mirror of
https://github.com/facebook/sapling.git
synced 2024-10-06 23:07:18 +03:00
15da3ac7f2
When issuing `hg pull -r REV` in a repo with no common ancestor with the remote repo, the message 'requesting all changes' is printed, even though only the changese that are ancestors of REV are actually requested. This can be confusing for users (see http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2010-October/035508.html). This silences the message if (and only if) the '-r' option was passed.
90 lines
2.2 KiB
Perl
90 lines
2.2 KiB
Perl
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
|
|
> import sys
|
|
> print 'Using custom patch'
|
|
> if '--binary' in sys.argv:
|
|
> print '--binary found !'
|
|
> EOF
|
|
|
|
$ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
|
|
$ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH
|
|
|
|
$ hg init a
|
|
$ cd a
|
|
$ echo a > a
|
|
$ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
|
|
adding a
|
|
$ echo b >> a
|
|
$ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
|
|
$ cd ..
|
|
|
|
This test checks that:
|
|
- custom patch commands with arguments actually work
|
|
- patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
|
|
--binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
|
|
--binary is added by default under win32.
|
|
|
|
check custom patch options are honored
|
|
|
|
$ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
|
|
$ hg clone -r 0 a b
|
|
adding changesets
|
|
adding manifests
|
|
adding file changes
|
|
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
|
|
updating to branch default
|
|
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
|
|
$ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
|
|
applying ../a.diff
|
|
Using custom patch
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description
|
|
|
|
Prepare source repo and patch:
|
|
|
|
$ rm $HGRCPATH
|
|
$ hg init c
|
|
$ cd c
|
|
$ echo 0 > a
|
|
$ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
|
|
$ echo 1 >> a
|
|
$ cat << eof > log
|
|
> first line which can't start with '# '
|
|
> # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
|
|
> A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
|
|
> # HG changeset patch
|
|
> # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
|
|
> eof
|
|
$ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
|
|
$ hg export -o p 1
|
|
$ cd ..
|
|
|
|
Clone and apply patch:
|
|
|
|
$ hg clone -r 0 c d
|
|
adding changesets
|
|
adding manifests
|
|
adding file changes
|
|
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
|
|
updating to branch default
|
|
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
$ cd d
|
|
$ hg import ../c/p
|
|
applying ../c/p
|
|
$ hg log -v -r 1
|
|
changeset: 1:e8cc66fbbaa6
|
|
tag: tip
|
|
user: test
|
|
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
|
|
files: a
|
|
description:
|
|
first line which can't start with '# '
|
|
# second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
|
|
A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
|
|
# HG changeset patch
|
|
# User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ cd ..
|