D942 removed the experimental config 'histeditng'. This is a leftover
which should have been removed in that commit. Therefore, this commit completes
the cleanup.
Test Plan:
Ran all the tests.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1123
This config has been around for about 2 years now. So, it can be
assumed to be stable. Therefore, I am removing the config. This also makes the
test 'test-histedit-base.t' compatible with chg.
Test Plan:
- Ran the test 'test-histedit-base.t' with and without '--chg' option.
- Ran all the other tests without '--chg' option.
- Checked the output of 'hg help histedit'.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D942
Changes the API of `ui.edit()` to take an optional `action` argument,
which is used when constructing the suffix of the temp file.
Previously, it was possible to set the suffix by specifying a `suffix` to the
optional `extra` dict that was passed to `ui.edit()`, but the goal is to
drop support for `extra.suffix` and make `action` a required argument.
To this end, `ui.edit()` now yields a `develwarn()` if `action` is not set
or if `extra.suffix` is set.
I updated all calls to `ui.edit()` I could find in `hg-crew` to specify the
appropriate `action`. This means that when creating a commit, instead
of the path to the editor file being something like:
`/tmp/hg-editor-XXXXXX.txt`
it is now something like:
`/tmp/hg-editor-XXXXXX.commit.hg.txt`
Some editors (such as Atom) make it possible to statically define a [TextMate]
grammar for files with a particular suffix. For example, because Git reliably
uses `.git/COMMIT_EDITMSG` and `.git/MERGE_MSG` as the paths for commit-type
messages, it is trivial to define a grammar that is applied when files of
either name are opened in Atom:
https://github.com/atom/language-git/blob/v0.19.1/grammars/git%20commit%20message.cson#L4-L5
Because Hg historically used a generic `.txt` suffix, it was much harder to
disambiguate whether a file was an arbitrary text file as opposed to one
created for the specific purpose of authoring an Hg commit message.
This also makes it easier to add special support for `histedit`, as it has its own
suffix that is distinct from a commit:
`/tmp/hg-histedit-XXXXXX.histedit.hg.txt`
Test Plan:
Added an integration test: `test-editor-filename.t`.
Manually tested: ran `hg ci --amend` for this change and saw that it
used `/tmp/hg-editor-ZZjcz0.commit.hg.txt` as the path instead of
`/tmp/hg-editor-ZZjcz0.txt` as the path.
Verified `make tests` passes.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D464
If someone changes "pick" to "roll" or "fold" for the first
changeset in a histedit rule Mercurial could remove a wrong
changeset if the phase is non-public.
roll or fold for the first changeset should be invalid.
rebase will have similar logic, so let's extract it. Besides, it makes
the histedit code more readable.
We may want to parametrize acceptintervention() by the exception(s)
that should result in transaction close.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D66
The transaction is only used within a single function, so no need to
store it on the state object.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D64
Previously, histedit.cleanupnode pass root nodes one by one. Since
repair.strip takes multiple nodes and can handle them just fine, pass all
strip roots at once.
This is BC because the number of strip backup files may change from N to 1.
histedit treats topmost bookmark movement specially. The rest of the
bookmark movement could be handled by scmutil.cleanupnodes. So let's move
the special logic out to make the patch easier to review.
This is more consistent with other commands, like "commit -v" won't show
bookmark movement messages.
It will make migrating to scmutil.cleanupnodes easier.
This is one step towards removing a bunch of "if isinstance(gen,
unbundle20)" by treating bundle1 and bundle2 more similarly.
The name may sounds ironic for a method in the bundle2 module, but I
didn't think it was worth it yet to create a new 'bundle' module that
depends on the 'bundle2' module. Besides, we'll inline the method
again later.
cmdutil.command wasn't a member of the registrar framework only for a
historical reason. Let's make that happen. This patch keeps cmdutil.command
as an alias for extension compatibility.
By recording what operation created the obsmarker, we can show very intuitive
messages to the user in various UIs. For instance, log output could have
messages like "Amended as XXX" to show why a commit is old and has an 'x' on it.
@ ac28e3 durham
/ First commit
|
| o d4afe7 durham
| | Second commit
| |
| x 8e9a5d (Amended as ac28e3) durham
|/ First commit
|
Previously, we'd rely on the implicit check that `localrepo.commit` did.
The problem is that that check only happened when the working copy was
dirty. With a "clean" working copy but unresolved conflicts we'd get
into a broken state.
To fix that, do what rebase does and check for unresolved conflicts at
the start of histedit --continue.
Before 33e44341bb82, histedit (like rebase) was only creating markers on final
success from the old-rewritten node to the newly created nodes (as of before
33e44341bb82). In case of abort the aborted attempt were stripped to restore the
repository in its state prior to the attempt.
This use of strip was on purpose. Using markers in this case introduces various
issues. The main one is that keeping the partial result of histedit as obsolete
prevents us to recreates the same nodes in a second attempt. The same operation
will lead to an identical results, using an identical node that already exists
in the repository as obsolete.
To conclude, we cannot and should not switch to obsolescence markers creation on
histedit --abort and we backout 33e44341bb82. A test to catch this class of
issue will be introduced in the next changeset.
Move "cleanupnode" (unsafe strip) into "safecleanupnode" so it's impossible
to call the unsafe function directly.
This helps reduce future programming errors.
The new method will decide between:
- cleanupnode, which calls the unsafe repair.strip
- create obsmarkers
Ideally, nobody calls "cleanupnode" directly except for "safecleanupnode".
This adds an option (which defaults to False) to run entire histedits in a
single transaction. This results in 20-25% faster histedits in large repos where
transaction startup cost is expensive.
I didn't want to enable this by default because it has some unfortunate side
effects. For instance, if a pretxncommit hook throws midway through the
histedit, it will rollback the entire histedit and lose any progress the user
had made. Same if the user aborts editting a commit message. It's still worth
turning this on for large repos, but probably not for normal sized repos.
Long term, once we have inmemory merging, we could do the entire histedit in
memory, without a transaction, then we could selectively rollback just parts of
it in the event of an exception.
Tested it by running the tests with
`--extra-config-opt=histedit.singletransaction=True`. The only failure was
related to the hook rollback issue I mention above.
We only want to pop the action after the action is completed, since if the
action aborts part way through we want it to remain at the front of the list so
continue/abort will start with it.
Previously we relied on the fact that we only serialized the state file at the
beginning of the action, so the pop wasn't serialized until the next iteration
of the loop. In a future patch we will be adding a large transaction around this
area, which means if we pop the list early it might get serialized if the action
throws a user InterventionRequired error, at which point the action is not in
the list anymore. So let's only pop it once the action is really truly done.
This change adjusts and documents the new behaviour of 'roll'. It now fits nicely
with the behaviour of 'commit --amend' and the 'edit' action, by discarding the
date as well as the commit message of the second commit. Previously it used the
later date, like 'fold', but this often wasn't desirable, for example, in the
common use case of using 'roll' to add forgotten changes to a changeset
(because 'hg add' was previously forgotten or not all changes were identified
while using 'hg record').
This clarifies in the histedit documentation that the 'edit' action preserves
the date and that the 'fold' action uses the later date. The documentation was
previously silent on this issue which left users in doubt.