This backs out
changeset: 13158:17d1b96c0f12
user: Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com>
date: Tue Dec 07 03:29:21 2010 +0100
summary: merge: fast-forward merge with descendant
Before named branches, the invariants were:
a) "merges" always have two parents
b) p1 is not linearly related to p2
Adding named branches made (b) problematic, so the above patch was
introduced, which fixed (b) but broke (a).
After discussion, we decided that the invariants should be:
a) "merges" always have two parents
b) p1 is not linearly related to p2 OR p1 and p2 are on different branches
issue2538 gives a case where a changeset is merged with its child (which is on
another branch), and to my surprise the result is a real merge with two
parents, not just a "fast forward" "merge" with only the child as parent.
That is essentially the same as issue619.
Is the existing behaviour as intended and correct?
Or is the following fix correct?
Some extra "created new head" pops up with this fix, but it seems to me like
they could be considered correct. The old branch head has been superseeded by
changes on the other branch, and when the changes on the other branch is merged
back to the branch it will introduce a new head not directly related to the
previous branch head.
(I guess the intention with existing behaviour could be to ensure that the
changesets on the branch are directly connected and that no new heads pops up
on merges.)
