goabstract/Marketing-for-Engineers
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/goabstract/Marketing-for-Engineers.git synced 2024-10-26 08:29:59 +03:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Added fixes

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Lisa Dziuba 2017-05-25 11:35:44 +03:00 committed by GitHub
parent 3449d1e4eb
commit 1e09408854
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
Contribution_Guidelines.md
View File

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Now all the content is divided in 10 categories. List is organized like a guide
* Please, check your spelling and grammar.
* Feel free to add Emoji.
# 🔗 Link Format
## 🔗 Link Format
Please, use the following format for the links in Pull Requests:
* ``[Title of the Article](link) by Author\Company``.
Feel free to change the title for more clear and appropriate, if needed. Unfortunately, many good marketing articles have a fuzzy clickbait titles, that don't
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ show the meaning of the content. That is good for getting clicks, but not for un
* ``[Name on the tool](link) + how it can help``. Mention, if the tool has a free trial or features.
# ⚠️ Content Requirements
## ⚠️ Content Requirements
* Your submitted content or tool should be useful for other engineers. Obviously, it must be relevant for marketing, analytic, biz dev, sales, PR or growth hacking tasks.
* Content should be up to date, well-written and well-structured. It can be an old article or some popular tool, but it must be relevant.
* Video and podcast should be done in a good English, so engineers from all around the globe could understand it!
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ show the meaning of the content. That is good for getting clicks, but not for un
* Tools can be paid, but it should have a pricing plan for individuals. Please, don’t submit tools, which are oriented on marketing agencies.
# 🔮 General Workflow
## 🔮 General Workflow
We will do our best to review your submission as soon as we can. However, we would love to take a deep look on it and it might take time. Please, consider that we have a full-time job in our startup :)
Your contribution might be rejected, if the content or tool didn't pass our curation. This can be for multiple reasons: poorly written, too much self-promotion, not relevant to the community in general, etc. Of course this is very subjective and if you think we (Lisa and Ahmed) are being unfair, do let us know.