graphql-engine/server/src-lib/Hasura/GraphQL/Schema/RemoteRelationship.hs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

230 lines
11 KiB
Haskell
Raw Normal View History

module Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.RemoteRelationship
( remoteRelationshipField,
)
where
import Control.Lens
import Data.HashMap.Strict.Extended qualified as Map
import Data.List.NonEmpty qualified as NE
import Data.Text.Casing qualified as C
import Data.Text.Extended
import Hasura.Base.Error
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Backend
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Common
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Instances ()
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Options
server: refactor `MonadSchema` into `MonadMemoize` Followup to hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4713. The `memoizeOn` method, part of `MonadSchema`, originally had the following type: ```haskell memoizeOn :: (HasCallStack, Ord a, Typeable a, Typeable b, Typeable k) => TH.Name -> a -> m (Parser k n b) -> m (Parser k n b) ``` The reason for operating on `Parser`s specifically was that the `MonadSchema` effect would additionally initialize certain `Unique` values, which appear (nested in) the type of `Parser`. hasura/graphql-engine-mono#518 changed the type of `memoizeOn`, to additionally allow memoizing `FieldParser`s. These also contained a `Unique` value, which was similarly initialized by the `MonadSchema` effect. The new type of `memoizeOn` was as follows: ```haskell memoizeOn :: forall p d a b . (HasCallStack, HasDefinition (p n b) d, Ord a, Typeable p, Typeable a, Typeable b) => TH.Name -> a -> m (p n b) -> m (p n b) ``` Note the type `p n b` of the value being memoized: by choosing `p` to be either `Parser k` or `FieldParser`, both can be memoized. Also note the new `HasDefinition (p n b) d` constraint, which provided a `Lens` for accessing the `Unique` value to be initialized. A quick simplification is that the `HasCallStack` constraint has never been used by any code. This was realized in hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4713, by removing that constraint. hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2980 removed the `Unique` value from our GraphQL-related types entirely, as their original purpose was never truly realized. One part of removing `Unique` consisted of dropping the `HasDefinition (p n b) d` constraint from `memoizeOn`. What I didn't realize at the time was that this meant that the type of `memoizeOn` could be generalized and simplified much further. This PR finally implements that generalization. The new type is as follows: ```haskell memoizeOn :: forall a p. (Ord a, Typeable a, Typeable p) => TH.Name -> a -> m p -> m p ``` This change has a couple of consequences. 1. While constructing the schema, we often output `Maybe (Parser ...)`, to model that the existence of certain pieces of GraphQL schema sometimes depends on the permissions that a certain role has. The previous versions of `memoizeOn` were not able to handle this, as the only thing they could memoize was fully-defined (if not yet fully-evaluated) `(Field)Parser`s. This much more general API _would_ allow memoizing `Maybe (Parser ...)`s. However, we probably have to be continue being cautious with this: if we blindly memoize all `Maybe (Parser ...)`s, the resulting code may never be able to decide whether the value is `Just` or `Nothing` - i.e. it never commits to the existence-or-not of a GraphQL schema fragment. This would manifest as a non-well-founded knot tying, and this would get reported as an error by the implementation of `memoizeOn`. tl;dr: This generalization _technically_ allows for memoizing `Maybe` values, but we probably still want to avoid doing so. For this reason, the PR adds a specialized version of `memoizeOn` to `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser`. 2. There is no longer any need to connect the `MonadSchema` knot-tying effect with the `MonadParse` effect. In fact, after this PR, the `memoizeOn` method is completely GraphQL-agnostic, and so we implement hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4726, separating `memoizeOn` from `MonadParse` entirely - `memoizeOn` can be defined and implemented as a general Haskell typeclass method. Since `MonadSchema` has been made into a single-type-parameter type class, it has been renamed to something more general, namely `MonadMemoize`. Its only task is to memoize arbitrary `Typeable p` objects under a combined key consisting of a `TH.Name` and a `Typeable a`. Also for this reason, the new `MonadMemoize` has been moved to the more general `Control.Monad.Memoize`. 3. After this change, it's somewhat clearer what `memoizeOn` does: it memoizes an arbitrary value of a `Typeable` type. The only thing that needs to be understood in its implementation is how the manual blackholing works. There is no more semantic interaction with _any_ GraphQL code. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4725 Co-authored-by: Daniel Harvey <4729125+danieljharvey@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 089fa2e82c2ce29da76850e994eabb1e261f9c92
2022-08-04 16:44:14 +03:00
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser (FieldParser, MonadMemoize)
server: Metadata origin for definitions (type parameter version v2) The code that builds the GraphQL schema, and `buildGQLContext` in particular, is partial: not every value of `(ServerConfigCtx, GraphQLQueryType, SourceCache, HashMap RemoteSchemaName (RemoteSchemaCtx, MetadataObject), ActionCache, AnnotatedCustomTypes)` results in a valid GraphQL schema. When it fails, we want to be able to return better error messages than we currently do. The key thing that is missing is a way to trace back GraphQL type information to their origin from the Hasura metadata. Currently, we have a number of correctness checks of our GraphQL schema. But these correctness checks only have access to pure GraphQL type information, and hence can only report errors in terms of that. Possibly the worst is the "conflicting definitions" error, which, in practice, can only be debugged by Hasura engineers. This is terrible DX for customers. This PR allows us to print better error messages, by adding a field to the `Definition` type that traces the GraphQL type to its origin in the metadata. So the idea is simple: just add `MetadataObjId`, or `Maybe` that, or some other sum type of that, to `Definition`. However, we want to avoid having to import a `Hasura.RQL` module from `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser`. So we instead define this additional field of `Definition` through a new type parameter, which is threaded through in `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser`. We then define type synonyms in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser` that fill in this type parameter, so that it is not visible for the majority of the codebase. The idea of associating metadata information to `Definition`s really comes to fruition when combined with hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4517. Their combination would allow us to use the API of fatal errors (just like the current `MonadError QErr`) to report _inconsistencies_ in the metadata. Such inconsistencies are then _automatically_ ignored. So no ad-hoc decisions need to be made on how to cut out inconsistent metadata from the GraphQL schema. This will allow us to report much better errors, as well as improve the likelihood of a successful HGE startup. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4770 Co-authored-by: Samir Talwar <47582+SamirTalwar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 728402b0cae83ae8e83463a826ceeb609001acae
2022-06-28 18:52:26 +03:00
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser qualified as P
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Remote
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Select
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Table
import Hasura.Name qualified as Name
import Hasura.Prelude
import Hasura.RQL.IR qualified as IR
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Common (FieldName, RelType (..), relNameToTxt)
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Relationships.Remote
import Hasura.RQL.Types.ResultCustomization
import Hasura.RQL.Types.SchemaCache hiding (askTableInfo)
2022-05-27 20:21:22 +03:00
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Source
import Hasura.RQL.Types.SourceCustomization
scaffolding for remote-schemas module The main aim of the PR is: 1. To set up a module structure for 'remote-schemas' package. 2. Move parts by the remote schema codebase into the new module structure to validate it. ## Notes to the reviewer Why a PR with large-ish diff? 1. We've been making progress on the MM project but we don't yet know long it is going to take us to get to the first milestone. To understand this better, we need to figure out the unknowns as soon as possible. Hence I've taken a stab at the first two items in the [end-state](https://gist.github.com/0x777/ca2bdc4284d21c3eec153b51dea255c9) document to figure out the unknowns. Unsurprisingly, there are a bunch of issues that we haven't discussed earlier. These are documented in the 'open questions' section. 1. The diff is large but that is only code moved around and I've added a section that documents how things are moved. In addition, there are fair number of PR comments to help with the review process. ## Changes in the PR ### Module structure Sets up the module structure as follows: ``` Hasura/ RemoteSchema/ Metadata/ Types.hs SchemaCache/ Types.hs Permission.hs RemoteRelationship.hs Build.hs MetadataAPI/ Types.hs Execute.hs ``` ### 1. Types representing metadata are moved Types that capture metadata information (currently scattered across several RQL modules) are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types`. - This new module only depends on very 'core' modules such as `Hasura.Session` for the notion of roles and `Hasura.Incremental` for `Cacheable` typeclass. - The requirement on database modules is avoided by generalizing the remote schemas metadata to accept an arbitrary 'r' for a remote relationship definition. ### 2. SchemaCache related types and build logic have been moved Types that represent remote schemas information in SchemaCache are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Types`. Similar to `H.RS.Metadata.Types`, this module depends on 'core' modules except for `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Variable`. It has something to do with remote relationships but I haven't spent time looking into it. The validation of 'remote relationships to remote schema' is also something that needs to be looked at. Rips out the logic that builds remote schema's SchemaCache information from the monolithic `buildSchemaCacheRule` and moves it into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Build`. Further, the `.SchemaCache.Permission` and `.SchemaCache.RemoteRelationship` have been created from existing modules that capture schema cache building logic for those two components. This was a fair amount of work. On main, currently remote schema's SchemaCache information is built in two phases - in the first phase, 'permissions' and 'remote relationships' are ignored and in the second phase they are filled in. While remote relationships can only be resolved after partially resolving sources and other remote schemas, the same isn't true for permissions. Further, most of the work that is done to resolve remote relationships can be moved to the first phase so that the second phase can be a very simple traversal. This is the approach that was taken - resolve permissions and as much as remote relationships information in the first phase. ### 3. Metadata APIs related types and build logic have been moved The types that represent remote schema related metadata APIs and the execution logic have been moved to `Hasura.RemoteSchema.MetadataAPI.Types` and `.Execute` modules respectively. ## Open questions: 1. `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types` is so called because I was hoping that all of the metadata related APIs of remote schema can be brought in at `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.API`. However, as metadata APIs depended on functions from `SchemaCache` module (see [1](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/blob/ceba6d62264603ee5d279814677b29bcc43ecaea/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs#L55) and [2](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/blob/ceba6d62264603ee5d279814677b29bcc43ecaea/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs#L91), it made more sense to create a separate top-level module for `MetadataAPI`s. Maybe we can just have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata` and get rid of the extra nesting or have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.