mirror of
https://github.com/facebook/sapling.git
synced 2024-10-07 07:17:55 +03:00
15da3ac7f2
When issuing `hg pull -r REV` in a repo with no common ancestor with the remote repo, the message 'requesting all changes' is printed, even though only the changese that are ancestors of REV are actually requested. This can be confusing for users (see http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2010-October/035508.html). This silences the message if (and only if) the '-r' option was passed.
145 lines
2.4 KiB
Perl
145 lines
2.4 KiB
Perl
this structure seems to tickle a bug in bundle's search for
|
|
changesets, so first we have to recreate it
|
|
|
|
o 8
|
|
|
|
|
| o 7
|
|
| |
|
|
| o 6
|
|
|/|
|
|
o | 5
|
|
| |
|
|
o | 4
|
|
| |
|
|
| o 3
|
|
| |
|
|
| o 2
|
|
|/
|
|
o 1
|
|
|
|
|
o 0
|
|
|
|
$ mkrev()
|
|
> {
|
|
> revno=$1
|
|
> echo "rev $revno"
|
|
> echo "rev $revno" > foo.txt
|
|
> hg -q ci -m"rev $revno"
|
|
> }
|
|
|
|
setup test repo1
|
|
|
|
$ hg init repo1
|
|
$ cd repo1
|
|
$ echo "rev 0" > foo.txt
|
|
$ hg ci -Am"rev 0"
|
|
adding foo.txt
|
|
$ mkrev 1
|
|
rev 1
|
|
|
|
first branch
|
|
|
|
$ mkrev 2
|
|
rev 2
|
|
$ mkrev 3
|
|
rev 3
|
|
|
|
back to rev 1 to create second branch
|
|
|
|
$ hg up -r1
|
|
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
$ mkrev 4
|
|
rev 4
|
|
$ mkrev 5
|
|
rev 5
|
|
|
|
merge first branch to second branch
|
|
|
|
$ hg up -C -r5
|
|
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
$ HGMERGE=internal:local hg merge
|
|
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
|
|
$ echo "merge rev 5, rev 3" > foo.txt
|
|
$ hg ci -m"merge first branch to second branch"
|
|
|
|
one more commit following the merge
|
|
|
|
$ mkrev 7
|
|
rev 7
|
|
|
|
back to "second branch" to make another head
|
|
|
|
$ hg up -r5
|
|
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
$ mkrev 8
|
|
rev 8
|
|
|
|
$ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
|
|
$ echo "graphlog=" >> $HGRCPATH
|
|
|
|
the story so far
|
|
|
|
$ hg glog --template "{rev}\n"
|
|
@ 8
|
|
|
|
|
| o 7
|
|
| |
|
|
| o 6
|
|
|/|
|
|
o | 5
|
|
| |
|
|
o | 4
|
|
| |
|
|
| o 3
|
|
| |
|
|
| o 2
|
|
|/
|
|
o 1
|
|
|
|
|
o 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
check that "hg outgoing" really does the right thing
|
|
|
|
sanity check of outgoing: expect revs 4 5 6 7 8
|
|
|
|
$ hg clone -r3 . ../repo2
|
|
adding changesets
|
|
adding manifests
|
|
adding file changes
|
|
added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files
|
|
updating to branch default
|
|
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
|
|
this should (and does) report 5 outgoing revisions: 4 5 6 7 8
|
|
|
|
$ hg outgoing --template "{rev}\n" ../repo2
|
|
comparing with ../repo2
|
|
searching for changes
|
|
4
|
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
7
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
test bundle (destination repo): expect 5 revisions
|
|
|
|
this should bundle the same 5 revisions that outgoing reported, but it
|
|
|
|
actually bundles 7
|
|
|
|
$ hg bundle foo.bundle ../repo2
|
|
searching for changes
|
|
5 changesets found
|
|
|
|
test bundle (base revision): expect 5 revisions
|
|
|
|
this should (and does) give exactly the same result as bundle
|
|
|
|
with a destination repo... i.e. it's wrong too
|
|
|
|
$ hg bundle --base 3 foo.bundle
|
|
5 changesets found
|
|
|