Unknown requirements will now be reported as:
abort: repository requires features unknown to this Mercurial: largefiles!
(see http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MissingRequirement for more information)
Some features of this phrasing:
* avoid double ':' in abort message
* make it more clear who requires and knows what
* don't quote the requirement names - it is not something the user entered or
need the exact spelling of ... and it is "identifiers" that are unambiguous
anyway
* remove double hint by removing "(upgrade Mercurial)" comment
* don't mention upgrading Mercurial without mentioning enabling the feature -
instead, just refer to wiki page for both
* don't just talk about "details", talk about "more information"
The wiki page is intended to describe several solution to the requirement issue.
Some of those solutions does not involve upgrading mercurial. That is very
useful for people that can't easily upgrade they Mercurial in some place.
Since bookmarks are no longer merged with repo.tags() as of
8e2d23f4bd25, they don't show up in `hg id` as they used to. This adds
them back into the summary that `hg id` prints, and adds a
-B/--bookmarks flag alongside the -t/--tags and -b/--branch options.
Note this introduces a slight backwards-incompatibility: the summary
printed by `hg id` now separates bookmarks from tags with a space, as
seen below, instead of running it into the tags list.
Default summary output:
$ hg id
db815d6d32e6 tip/tag1 bm1/bm2
Output with --bookmarks:
$ hg id --bookmarks
bm1 bm2
See also 5672c9e8202d which adds bookmarks back into `hg summary`.
This improves the misleading error message
$ hg identify
abort: there is no Mercurial repository here (.hg not found)!
to the more explicit
$ hg identify
abort: requirement 'fake' not supported!
for all commands in commands.optionalrepo, which includes the identify
and serve commands in particular.
This is for the case when a new entry in .hg/requires will be defined
in a future Mercurial release.