{Core,Permission,RemoteRelationship}` if we want to break them down further. 1. `buildRemoteSchemas` in `H.RS.SchemaCache.Build` has the following type: ```haskell buildRemoteSchemas :: ( ArrowChoice arr, Inc.ArrowDistribute arr, ArrowWriter (Seq CollectedInfo) arr, Inc.ArrowCache m arr, MonadIO m, HasHttpManagerM m, Inc.Cacheable remoteRelationshipDefinition, ToJSON remoteRelationshipDefinition, MonadError QErr m ) => Env.Environment -> ( (Inc.Dependency (HashMap RemoteSchemaName Inc.InvalidationKey), OrderedRoles), [RemoteSchemaMetadataG remoteRelationshipDefinition] ) `arr` HashMap RemoteSchemaName (PartiallyResolvedRemoteSchemaCtxG remoteRelationshipDefinition, MetadataObject) ``` Note the dependence on `CollectedInfo` which is defined as ```haskell data CollectedInfo = CIInconsistency InconsistentMetadata | CIDependency MetadataObject -- ^ for error reporting on missing dependencies SchemaObjId SchemaDependency deriving (Eq) ``` this pretty much means that remote schemas is dependent on types from databases, actions, .... How do we fix this? Maybe introduce a typeclass such as `ArrowCollectRemoteSchemaDependencies` which is defined in `Hasura.RemoteSchema` and then implemented in graphql-engine? 1. The dependency on `buildSchemaCacheFor` in `.MetadataAPI.Execute` which has the following signature: ```haskell buildSchemaCacheFor :: (QErrM m, CacheRWM m, MetadataM m) => MetadataObjId -> MetadataModifier -> ``` This can be easily resolved if we restrict what the metadata APIs are allowed to do. Currently, they operate in an unfettered access to modify SchemaCache (the `CacheRWM` constraint): ```haskell runAddRemoteSchema :: ( QErrM m, CacheRWM m, MonadIO m, HasHttpManagerM m, MetadataM m, Tracing.MonadTrace m ) => Env.Environment -> AddRemoteSchemaQuery -> m EncJSON ``` This should instead be changed to restrict remote schema APIs to only modify remote schema metadata (but has access to the remote schemas part of the schema cache), this dependency is completely removed. ```haskell runAddRemoteSchema :: ( QErrM m, MonadIO m, HasHttpManagerM m, MonadReader RemoteSchemasSchemaCache m, MonadState RemoteSchemaMetadata m, Tracing.MonadTrace m ) => Env.Environment -> AddRemoteSchemaQuery -> m RemoteSchemeMetadataObjId ``` The idea is that the core graphql-engine would call these functions and then call `buildSchemaCacheFor`. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6291 GitOrigin-RevId: 51357148c6404afe70219afa71bd1d59bdf4ffc6
2022-10-21 06:13:07 +03:00
import Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata
import Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache
import Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache qualified as Remote
import Hasura.SQL.AnyBackend
import Hasura.Session
import Language.GraphQL.Draft.Syntax qualified as G
-- | Remote relationship field parsers
remoteRelationshipField ::
SchemaContext ->
SchemaOptions ->
2022-05-27 20:21:22 +03:00
SourceCache ->
RemoteSchemaMap ->
RemoteSchemaPermissions ->
RemoteSourceRelationshipBuilder ->
2022-05-27 20:21:22 +03:00
RemoteRelationshipParserBuilder
remoteRelationshipField schemaContext schemaOptions sourceCache remoteSchemaCache remoteSchemaPermissions remoteSourceRelationshipBuilder = RemoteRelationshipParserBuilder
\RemoteFieldInfo {..} -> lift do
case _rfiRHS of
RFISource anyRemoteSourceFieldInfo ->
-- see Note [SchemaT and stacking]
case remoteSourceRelationshipBuilder of
IncludeRemoteSourceRelationship -> dispatchAnyBackendWithTwoConstraints @BackendSchema @BackendTableSelectSchema
anyRemoteSourceFieldInfo
\remoteSourceFieldInfo -> do
fields <- remoteRelationshipToSourceField schemaContext schemaOptions sourceCache remoteSourceFieldInfo
pure $ Just $ fmap (IR.RemoteSourceField . mkAnyBackend) <$> fields
ExcludeRemoteSourceRelationship -> pure Nothing
RFISchema remoteSchema ->
-- see Note [SchemaT and stacking]
runRemoteSchema schemaContext do
fields <- remoteRelationshipToSchemaField remoteSchemaCache remoteSchemaPermissions _rfiLHS remoteSchema
pure $ fmap (pure . fmap IR.RemoteSchemaField) fields
-- | Parser(s) for remote relationship fields to a remote schema
remoteRelationshipToSchemaField ::
forall r m n lhsJoinField.
(MonadBuildRemoteSchema r m n) =>
2022-05-27 20:21:22 +03:00
RemoteSchemaMap ->
RemoteSchemaPermissions ->
Map.HashMap FieldName lhsJoinField ->
RemoteSchemaFieldInfo ->
SchemaT r m (Maybe (FieldParser n (IR.RemoteSchemaSelect (IR.RemoteRelationshipField IR.UnpreparedValue))))
remoteRelationshipToSchemaField remoteSchemaCache remoteSchemaPermissions lhsFields RemoteSchemaFieldInfo {..} = runMaybeT do
Move RoleName into SchemaContext. ### Description I am not 100% sure about this PR; while I think the code is better this way, I'm willing to be convinced otherwise. In short, this PR moves the `RoleName` field into the `SchemaContext`, instead of being a nebulous `Has RoleName` constraint on the reader monad. The major upside of this is that it makes it an explicit named field, rather than something that must be given as part of a tuple of arguments when calling `runReader`. However, the downside is that it breaks the helper permissions functions of `Schema.Table`, which relied on `Has RoleName r`. This PR makes the choice of passing the role name explicitly to all of those functions, which in turn means first explicitly fetching the role name in a lot of places. It makes it more explicit when a schema building block relies on the role name, but is a bit verbose... ### Alternatives Some alternatives worth considering: - attempting something like `Has context r, Has RoleName context`, which would allow them to be independent from the context but still fetch the role name from the reader, but might require type annotations to not be ambiguous - keeping the permission functions the same, with `Has RoleName r`, and introducing a bunch of newtypes instead of using tuples to explicitly implement all the required `Has` instances - changing the permission functions to `Has SchemaContext r`, since they are functions used only to build the schema, and therefore may be allowed to be tied to the context. What do y'all think? PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/5073 GitOrigin-RevId: 8fd09fafb54905a4d115ef30842d35da0c3db5d2
2022-07-29 18:37:09 +03:00
roleName <- retrieve scRole
remoteSchemaContext <-
Map.lookup _rrfiRemoteSchemaName remoteSchemaCache
`onNothing` throw500 ("invalid remote schema name: " <>> _rrfiRemoteSchemaName)
introspection <- hoistMaybe $ getIntrospectionResult remoteSchemaPermissions roleName remoteSchemaContext
let remoteSchemaRelationships = _rscRemoteRelationships remoteSchemaContext
roleIntrospection = irDoc introspection
remoteSchemaRoot = irQueryRoot introspection
remoteSchemaCustomizer = rsCustomizer $ _rscInfo remoteSchemaContext
RemoteSchemaIntrospection typeDefns = roleIntrospection
let hasuraFieldNames = Map.keysSet lhsFields
relationshipDef = ToSchemaRelationshipDef _rrfiRemoteSchemaName hasuraFieldNames _rrfiRemoteFields
(newInpValDefns :: [G.TypeDefinition [G.Name] RemoteSchemaInputValueDefinition], remoteFieldParamMap) <-
if roleName == adminRoleName
then do
-- we don't validate the remote relationship when the role is admin
-- because it's already been validated, when the remote relationship
-- was created
pure (_rrfiInputValueDefinitions, _rrfiParamMap)
else do
(_, roleRemoteField) <-
afold @(Either _) $
-- TODO: this really needs to go way, we shouldn't be doing
-- validation when building parsers
validateToSchemaRelationship relationshipDef _rrfiLHSIdentifier _rrfiName (_rrfiRemoteSchema, introspection) lhsFields
pure (Remote._rrfiInputValueDefinitions roleRemoteField, Remote._rrfiParamMap roleRemoteField)
let -- add the new input value definitions created by the remote relationship
-- to the existing schema introspection of the role
remoteRelationshipIntrospection = RemoteSchemaIntrospection $ typeDefns <> Map.fromListOn getTypeName newInpValDefns
fieldName <- textToName $ relNameToTxt _rrfiName
-- This selection set parser, should be of the remote node's selection set parser, which comes
-- from the fieldCall
let fieldCalls = unRemoteFields _rrfiRemoteFields
nestedFieldType <- lift $ lookupNestedFieldType remoteSchemaRoot roleIntrospection fieldCalls
let typeName = G.getBaseType nestedFieldType
fieldTypeDefinition <-
onNothing (lookupType roleIntrospection typeName)
-- the below case will never happen because we get the type name
-- from the schema document itself i.e. if a field exists for the
-- given role, then it's return type also must exist
$
throw500 $
"unexpected: " <> typeName <<> " not found "
-- These are the arguments that are given by the user while executing a query
let remoteFieldUserArguments = map snd $ Map.toList remoteFieldParamMap
remoteFld <-
withRemoteSchemaCustomization remoteSchemaCustomizer $
lift $
P.wrapFieldParser nestedFieldType
<$> remoteField remoteRelationshipIntrospection remoteSchemaRelationships remoteSchemaRoot fieldName Nothing remoteFieldUserArguments fieldTypeDefinition
pure $
remoteFld
`P.bindField` \fld@IR.GraphQLField {IR._fArguments = args, IR._fSelectionSet = selSet, IR._fName = fname} -> do
let remoteArgs =
Map.toList args <&> \(argName, argVal) -> IR.RemoteFieldArgument argName $ P.GraphQLValue argVal
let resultCustomizer =
applyFieldCalls fieldCalls $
applyAliasMapping (singletonAliasMapping fname (fcName $ NE.last fieldCalls)) $
makeResultCustomizer remoteSchemaCustomizer fld
pure $
IR.RemoteSchemaSelect
{ IR._rselArgs = remoteArgs,
IR._rselResultCustomizer = resultCustomizer,
IR._rselSelection = selSet,
IR._rselFieldCall = fieldCalls,
IR._rselRemoteSchema = _rrfiRemoteSchema
}
where
-- Apply parent field calls so that the result customizer modifies the nested field
applyFieldCalls :: NonEmpty FieldCall -> ResultCustomizer -> ResultCustomizer
applyFieldCalls fieldCalls resultCustomizer =
foldr (modifyFieldByName . fcName) resultCustomizer $ NE.init fieldCalls
lookupNestedFieldType' ::
server: refactor `MonadSchema` into `MonadMemoize` Followup to hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4713. The `memoizeOn` method, part of `MonadSchema`, originally had the following type: ```haskell memoizeOn :: (HasCallStack, Ord a, Typeable a, Typeable b, Typeable k) => TH.Name -> a -> m (Parser k n b) -> m (Parser k n b) ``` The reason for operating on `Parser`s specifically was that the `MonadSchema` effect would additionally initialize certain `Unique` values, which appear (nested in) the type of `Parser`. hasura/graphql-engine-mono#518 changed the type of `memoizeOn`, to additionally allow memoizing `FieldParser`s. These also contained a `Unique` value, which was similarly initialized by the `MonadSchema` effect. The new type of `memoizeOn` was as follows: ```haskell memoizeOn :: forall p d a b . (HasCallStack, HasDefinition (p n b) d, Ord a, Typeable p, Typeable a, Typeable b) => TH.Name -> a -> m (p n b) -> m (p n b) ``` Note the type `p n b` of the value being memoized: by choosing `p` to be either `Parser k` or `FieldParser`, both can be memoized. Also note the new `HasDefinition (p n b) d` constraint, which provided a `Lens` for accessing the `Unique` value to be initialized. A quick simplification is that the `HasCallStack` constraint has never been used by any code. This was realized in hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4713, by removing that constraint. hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2980 removed the `Unique` value from our GraphQL-related types entirely, as their original purpose was never truly realized. One part of removing `Unique` consisted of dropping the `HasDefinition (p n b) d` constraint from `memoizeOn`. What I didn't realize at the time was that this meant that the type of `memoizeOn` could be generalized and simplified much further. This PR finally implements that generalization. The new type is as follows: ```haskell memoizeOn :: forall a p. (Ord a, Typeable a, Typeable p) => TH.Name -> a -> m p -> m p ``` This change has a couple of consequences. 1. While constructing the schema, we often output `Maybe (Parser ...)`, to model that the existence of certain pieces of GraphQL schema sometimes depends on the permissions that a certain role has. The previous versions of `memoizeOn` were not able to handle this, as the only thing they could memoize was fully-defined (if not yet fully-evaluated) `(Field)Parser`s. This much more general API _would_ allow memoizing `Maybe (Parser ...)`s. However, we probably have to be continue being cautious with this: if we blindly memoize all `Maybe (Parser ...)`s, the resulting code may never be able to decide whether the value is `Just` or `Nothing` - i.e. it never commits to the existence-or-not of a GraphQL schema fragment. This would manifest as a non-well-founded knot tying, and this would get reported as an error by the implementation of `memoizeOn`. tl;dr: This generalization _technically_ allows for memoizing `Maybe` values, but we probably still want to avoid doing so. For this reason, the PR adds a specialized version of `memoizeOn` to `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser`. 2. There is no longer any need to connect the `MonadSchema` knot-tying effect with the `MonadParse` effect. In fact, after this PR, the `memoizeOn` method is completely GraphQL-agnostic, and so we implement hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4726, separating `memoizeOn` from `MonadParse` entirely - `memoizeOn` can be defined and implemented as a general Haskell typeclass method. Since `MonadSchema` has been made into a single-type-parameter type class, it has been renamed to something more general, namely `MonadMemoize`. Its only task is to memoize arbitrary `Typeable p` objects under a combined key consisting of a `TH.Name` and a `Typeable a`. Also for this reason, the new `MonadMemoize` has been moved to the more general `Control.Monad.Memoize`. 3. After this change, it's somewhat clearer what `memoizeOn` does: it memoizes an arbitrary value of a `Typeable` type. The only thing that needs to be understood in its implementation is how the manual blackholing works. There is no more semantic interaction with _any_ GraphQL code. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4725 Co-authored-by: Daniel Harvey <4729125+danieljharvey@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 089fa2e82c2ce29da76850e994eabb1e261f9c92
2022-08-04 16:44:14 +03:00
(MonadMemoize m, MonadError QErr m) =>
G.Name ->
RemoteSchemaIntrospection ->
FieldCall ->
SchemaT r m G.GType
lookupNestedFieldType' parentTypeName remoteSchemaIntrospection (FieldCall fcName _) =
case lookupObject remoteSchemaIntrospection parentTypeName of
Nothing -> throw400 RemoteSchemaError $ "object with name " <> parentTypeName <<> " not found"
Just G.ObjectTypeDefinition {..} ->
case find ((== fcName) . G._fldName) _otdFieldsDefinition of
Nothing -> throw400 RemoteSchemaError $ "field with name " <> fcName <<> " not found"
Just G.FieldDefinition {..} -> pure _fldType
lookupNestedFieldType ::
server: refactor `MonadSchema` into `MonadMemoize` Followup to hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4713. The `memoizeOn` method, part of `MonadSchema`, originally had the following type: ```haskell memoizeOn :: (HasCallStack, Ord a, Typeable a, Typeable b, Typeable k) => TH.Name -> a -> m (Parser k n b) -> m (Parser k n b) ``` The reason for operating on `Parser`s specifically was that the `MonadSchema` effect would additionally initialize certain `Unique` values, which appear (nested in) the type of `Parser`. hasura/graphql-engine-mono#518 changed the type of `memoizeOn`, to additionally allow memoizing `FieldParser`s. These also contained a `Unique` value, which was similarly initialized by the `MonadSchema` effect. The new type of `memoizeOn` was as follows: ```haskell memoizeOn :: forall p d a b . (HasCallStack, HasDefinition (p n b) d, Ord a, Typeable p, Typeable a, Typeable b) => TH.Name -> a -> m (p n b) -> m (p n b) ``` Note the type `p n b` of the value being memoized: by choosing `p` to be either `Parser k` or `FieldParser`, both can be memoized. Also note the new `HasDefinition (p n b) d` constraint, which provided a `Lens` for accessing the `Unique` value to be initialized. A quick simplification is that the `HasCallStack` constraint has never been used by any code. This was realized in hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4713, by removing that constraint. hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2980 removed the `Unique` value from our GraphQL-related types entirely, as their original purpose was never truly realized. One part of removing `Unique` consisted of dropping the `HasDefinition (p n b) d` constraint from `memoizeOn`. What I didn't realize at the time was that this meant that the type of `memoizeOn` could be generalized and simplified much further. This PR finally implements that generalization. The new type is as follows: ```haskell memoizeOn :: forall a p. (Ord a, Typeable a, Typeable p) => TH.Name -> a -> m p -> m p ``` This change has a couple of consequences. 1. While constructing the schema, we often output `Maybe (Parser ...)`, to model that the existence of certain pieces of GraphQL schema sometimes depends on the permissions that a certain role has. The previous versions of `memoizeOn` were not able to handle this, as the only thing they could memoize was fully-defined (if not yet fully-evaluated) `(Field)Parser`s. This much more general API _would_ allow memoizing `Maybe (Parser ...)`s. However, we probably have to be continue being cautious with this: if we blindly memoize all `Maybe (Parser ...)`s, the resulting code may never be able to decide whether the value is `Just` or `Nothing` - i.e. it never commits to the existence-or-not of a GraphQL schema fragment. This would manifest as a non-well-founded knot tying, and this would get reported as an error by the implementation of `memoizeOn`. tl;dr: This generalization _technically_ allows for memoizing `Maybe` values, but we probably still want to avoid doing so. For this reason, the PR adds a specialized version of `memoizeOn` to `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser`. 2. There is no longer any need to connect the `MonadSchema` knot-tying effect with the `MonadParse` effect. In fact, after this PR, the `memoizeOn` method is completely GraphQL-agnostic, and so we implement hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4726, separating `memoizeOn` from `MonadParse` entirely - `memoizeOn` can be defined and implemented as a general Haskell typeclass method. Since `MonadSchema` has been made into a single-type-parameter type class, it has been renamed to something more general, namely `MonadMemoize`. Its only task is to memoize arbitrary `Typeable p` objects under a combined key consisting of a `TH.Name` and a `Typeable a`. Also for this reason, the new `MonadMemoize` has been moved to the more general `Control.Monad.Memoize`. 3. After this change, it's somewhat clearer what `memoizeOn` does: it memoizes an arbitrary value of a `Typeable` type. The only thing that needs to be understood in its implementation is how the manual blackholing works. There is no more semantic interaction with _any_ GraphQL code. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4725 Co-authored-by: Daniel Harvey <4729125+danieljharvey@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 089fa2e82c2ce29da76850e994eabb1e261f9c92
