We parse "descend" symbol as a Boolean using getboolean (prior extraction by
getargsdict already checked that it is a symbol).
In tests, check for error cases and vary Boolean values here and there.
The tag changes information we compute is now written to disk. This gives
hooks full access to that data.
The format picked for that file uses a 2 characters prefix for the action:
-R: tag removed
+A: tag added
-M: tag moved (old value)
+M: tag moved (new value)
This format allows hooks to easily select the line that matters to them without
having to post process the file too much. Here is a couple of examples:
* to select all newly tagged changeset, match "^+",
* to detect tag move, match "^.M",
* to detect tag deletion, match "-R".
Once again we rely on the fact the tag tests run through all possible
situations to test this change.
We now compute the proper actuall differences between tags before and after the
transaction. This catch a couple of false positives in the tests.
The compute the full difference since we are about to make this data available
to hooks in the next changeset.
This changeset introduces detection of tags changes during transaction. When
this happens a 'tag_moved=1' argument is set for hooks, similar to what we do
for bookmarks and phases.
This code is disabled by default as there are still various performance
concerns. Some require a smarter use of our existing tag caches and some other
require rework around the transaction logic to skip execution when unneeded.
These performance improvements have been delayed, I would like to be able to
experiment and stabilize the feature behavior first.
Later changesets will push the concept further and provide a way for hooks to
know what are the actual changes introduced by the transaction. Similar work
is needed for the other families of changes (bookmark, phase, obsolescence,
etc). Upgrade of the transaction logic will likely be performed at the same
time.
The current code can report some false positive when .hgtags file changes but
resulting tags are unchanged. This will be fixed in the next changeset.
For testing, we simply globally enable a hook in the tag test as all the
possible tag update cases should exist there. A couple of them show the false
positive mentioned above.
See in code documentation for more details.
If initial 'fctx' has changes in line range with respect to its parents, we
yield it first. This makes 'followlines(..., descend=True)' consistent with
'descendants()' revset which yields the starting revision.
We reuse one iteration of blockancestors() which does exactly what we want.
In test-annotate.t, adjust 'startrev' in one case to cover the situation where
the starting revision does not touch specified line range.
If this assertion fails, this indicates a flaw in the algorithm. So fail fast
instead of possibly producing wrong results.
Also extend the target line range in test to catch a merge changeset with all
its parents.
Module 'appdirs' tries to import win32com.shell (and catch ImportError as an
indication of failure) to check whether some further functionality should
be implemented one or another way [1]. Of course, demandimport lets it down, so
if we want appdirs to work we have to add it to demandimport's ignore list.
The reason we want appdirs to work is becuase it is used by setuptools [2] to
determine egg cache location. Only fairly recent versions of setuptools depend
on this so people don't see this often.
[1] https://github.com/ActiveState/appdirs/blob/master/appdirs.py#L560
[2] aae0a92811/pkg_resources/__init__.py (L1369)
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
This changeset introduce the common setup script used by these tests.
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case D-4: unknown changeset in between known on
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case D3: missing prune target (prune not in "pushed set")
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce D-2: missing prune target (prune in "pushed set")
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case D-1:
Pruned changeset based on missing precursor of something not present
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce C.4: multiple successors, one is pruned
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case C-3:
Pruned changeset on precursors of another pruned one
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce C-2: Pruned changeset on precursors
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce C-1: Multiple pruned changeset atop each other
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
In the initial implementation of blockdescendants (and thus followlines(...,
descend=True) revset), only the first branch encountered in descending
direction was followed.
Update the algorithm so that all children of a revision ('x' in code) are
considered. Accordingly, we need to prevent a child revision to be yielded
multiple times when it gets visited through different path, so we skip 'i'
when this occurs. Finally, since we now consider all parents of a possible
child touching a given line range, we take care of yielding the child if it
has a diff in specified line range with at least one of its parent (same logic
as blockancestors()).
Our current deprecation warning mechanism relies on ui object. They are case
where we cannot have access to the UI object. On a general basis we avoid using
the python mechanism for deprecation warning because up to Python 2.6 it is
exposing warning to unsuspecting user who cannot do anything to deal with them.
So we build a "safe" strategy to hide this warnings behind a flag in an
environment variable. The test runner set this flag so that tests show these
warning. This will help us marker API as deprecated for extensions to update
their code.
Mostly copy CSS rules from style-paper.css into style-gitweb.css. The only
modification is addition of !important on "background-color" rule for
"pre.sourcelines > span.followlines-selected" selector as the background color
is otherwise overriden by "pre.sourcelines.stripes > :nth-child(4n+4)" rule.
Previously, the --template/-T option didn't show up in help because it's marked
as experimental. It's not really experimental for show, and its quite important
for show's funcationality, so let's make sure it always shows up.
This is the beginning of a wip/smartlog view. It is basically a manually
constructed (read: fast) revset function to collect "relevant"
changesets combined with a custom template and a graph displayer.
It obviously needs a lot of work.
I'd like to get *something* usable in 4.2 so `hg show` has some value
to end-users.
Let the bikeshedding begin.
Because we're formatting to RST, short lines wrap and there
needs to be an extra line break between paragraphs to prevent
that.
In addition, the indentation in the old code was a bit off.
Refactor the code to a function (so we don't leak variables outside
the module) and modify it so it renders more correctly.
When this "descend" query parameter is present along with "linerange"
parameter, we get revisions following line range in descending order. The
parameter has no effect without "linerange".
This is useful to follow changes in a block of lines forward in the history
(for instance, when one wants to find out how a function evolved from a point
in history).
We added a 'descend' parameter to followlines(), which defaults to False. If
True, followlines() returns descendants of startrev.
Because context.blockdescendants() does not follow renames, these are not
followed by the revset either, so history will end when a rename occurs (as
can be seen in tests).
Mercurial can't currently send cookies as part of HTTP requests.
Some authentication systems use cookies. So, it seems like adding
support for sending cookies seems like a useful feature.
This patch implements support for reading cookies from a file
and automatically sending them as part of the request. We rely
on the "cookiejar" Python module to do the heavy lifting of
parsing cookies files. We currently only support the Mozilla
(really Netscape-era) cookie format. There is another format
supported by cookielib and we may want to consider using that,
especially since the Netscape cookie parser can't parse ports.
It wasn't immediately obvious to me what the format of the other
parser is, so I didn't know how to test it. I /think/ it might
be literal "Cookie" header values, but I'm not sure. If it is
more robust than the Netscape format, we may want to just
support it.
Like field init shorthand of Rust. This is convenient for building a JSON
object from selected keywords.
This means dict() won't support Python-like dict(iterable) syntax because
it's ambiguous. Perhaps it could be implemented as 'mapdict(xs % (k, v))'.
Before, it could spill an internal representation of compiled template such
as [(<function runsymbol at 0x....>, 'extras'), ...]. Show less cryptic
message if no symbol found.
New findsymbolicname() function will be also used by dict() constructor.
This makes the next patch slightly simpler. We don't need to check the
excessive number of keyword arguments since unknown and duplicated kwargs
are rejected.
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B-7: Prune above non-targeted common changeset
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B6: Pruned changeset with precursors not in pushed set
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
