sapling/tests/test-pull-update.t
Brendan Cully ea84333a75 Make pull -u behave like pull && update
Previously, pull would not update if new branch heads were received,
whereas pull && update would move to the tipmost branch head.

Also change the "crosses branches" abort in merge.update from
"crosses branches (merge branches or use --check to force update)"
to
"crosses branches (merge branches or update --check to force update)"

since it can no longer assume the user is running hg update.
2011-05-31 11:52:22 -07:00

62 lines
1.3 KiB
Perl

$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo 1 > foo
$ hg ci -Am m
adding foo
$ cd ..
$ hg clone t tt
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd tt
$ echo 1.1 > foo
$ hg ci -Am m
$ cd ../t
$ echo 1.2 > foo
$ hg ci -Am m
Should not update:
$ hg pull -u ../tt
pulling from ../tt
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
not updating: crosses branches (merge branches or update --check to force update)
$ cd ../tt
Should not update:
$ hg pull -u ../t
pulling from ../t
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
not updating: crosses branches (merge branches or update --check to force update)
$ HGMERGE=true hg merge
merging foo
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg ci -mm
$ cd ../t
Should work:
$ hg pull -u ../tt
pulling from ../tt
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (-1 heads)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved