graphql-engine/server/src-test/Hasura/RQL/MetadataSpec.hs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

407 lines
13 KiB
Haskell
Raw Normal View History

{-# LANGUAGE QuasiQuotes #-}
module Hasura.RQL.MetadataSpec
( spec,
-- ** Test Helpers
trippingJSON,
trippingJSONValue,
trippingJSONEncoding,
)
where
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
import Control.Lens ((%~), (.~), (^?!))
import Data.Aeson (FromJSON, ToJSON)
import Data.Aeson qualified as Aeson
import Data.Aeson.KeyMap qualified as KM
import Data.Aeson.Lens (key, _Object)
import Data.HashMap.Strict qualified as HM
import Data.Proxy (Proxy (..))
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
import Data.Text qualified as T
import Data.Typeable (Typeable, typeRep)
import Data.Yaml.TH (yamlQQ)
import GHC.Stack (HasCallStack)
import Hasura.Prelude hiding ((%~))
import Hasura.RQL.DDL.RemoteRelationship
( CreateFromSourceRelationship,
)
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Metadata (Metadata)
import Hasura.SQL.Backend (BackendType (BigQuery, MSSQL, Postgres), PostgresKind (Vanilla))
import Hasura.Server.API.Metadata (RQLMetadataV1)
import Hasura.Server.API.Query qualified as V1 (RQLQuery)
import Hedgehog (MonadTest, evalEither, tripping)
import Test.Hspec (Spec, describe, expectationFailure, it, shouldContain)
import Test.Hspec.Hedgehog (hedgehog)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
spec :: Spec
spec = describe "Remote Relationship Metadata" do
spec_roundtrip
spec_Metadata_examples
spec_RQLQuery_examples
spec_RQLMetadataV1_examples
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
spec_roundtrip :: Spec
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
spec_roundtrip = describe "JSON Roundtrip" do
describe "Metadata" do
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
it "example remote relationship fragment" $
hedgehog do
metadata :: Metadata <-
evalAesonResult $
Aeson.fromJSON remote_relationship_metadata_fragment
trippingJSONValue metadata
describe "CreateFromSourceRelationship" do
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
it "'pg_create_remote_relationship' query" $
hedgehog $ do
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
let argument = mk_pg_remote_relationship_argument "create" ^?! key "args"
cfsr :: (CreateFromSourceRelationship ('Postgres 'Vanilla)) <-
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
evalAesonResult $ Aeson.fromJSON argument
trippingJSON cfsr
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
it "'pg_create_remote_relationship' query with the 'old' schema" $
hedgehog $ do
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
let argument = mk_pg_remote_relationship_old_argument "create" ^?! key "args"
cfsr :: (CreateFromSourceRelationship ('Postgres 'Vanilla)) <-
evalAesonResult $ Aeson.fromJSON argument
trippingJSON cfsr
it "'mssql_create_remote_relationship' query" $
hedgehog $ do
let argument = mk_mssql_remote_relationship_argument "create" ^?! key "args"
cfsr :: (CreateFromSourceRelationship 'MSSQL) <-
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
evalAesonResult $ Aeson.fromJSON argument
trippingJSON cfsr
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
it "'bigquery_create_remote_relationship' query" $
hedgehog $ do
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
let argument = mk_bigquery_remote_relationship_argument "create" ^?! key "args"
cfsr :: (CreateFromSourceRelationship 'BigQuery) <-
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
evalAesonResult $ Aeson.fromJSON argument
trippingJSON cfsr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
spec_Metadata_examples :: Spec
spec_Metadata_examples = describe "Metadata" $ do
it "parses an example remote relationship metadata fragment" do
decodesJSON @Metadata remote_relationship_metadata_fragment
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
spec_RQLQuery_examples :: Spec
spec_RQLQuery_examples = describe "V1 RQLQuery" do
it "parses a 'create_remote_relationship' query with the 'new' schema" do
decodesJSON @V1.RQLQuery
[yamlQQ|
type: create_remote_relationship
args:
name: message
table: profiles
definition:
to_remote_schema:
lhs_fields:
- id
- name
remote_schema: my-remote-schema
remote_field:
message:
arguments:
id: "$id"
|]
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
it "parses a 'create_remote_relationship' query with the 'old' schema" do
decodesJSON @V1.RQLQuery
[yamlQQ|
type: create_remote_relationship
args:
name: message
table: profiles
hasura_fields:
- id
- name
remote_schema: my-remote-schema
remote_field:
message:
arguments:
id: "$id"
|]
it "rejects a 'create_remote_relationship' query with the combination 'new+old' schema" do
rejectsJSON @V1.RQLQuery
"expects exactly one of: to_source, to_remote_schema"
[yamlQQ|
type: create_remote_relationship
args:
name: message
table: profiles
# Note remote_schema nested under definition!
definition:
hasura_fields:
- id
- name
remote_schema: my-remote-schema
remote_field:
message:
arguments:
id: "$id"
|]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
spec_RQLMetadataV1_examples :: Spec
spec_RQLMetadataV1_examples = describe "RQLMetadataV1" do
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
describe "Success" do
for_ ["create", "update", "delete"] \action ->
it ("parses a 'pg_" <> T.unpack action <> "_remote_relationship query") do
decodesJSON @RQLMetadataV1 $ mk_pg_remote_relationship_argument action
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
for_ ["create", "update", "delete"] \action ->
it ("parses a 'pg_" <> T.unpack action <> "_remote_relationship query using the 'old' schema") do
decodesJSON @RQLMetadataV1 $ mk_pg_remote_relationship_old_argument action
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
for_ ["create", "update", "delete"] \action ->
it ("parses a 'citus_" <> T.unpack action <> "_remote_relationship query") do
decodesJSON @RQLMetadataV1 $ mk_citus_remote_relationship_argument action
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
for_ ["create", "update", "delete"] \action ->
it ("parses a 'bigquery_" <> T.unpack action <> "_remote_relationship query") do
decodesJSON @RQLMetadataV1 $ mk_bigquery_remote_relationship_argument action
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
for_ ["create", "update", "delete"] \action ->
it ("parses a 'mssql_" <> T.unpack action <> "_remote_relationship query") do
decodesJSON @RQLMetadataV1 $ mk_mssql_remote_relationship_argument action
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
describe "Failure" do
for_ ["create", "update"] \action ->
it ("fails to parse a 'pg_" <> T.unpack action <> "_remote_relationship query using the 'old+new' schema") do
rejectsJSON @RQLMetadataV1
"expects exactly one of: to_source, to_remote_schema"
$ mk_pg_remote_relationship_old_new_argument action
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Example YAML fragments for the metadata and query tests above.
