sapling/tests/test-pull-branch.t
Kevin Berridge 87ae31d662 pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches
After a pull when new heads are added but no head is added on the current
branch, the "run 'hg merge'" message can be misleading.  This patch doesn't
output the merge message in that scenario.
2011-03-11 20:43:12 -05:00

164 lines
3.8 KiB
Perl

$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo 1 > foo
$ hg ci -Am1 # 0
adding foo
$ hg branch branchA
marked working directory as branch branchA
$ echo a1 > foo
$ hg ci -ma1 # 1
$ cd ..
$ hg init tt
$ cd tt
$ hg pull ../t
pulling from ../t
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files
(run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd ../t
$ echo a2 > foo
$ hg ci -ma2 # 2
Create branch B:
$ hg up 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg branch branchB
marked working directory as branch branchB
$ echo b1 > foo
$ hg ci -mb1 # 3
$ cd ../tt
A new branch is there
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Develop both branches:
$ cd ../t
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a3 > foo
$ hg ci -ma3 # 4
$ hg up branchB
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b2 > foo
$ hg ci -mb2 # 5
$ cd ../tt
Should succeed, no new heads:
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 1 files
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Add a head on other branch:
$ cd ../t
$ hg up branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a4 > foo
$ hg ci -ma4 # 6
$ hg up branchB
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b3.1 > foo
$ hg ci -m b3.1 # 7
$ hg up 5
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b3.2 > foo
$ hg ci -m b3.2 # 8
created new head
$ cd ../tt
Should succeed because there is only one head on our branch:
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 3 changesets with 3 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd ../t
$ hg up -C branchA
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a5.1 > foo
$ hg ci -ma5.1 # 9
$ hg up 6
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a5.2 > foo
$ hg ci -ma5.2 # 10
created new head
$ hg up 7
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b4.1 > foo
$ hg ci -m b4.1 # 11
$ hg up -C 8
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo b4.2 > foo
$ hg ci -m b4.2 # 12
$ cd ../tt
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
not updating, since new heads added
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
Make changes on new branch on tt
$ hg branch branchC
marked working directory as branch branchC
$ echo b1 > bar
$ hg ci -Am "commit on branchC"
adding bar
Make changes on default branch on t
$ cd ../t
$ hg up -C default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo a1 > bar
$ hg ci -Am "commit on default"
adding bar
Pull branchC from tt
$ hg pull ../tt
pulling from ../tt
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads)