8a92e6790099 broke bookmarks getting copied during uncompressed clones. Since
most of the pull logic has been moved into exchange.py, lets just call
exchange.pull to fix up the repo with the latest bits after the streaming clone
has bootstrapped the repo. This keeps us from having to duplicate the bookmark
logic.
There is no reason for bookmarks to get a special treatment. As a first step we
move the code as is in the `exchange.pull` function. Integration with the rest
of the flow will come later.
Adding bookmarks to pull means that most clone paths are now pulling bookmarks
through pull. We ensure that bookmark-update messages are properly suppressed in
that case.
In test-pull-http.t the 'requesting all changes' message disappear because we
now get the authentication error on the `listkeys`command before such message
is printed.
Recomputing branch cache on clone may be expensive,
therefore if possible we fetch it along with the data.
- If the clone is performed by copying, we just copy branchcache file.
- If we localrepo.clone and streaming then we follow the procedure:
1. Fetch branchmap from the remote
2. Fetch the actual data.
3. Find the latest rev within branch heads (tip at the time of
branchmap fetch)
4. Update the cache for the revs in [remotetip+1, tip]
This way we ensure that the branchcache is correct even in case
of races with commits.
This means that we now discover both subset conditions (local<remote and
remote<local) in a single roundtrip without ever constructing an actual
sample (which takes a bit of client CPU).
Send the command arguments in the HTTP headers. The command is still part
of the URL. If the server does not have the 'httpheader' capability, the
client will send the command arguments in the URL as it did previously.
Web servers typically allow more data to be placed within the headers than
in the URL, so this approach will:
- Avoid HTTP errors due to using a URL that is too large.
- Allow Mercurial to implement a more efficient wire protocol.
An alternate approach is to send the arguments as part of the request body.
This approach has been rejected because it requires the use of POST
requests, so it would break any existing configuration that relies on the
request type for authentication or caching.
Extensibility:
- The header size is provided by the server, which makes it possible to
introduce an hgrc setting for it.
- The client ignores the capability value after the first comma, which
allows more information to be included in the future.
Immediately sends local's heads to the server to check whether the server knows them all.
If it does, we can call getbundle immediately.
Interesting test output changes are:
- added 1 changesets with 0 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
+ added 1 changesets with 0 changes to 0 files (+1 heads)
-> The new getbundle() actually fixes a bug vs. changegroupsubset() in that it no longer
returns unnecessary files when file revs are reused.
warning: repository is unrelated
+ requesting all changes
-> The new use of common instead of bases correctly indicates that an unrelated pull
gets all changes from the server.
We explicitly want to update bookmarks from a remote. This will avoid
duplicate calls to listkeys if we clone (which calls pull) and keep
bookmark related code together.