2022-08-04 16:44:14 +03:00
(MonadMemoize m, MonadError QErr m) =>
G.Name ->
RemoteSchemaIntrospection ->
NonEmpty FieldCall ->
SchemaT r m G.GType
lookupNestedFieldType parentTypeName remoteSchemaIntrospection (fieldCall :| rest) = do
fieldType <- lookupNestedFieldType' parentTypeName remoteSchemaIntrospection fieldCall
case NE.nonEmpty rest of
Nothing -> pure fieldType
Just rest' -> do
lookupNestedFieldType (G.getBaseType fieldType) remoteSchemaIntrospection rest'
-- | Parser(s) for remote relationship fields to a database table.
-- Note that when the target is a database table, an array relationship
-- declaration would have the '_aggregate' field in addition to the array
-- relationship field, hence [FieldParser ...] instead of 'FieldParser'
remoteRelationshipToSourceField ::
forall m n tgt.
( MonadError QErr m,
P.MonadMemoize m,
P.MonadParse n,
BackendSchema tgt,
BackendTableSelectSchema tgt
) =>
SchemaContext ->
SchemaOptions ->
2022-05-27 20:21:22 +03:00
SourceCache ->
RemoteSourceFieldInfo tgt ->
m [FieldParser n (IR.RemoteSourceSelect (IR.RemoteRelationshipField IR.UnpreparedValue) IR.UnpreparedValue tgt)]
remoteRelationshipToSourceField context options sourceCache RemoteSourceFieldInfo {..} = do
Resolve source customization at schema cache building time. ### Description This PR attempts to fix several issues with source customization as it relates to remote relationships. There were several issues regarding casing: at the relationship border, we didn't properly set the target source's case, we didn't have access to the list of supported features to decide whether the feature was allowed or not, and we didn't have access to the global default. However, all of that information is available when we build the schema cache, as we do resolve the case of some elements such as function names: we can therefore resolve source information at the same time, and simplify both the root of the schema and the remote relationship border. To do this, this PR introduces a new type, `ResolvedSourceCustomization`, to be used in the Schema Cache, as opposed to the metadata's `SourceCustomization`, following a pattern established by a lot of other types. ### Remaining work and open questions One major point of confusion: it seems to me that we didn't set the case at all across remote relationships, which would suggest we would use the case of the LHS source across the subset of the RHS one that is accessible through the remote relationship, which would in turn "corrupt" the parser cache and might result in the wrong case being used for that source later on. Is that assesment correct, and was I right to fix it? Another one is that we seem not to be using the local case of the RHS to name the field in an object relationship; unless I'm mistaken we only use it for array relationships? Is that intentional? This PR is also missing tests that would show-case the difference, and a changelog entry. To my knowledge, all the tests of this feature are in the python test suite; this could be the opportunity to move them to the hspec suite, but this might be a considerable amount of work? PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/5619 GitOrigin-RevId: 51a81b713a74575e82d9f96b51633f158ce3a47b
2022-09-12 19:05:40 +03:00
sourceInfo <-
onNothing (unsafeSourceInfo @tgt =<< Map.lookup _rsfiSource sourceCache) $
throw500 $
"source not found " <> dquote _rsfiSource
runSourceSchema context options sourceInfo do
let roleName = scRole context
tCase = _rscNamingConvention $ _siCustomization sourceInfo
tableInfo <- askTableInfo _rsfiTable
fieldName <- textToName $ relNameToTxt _rsfiName
Move RoleName into SchemaContext. ### Description I am not 100% sure about this PR; while I think the code is better this way, I'm willing to be convinced otherwise. In short, this PR moves the `RoleName` field into the `SchemaContext`, instead of being a nebulous `Has RoleName` constraint on the reader monad. The major upside of this is that it makes it an explicit named field, rather than something that must be given as part of a tuple of arguments when calling `runReader`. However, the downside is that it breaks the helper permissions functions of `Schema.Table`, which relied on `Has RoleName r`. This PR makes the choice of passing the role name explicitly to all of those functions, which in turn means first explicitly fetching the role name in a lot of places. It makes it more explicit when a schema building block relies on the role name, but is a bit verbose... ### Alternatives Some alternatives worth considering: - attempting something like `Has context r, Has RoleName context`, which would allow them to be independent from the context but still fetch the role name from the reader, but might require type annotations to not be ambiguous - keeping the permission functions the same, with `Has RoleName r`, and introducing a bunch of newtypes instead of using tuples to explicitly implement all the required `Has` instances - changing the permission functions to `Has SchemaContext r`, since they are functions used only to build the schema, and therefore may be allowed to be tied to the context. What do y'all think? PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/5073 GitOrigin-RevId: 8fd09fafb54905a4d115ef30842d35da0c3db5d2
2022-07-29 18:37:09 +03:00
case tableSelectPermissions @tgt roleName tableInfo of
Nothing -> pure []
Just tablePerms -> do
parsers <- case _rsfiType of
ObjRel -> do
