Summary:
Turned on the auto formatter. Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --take BLACK **/*.py`.
Then run `arc lint` again so some other autofixers like spellchecker etc. looked
at the code base. Manually accept the changes whenever they make sense, or use
a workaround (ex. changing "dict()" to "dict constructor") where autofix is false
positive. Disabled linters on files that are hard (i18n/polib.py) to fix, or less
interesting to fix (hgsubversion tests), or cannot be fixed without breaking
OSS build (FBPYTHON4).
Conflicted linters (test-check-module-imports.t, part of test-check-code.t,
test-check-pyflakes.t) are removed or disabled.
Duplicated linters (test-check-pyflakes.t, test-check-pylint.t) are removed.
An issue of the auto-formatter is lines are no longer guarnateed to be <= 80
chars. But that seems less important comparing with the benefit auto-formatter
provides.
As we're here, also remove test-check-py3-compat.t, as it is currently broken
if `PYTHON3=/bin/python3` is set.
Reviewed By: wez, phillco, simpkins, pkaush, singhsrb
Differential Revision: D8173629
fbshipit-source-id: 90e248ae0c5e6eaadbe25520a6ee42d32005621b
Before this patch, every Python process during a code coverage run was
writing coverage data to the same file. I'm not sure if the coverage
package even tries to obtain a lock on the file. But what I do know is
there was some last write wins leading to loss of code coverage data, at
least with -j > 1.
This patch changes the code coverage mechanism to be multiple process
safe. The mechanism for initializing code coverage via sitecustomize.py
has been tweaked so each Python process will produce a separate coverage
data file on disk. Unless two processes generate the same random value,
there are no race conditions writing to the same file. At the end of the
test run, we combine all written files into an aggregate report.
On my machine, running the full test suite produces a little over
20,000 coverage files consuming ~350 MB. As you can imagine, it takes
several seconds to load and merge these coverage files. But when it is
done, you have an accurate picture of the aggregate code coverage for the
entire test suite, which is ~60% line coverage.
