial is discouraged.)
[1] http://markmail.org/message/wj5mh3lc46czlvld
convert glob tessa
We now also test reverting file to another revision's content. However
this differs from previously introduced test by using the explicit path
of each "case file" when calling revert. This should result in the
same result regarding file content and backup creation, but the output
of the `hg revert` call should differ.
We now also test reverting file to the working directory parent
content. However this differs from the previously introduced test by using
the explicit path of each "case file" when calling revert. This should
result in the same result regarding file content and backup creation,
but the output of the `hg revert` call should differ.
Now that we can automatically generate states, we need to actually run
revert on them and check the result. While running such tests we are
checking multiple elements. The output of the `hg revert` command, the
resulting content of file, and the creation of backup file.
The first practical test is using the simple case `hg revert --all`, reverting
all files to working directory parent content.
The text version is just a list of existing files with their content. We use a
small custom script for that.
This is going to be very useful for comparing revert results with
revert target content.
There are multiple comments explaining the expected output of commands. This is
an old relic of the pre-unified test era. We remove them for uselessness.