selectionSetParserM <- tableSelectionSet tableInfo
Role-invariant schema constructors We build the GraphQL schema by combining building blocks such as `tableSelectionSet` and `columnParser`. These building blocks individually build `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects. Those object specify the valid GraphQL schema. Since the GraphQL schema is role-dependent, at some point we need to know what fragment of the GraphQL schema a specific role is allowed to access, and this is stored in `{Sel,Upd,Ins,Del}PermInfo` objects. We have passed around these permission objects as function arguments to the schema building blocks since we first started dealing with permissions during the PDV refactor - see hasura/graphql-engine@5168b99e463199b1934d8645bd6cd37eddb64ae1 in hasura/graphql-engine#4111. This means that, for instance, `tableSelectionSet` has as its type: ```haskell tableSelectionSet :: forall b r m n. MonadBuildSchema b r m n => SourceName -> TableInfo b -> SelPermInfo b -> m (Parser 'Output n (AnnotatedFields b)) ``` There are three reasons to change this. 1. We often pass a `Maybe (xPermInfo b)` instead of a proper `xPermInfo b`, and it's not clear what the intended semantics of this is. Some potential improvements on the data types involved are discussed in issue hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3125. 2. In most cases we also already pass a `TableInfo b`, and together with the `MonadRole` that is usually also in scope, this means that we could look up the required permissions regardless: so passing the permissions explicitly undermines the "single source of truth" principle. Breaking this principle also makes the code more difficult to read. 3. We are working towards role-based parsers (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2711), where the `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects are constructed in a role-invariant way, so that we have a single object that can be used for all roles. In particular, this means that the schema building blocks _need_ to be constructed in a role-invariant way. While this PR doesn't accomplish that, it does reduce the amount of role-specific arguments being passed, thus fixing hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3068. Concretely, this PR simply drops the `xPermInfo b` argument from almost all schema building blocks. Instead these objects are looked up from the `TableInfo b` as-needed. The resulting code is considerably simpler and shorter. One way to interpret this change is as follows. Before this PR, we figured out permissions at the top-level in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, passing down the obtained `xPermInfo` objects as required. After this PR, we have a bottom-up approach where the schema building blocks themselves decide whether they want to be included for a particular role. So this moves some permission logic out of `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, which is very complex. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3608 GitOrigin-RevId: 51a744f34ec7d57bc8077667ae7f9cb9c4f6c962
2022-02-17 11:16:20 +03:00
pure $ case selectionSetParserM of
Nothing -> []
Just selectionSetParser ->
pure $
server: Metadata origin for definitions (type parameter version v2) The code that builds the GraphQL schema, and `buildGQLContext` in particular, is partial: not every value of `(ServerConfigCtx, GraphQLQueryType, SourceCache, HashMap RemoteSchemaName (RemoteSchemaCtx, MetadataObject), ActionCache, AnnotatedCustomTypes)` results in a valid GraphQL schema. When it fails, we want to be able to return better error messages than we currently do. The key thing that is missing is a way to trace back GraphQL type information to their origin from the Hasura metadata. Currently, we have a number of correctness checks of our GraphQL schema. But these correctness checks only have access to pure GraphQL type information, and hence can only report errors in terms of that. Possibly the worst is the "conflicting definitions" error, which, in practice, can only be debugged by Hasura engineers. This is terrible DX for customers. This PR allows us to print better error messages, by adding a field to the `Definition` type that traces the GraphQL type to its origin in the metadata. So the idea is simple: just add `MetadataObjId`, or `Maybe` that, or some other sum type of that, to `Definition`. However, we want to avoid having to import a `Hasura.RQL` module from `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser`. So we instead define this additional field of `Definition` through a new type parameter, which is threaded through in `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser`. We then define type synonyms in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser` that fill in this type parameter, so that it is not visible for the majority of the codebase. The idea of associating metadata information to `Definition`s really comes to fruition when combined with hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4517. Their combination would allow us to use the API of fatal errors (just like the current `MonadError QErr`) to report _inconsistencies_ in the metadata. Such inconsistencies are then _automatically_ ignored. So no ad-hoc decisions need to be made on how to cut out inconsistent metadata from the GraphQL schema. This will allow us to report much better errors, as well as improve the likelihood of a successful HGE startup. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4770 Co-authored-by: Samir Talwar <47582+SamirTalwar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 728402b0cae83ae8e83463a826ceeb609001acae
2022-06-28 18:52:26 +03:00
P.subselection_ fieldName Nothing selectionSetParser <&> \fields ->
