Add an option that only ignores whitespaces at EOL. The name of the option is
the same as Git.
.. feature::
Added `--ignore-space-at-eol` diff option to ignore whitespace differences
at line endings.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D422
The ability to negate any boolean flags itself is great, but I think we are not
ready to expose the help side of it yet.
First, while there exist a handful of such flags whose default value can be
changed (eg: git diff, patchwork confirmation), there is only a few of them. The
users who benefit the most from this change are alias users and large
installation that can deploy extension to change behavior (eg: facebook
tweakdefault). So the majority of user who will be affected by a large change
to command help that is not yet relevant to them. (I expect this to become
relevant when ui.progressive start to exists).
Below is an example of the impact of the new help on 'hg help diff':
-r --rev REV [+] revision
-c --change REV change made by revision
-a --[no-]text treat all files as text
-g --[no-]git use git extended diff format
--[no-]nodates omit dates from diff headers
--[no-]noprefix omit a/ and b/ prefixes from filenames
-p --[no-]show-function show which function each change is in
--[no-]reverse produce a diff that undoes the changes
-w --[no-]ignore-all-space ignore white space when comparing lines
-b --[no-]ignore-space-change ignore changes in the amount of white space
-B --[no-]ignore-blank-lines ignore changes whose lines are all blank
-U --unified NUM number of lines of context to show
--[no-]stat output diffstat-style summary of changes
--root DIR produce diffs relative to subdirectory
-I --include PATTERN [+] include names matching the given patterns
-X --exclude PATTERN [+] exclude names matching the given patterns
-S --[no-]subrepos recurse into subrepositories
Another issue with the current state of help, the default value for the
flag is not conveyed to the user. For example in the 'backout' help, there is
no real distinction between "--[no-]backup" (default to True) and "--[no-]keep"
(default) to False:
--[no-]backup no backups
--[no-]keep do not modify working directory during strip
In addition, I've discussed with Augie Fackler and the last batch of the work on
this have burned him out quite some. Therefore he is not intending to perform
any more work on this topic. Quoting him, he would rather see the help part
backed out than spending more time on it.
I do not think we are ready to expose this to users in 4.0 (freeze in a week),
especially because we cannot expect quick improvement on these aspect as this
topic no longer have an owner. We should be able to reintroduce that change in
the future when someone get back on it and the main issues are solves:
* Introduction of ui.progressive makes it relevant for a majority of user,
* Current default value are efficiently conveyed to the user.
(In addition, the excerpt from diff help show that we still have some issue with
some negative option like '--nodates' so further improvement are probably
welcome there.)
That is, help gets tweaked thus:
global options ([+] can be repeated):
-v --[no-]verbose enable additional output
Other proposals have included:
global options ([+] can be repeated, options marked [?] are boolean flags):
-v --verbose[?] enable additional output
and
global options ([+] can be repeated, options marked [^] are boolean flags):
-v --verbose[^] enable additional output
which avoid the unfortunate visual noise in this patch. In this
version's favor, it's consistent with what I'm used to seeing in man
pages and similar documentation venues.
While using the record extension to select changes, the user couldn't see the
content of newly added files and had to select/reject them based on filename.
The test is changed accordingly in two places.
Changeset d735f8a82023 introduced "showing prompt choice if input is
not a tty but is forced to be interactive" and adjusted expected
output in test-record.t.
But some tests for no-execbit platform (= Windows) were not adjusted
by d735f8a82023.
This causes unexpected failure of test-record on Windows environment.
This patch adds below to prompt lines for such tests:
- prompt choice at the end of prompt line, and
- empty line after prompt line
The tests often set ui.interactive to control normally interactive prompts from
stdin. That gave an output where it was non-obvious what prompts got which
which response, and the output lacked the newline users would see after input.
Instead, if the input not is a tty, write the selection and a newline.
Before this patch, record extension gets the list of available
responses from online help document of "hg record" in the tricky way,
even though the value passed to "ui.promptchoice()" has enough (maybe
i18n-ed) information.
