mirror of
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine.git
synced 2024-12-14 17:02:49 +03:00
92 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
92 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
|
At the top level we have a `cabal.project` file that defines project
|
||
|
configuration settings that stay the same, regardless of whether we're doing
|
||
|
local development, building on CI, etc.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Additionally in this directory we have various `cabal.project.local` files that
|
||
|
add or override settings depending on context:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- `ci-*.project.local` - these are used when building in CI (see `.buildkite/`)
|
||
|
- `dev-sh.project.local` - this is used to configure the environment we expect in
|
||
|
`scripts/dev.sh`, and is where we put good local development defaults
|
||
|
- `dev-sh-optimized.project.local` - above, but building with optimizations,
|
||
|
suitable for prod-like performance testing
|
||
|
- `dev-sh-prof-*.project.local` - Various profiling modes (see below)
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Because we can only gives us `--project-file` to select configuration, we need
|
||
|
each of these local overrides to have a symlink back to the top-level
|
||
|
`cabal.project`. So e.g. if you wanted to build with CI settings locally you
|
||
|
would do:
|
||
|
|
||
|
$ cabal build --project-file=cabal/ci.project exe:graphql-engine
|
||
|
|
||
|
Likewise for the freeze file symlinks.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In cabal-install 3.8 we can have `import`s, which we also use.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Here's a helper for making new configurations:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
function hasura_new_sub_config () {
|
||
|
cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/cabal"
|
||
|
ln -s ../cabal.project.freeze "$1.project.freeze"
|
||
|
ln -s ../cabal.project "$1.project"
|
||
|
touch "$1.project.local"
|
||
|
echo "continue editing: $1.project.local"
|
||
|
cd - &>/dev/null
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Profiling modes
|
||
|
|
||
|
See the `graphql-engine --prof-*` flags in `dev.sh` for the happy path to use these modes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### `+RTS -hi`(info map) Heap Profiles
|
||
|
|
||
|
Every distinct constructure allocation site is instrumented with source code
|
||
|
information
|
||
|
|
||
|
See: `dev-sh-prof-heap-infomap.project.local`
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Try it when**: you want to go deeper debugging high resident memory during development
|
||
|
- **Benefits**: doesn't inhibit optimizations, very granular
|
||
|
- **Downsides**: must recompile, binary sizes can get large, sometimes source info is confusing
|
||
|
|
||
|
### ghc-debug
|
||
|
|
||
|
A set of client and server libraries for snapshotting and arbitrarily analyzing
|
||
|
the Haskell heap
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Try it when**: you need to answer any sort of complex question about what's in memory; e.g.
|
||
|
why is something retained? do we have many identical strings and memory?
|
||
|
- **Benefits**: extremely powerful, can run on production without restart
|
||
|
- **Downsides**: analysis passes can take time to write and debug, analyzing large heaps requires care
|
||
|
|
||
|
### “Ticky ticky” profiling
|
||
|
|
||
|
Generates a report for all allocations even those that are very short-lived;
|
||
|
quasi- time profiling
|
||
|
|
||
|
See: `dev-sh-prof-ticky.project.local`
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Try it when**: debugging a regression and bytes allocated, comparing two different versions of code
|
||
|
- **Benefits**: see and compare allocations directly, doesn't inhibit optimizations
|
||
|
- **Downsides**: STG can take time to decipher, the program gets very slow, not suitable for production
|
||
|
|
||
|
### `-fprof-late` time profiling
|
||
|
|
||
|
**NOT YET IMPLEMENTED**
|
||
|
|
||
|
Time profiling that instruments code after all significant optimizations have
|
||
|
been performed, so it doesn't distort the profile (on 9.4+ only, but plug-in
|
||
|
available)
|
||
|
|
||
|
See: `dev-sh-prof-time.project.local`
|
||
|
|
||
|
- **Try it when**: you want to try to make some code faster, or understand where the time is being spent in the system
|
||
|
- **Benefits**: get call stacks, granular view of execution time
|
||
|
- **Downsides**: requires recompilation, STG can be confusing, not suitable for production
|