Role-invariant schema constructors We build the GraphQL schema by combining building blocks such as `tableSelectionSet` and `columnParser`. These building blocks individually build `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects. Those object specify the valid GraphQL schema. Since the GraphQL schema is role-dependent, at some point we need to know what fragment of the GraphQL schema a specific role is allowed to access, and this is stored in `{Sel,Upd,Ins,Del}PermInfo` objects. We have passed around these permission objects as function arguments to the schema building blocks since we first started dealing with permissions during the PDV refactor - see hasura/graphql-engine@5168b99e463199b1934d8645bd6cd37eddb64ae1 in hasura/graphql-engine#4111. This means that, for instance, `tableSelectionSet` has as its type: ```haskell tableSelectionSet :: forall b r m n. MonadBuildSchema b r m n => SourceName -> TableInfo b -> SelPermInfo b -> m (Parser 'Output n (AnnotatedFields b)) ``` There are three reasons to change this. 1. We often pass a `Maybe (xPermInfo b)` instead of a proper `xPermInfo b`, and it's not clear what the intended semantics of this is. Some potential improvements on the data types involved are discussed in issue hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3125. 2. In most cases we also already pass a `TableInfo b`, and together with the `MonadRole` that is usually also in scope, this means that we could look up the required permissions regardless: so passing the permissions explicitly undermines the "single source of truth" principle. Breaking this principle also makes the code more difficult to read. 3. We are working towards role-based parsers (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2711), where the `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects are constructed in a role-invariant way, so that we have a single object that can be used for all roles. In particular, this means that the schema building blocks _need_ to be constructed in a role-invariant way. While this PR doesn't accomplish that, it does reduce the amount of role-specific arguments being passed, thus fixing hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3068. Concretely, this PR simply drops the `xPermInfo b` argument from almost all schema building blocks. Instead these objects are looked up from the `TableInfo b` as-needed. The resulting code is considerably simpler and shorter. One way to interpret this change is as follows. Before this PR, we figured out permissions at the top-level in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, passing down the obtained `xPermInfo` objects as required. After this PR, we have a bottom-up approach where the schema building blocks themselves decide whether they want to be included for a particular role. So this moves some permission logic out of `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, which is very complex. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3608 GitOrigin-RevId: 51a744f34ec7d57bc8077667ae7f9cb9c4f6c962
2022-02-17 11:16:20 +03:00
IR.SourceRelationshipObject $
IR.AnnObjectSelectG fields _rsfiTable $
IR._tpFilter $
tablePermissionsInfo tablePerms
ArrRel -> do
let aggFieldName = applyFieldNameCaseIdentifier tCase $ C.fromAutogeneratedTuple (fieldName, [G.convertNameToSuffix Name._aggregate])
selectionSetParser <- selectTable tableInfo fieldName Nothing
aggSelectionSetParser <- selectTableAggregate tableInfo aggFieldName Nothing
pure $
catMaybes
Role-invariant schema constructors We build the GraphQL schema by combining building blocks such as `tableSelectionSet` and `columnParser`. These building blocks individually build `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects. Those object specify the valid GraphQL schema. Since the GraphQL schema is role-dependent, at some point we need to know what fragment of the GraphQL schema a specific role is allowed to access, and this is stored in `{Sel,Upd,Ins,Del}PermInfo` objects. We have passed around these permission objects as function arguments to the schema building blocks since we first started dealing with permissions during the PDV refactor - see hasura/graphql-engine@5168b99e463199b1934d8645bd6cd37eddb64ae1 in hasura/graphql-engine#4111. This means that, for instance, `tableSelectionSet` has as its type: ```haskell tableSelectionSet :: forall b r m n. MonadBuildSchema b r m n => SourceName -> TableInfo b -> SelPermInfo b -> m (Parser 'Output n (AnnotatedFields b)) ``` There are three reasons to change this. 1. We often pass a `Maybe (xPermInfo b)` instead of a proper `xPermInfo b`, and it's not clear what the intended semantics of this is. Some potential improvements on the data types involved are discussed in issue hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3125. 2. In most cases we also already pass a `TableInfo b`, and together with the `MonadRole` that is usually also in scope, this means that we could look up the required permissions regardless: so passing the permissions explicitly undermines the "single source of truth" principle. Breaking this principle also makes the code more difficult to read. 3. We are working towards role-based parsers (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2711), where the `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects are constructed in a role-invariant way, so that we have a single object that can be used for all roles. In particular, this means that the schema building blocks _need_ to be constructed in a role-invariant way. While this PR doesn't accomplish that, it does reduce the amount of role-specific arguments being passed, thus fixing hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3068. Concretely, this PR simply drops the `xPermInfo b` argument from almost all schema building blocks. Instead these objects are looked up from the `TableInfo b` as-needed. The resulting code is considerably simpler and shorter. One way to interpret this change is as follows. Before this PR, we figured out permissions at the top-level in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, passing down the obtained `xPermInfo` objects as required. After this PR, we have a bottom-up approach where the schema building blocks themselves decide whether they want to be included for a particular role. So this moves some permission logic out of `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, which is very complex. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3608 GitOrigin-RevId: 51a744f34ec7d57bc8077667ae7f9cb9c4f6c962
2022-02-17 11:16:20 +03:00
[ selectionSetParser <&> fmap IR.SourceRelationshipArray,
aggSelectionSetParser <&> fmap IR.SourceRelationshipArrayAggregate
]
pure $
parsers <&> fmap \select ->
IR.RemoteSourceSelect _rsfiSource _rsfiSourceConfig select _rsfiMapping (soStringifyNumbers options)