This patch uses "ui.extractchoices()" to get the list of available
responses.
The -u flag didn't work when ui.username was not set and resulted in an
abort message. This was fixed by checking for the 'user' key in the opts
dictionary. If the key is present, the step causing the exception is not
executed.
BSD sed requires the 'i' command to be followed with a backslash and a
newline, like so:
$ sed -e '/^@/i\
> other'
We've encountered this problem before, e.g. in test-mq.t (215a8789129e).
This change adds a check-code rule and fixes two instances of the
problem in test-record.t.
This makes record work more like import which ignores for instance mail footers
in a patch file.
This also makes it possible for TortoiseHg to preview unapplied patches
containing such footers.
Many tests didn't change back from subdirectories at the end of the tests ...
and they don't have to. The missing 'cd ..' could always be added when another
test case is added to the test file.
This change do that tests (99.5%) consistently end up in $TESTDIR where they
started, thus making it simpler to extend them or move them around.
It is possible that unrelated changes in a file are on sequential lines. The
current record extension does not allow these to be committed independently.
An example use case for this is in software development for deeply embedded
real-time systems. In these environments, it is not always possible to use a
debugger (due to time-constraints) and hence inline UART-based printing is
often used. When fixing a bug in a module, it is often convenient to add a
large number of 'printf's (linked to the UART via a custom fputc) to the module
in order to work out what is going wrong. printf is a very slow function (and
also variadic so somewhat frowned upon by the MISRA standard) and hence it is
highly undesirable to commit these lines to the repository. If only a partial
fix is implemented, however, it is desirable to commit the fix without deleting
all of the printf lines. This is also simplifies removal of the printf lines
as once the final fix is committed, 'hg revert' does the rest. It is likely
that the printf lines will be very near the actual fix, so being able to split
the hunk is very useful in this case.
There were two alternatives I considered for the user interface. One was to
manually edit the patch, the other to allow a hunk to be split into individual
lines for consideration. The latter option would require a significant
refactor of the record module and is less flexible. While the former is
potentially more complicated to use, this is a feature that is likely to only
be used in certain exceptional cases (such as the use case proposed above) and
hence I felt that the complexity would not be a considerable issue.
I've also written a follow-up patch that refactors the 'prompt' code to base
everything on the choices variable. This tidies up and clarifies the code a
bit (removes constructs like 'if ret == 7' and removes the 'e' option from the
file scope options as it's not relevant there. It's not really a necessity, so
I've excluded it from this submission for now, but I can send it separately if
there's a desire and it's on bitbucket (see below) in the meantime.
Possible future improvements include:
* Tidying up the 'prompt' code to base everything on the choices variable.
This would allow entries to be removed from the prompt as currently 'e' is
offered even for entire file patches, which is currently unsupported.
* Allowing the entire file (or even multi-file) patch to be edited manually:
this would require quite a large refactor without much benefit, so I decided
to exclude it from the initial submission.
* Allow the option to retry if a patch fails to apply (this is what Git does).
This would require quite a bit of refactoring given the current 'hg record'
implementation, so it's debatable whether it's worth it.
Output is similar to existing record user interface except that an additional
option ('e') exists to allow manual editing of the patch. This opens the
user's configured editor with the patch. A comment is added to the bottom of
the patch explaining what to do (based on Git's one).
A large proportion of the changeset is test-case changes to update the options
reported by record (Ynesfdaq? instead of Ynsfdaq?). Functional changes are in
record.py and there are some new test cases in test-record.t.
This turns the prompt sequence from something like:
$ examine changes to foo?
$ record change 1/4 to foo?
$ record change 2/4 to foo?
$ examine changes to bar?
$ record change 4/4 to bar?
into:
$ examine changes to foo?
$ record change 1/3 to foo?
$ record change 2/3 to foo?
$ examine change to bar?
$ record change 3/3 to bar?