remote_relationship_metadata_fragment :: Aeson.Value
remote_relationship_metadata_fragment =
[yamlQQ|
version: 3
sources:
- name: something
kind: postgres
configuration:
connection_info:
database_url: something
tables:
- table: test
remote_relationships:
- name: remote
definition:
hasura_fields: [id]
remote_field:
some_fiend_name:
arguments:
id: $id
remote_schema: some_remote_schema_name
|]
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
-- | Backend-agnostic @v1/metadata@ argument fragment which omits the @type@
-- field.
--
-- This should be used to construct backend-specific fragments by adding the
-- correct type and/or modifying any of the fields specified here as needed.
--
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
-- See 'mk_backend_remote_relationship_argument for example usage.
backend_create_remote_relationship_fragment :: Aeson.Value
backend_create_remote_relationship_fragment =
[yamlQQ|
args:
name: message
table: profiles
definition:
to_remote_schema:
lhs_fields:
- id
- name
remote_schema: my-remote-schema
remote_field:
message:
arguments:
id: "$id"
|]
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
-- | Constructor for @v1/metadata@ @<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship@
-- arguments using the new, unified schema.
--
-- See 'mk_pg_backend_remote_relationship_argument for example usage.
mk_backend_remote_relationship_argument :: Text -> Text -> Aeson.Value
mk_backend_remote_relationship_argument backend action =
backend_create_remote_relationship_fragment
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
& _Object
%~ HM.insert
("type" :: Text)
(Aeson.String $ backend <> "_" <> action <> "_remote_relationship")
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
-- | Constructor for @v1/metadata@ @mssql_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship@
-- arguments using the new, unified schema.
mk_mssql_remote_relationship_argument :: Text -> Aeson.Value
mk_mssql_remote_relationship_argument action =
mk_backend_remote_relationship_argument "mssql" action
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
-- | Constructor for @v1/metadata@ @citus_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship@
-- arguments using the new, unified schema.
mk_citus_remote_relationship_argument :: Text -> Aeson.Value
mk_citus_remote_relationship_argument action =
mk_backend_remote_relationship_argument "citus" action
-- | Constructor for @v1/metadata@ @pg_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship@
-- arguments using the new, unified schema.
mk_pg_remote_relationship_argument :: Text -> Aeson.Value
mk_pg_remote_relationship_argument action =
mk_backend_remote_relationship_argument "pg" action
-- | Constructor for @v1/metadata@ @bigquery_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship@
-- arguments using the new, unified schema.
--
-- NOTE: The 'BigQuery' backend expects its @table@ argument to be of type
-- 'Aeson.Object' (all of the other backends support 'Aeson.String').
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
mk_bigquery_remote_relationship_argument :: Text -> Aeson.Value
mk_bigquery_remote_relationship_argument action =
mk_backend_remote_relationship_argument "bigquery" action
& key "args" . key "table"
.~ Aeson.Object
( KM.fromList
[ ("name", "profiles"),
("dataset", "test")
]
)
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
-- | Constructor for @v1/metadata@ @pg_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship@
-- arguments using the old, non-unified schema.
mk_pg_remote_relationship_old_argument :: Text -> Aeson.Value
mk_pg_remote_relationship_old_argument action =
fragment
& _Object
%~ HM.insert
("type" :: Text)
(Aeson.String $ "pg_" <> action <> "_remote_relationship")
where
fragment =
[yamlQQ|
args:
name: message
Fix several issues with remote relationships. ## Remaining Work - [x] changelog entry - [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested - [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support - [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary - [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170 - [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~ - ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~ - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171 - [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~ - cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920 - deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172 ## Description This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API. - it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console) - it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124) - it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149) Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues: - THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because: - `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres. As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157 Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
2021-12-16 23:28:08 +03:00
table: profiles
hasura_fields:
- id
- name
remote_schema: my-remote-schema
remote_field:
message:
arguments:
id: "$id"
|]
-- | Constructor for @v1/metadata@ @pg_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship@
-- arguments using a mix of the old and new schema.
mk_pg_remote_relationship_old_new_argument :: Text -> Aeson.Value
mk_pg_remote_relationship_old_new_argument action =
fragment
& _Object
%~ HM.insert
("type" :: Text)
(Aeson.String $ "pg_" <> action <> "_remote_relationship")
where
fragment =
[yamlQQ|
args:
name: message
table: profiles
definition:
hasura_fields:
- id
- name
remote_schema: my-remote-schema
remote_field:
message:
arguments:
id: "$id"
|]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Utility functions.
--
-- NOTE(jkachmar): These are probably generally useful, and should be moved out
-- to some sort of test prelude.
-- | Fails the test if the 'Aeson.Result' is 'Aeson.Error', otherwise returns
-- the value in 'Aeson.Success'.
evalAesonResult ::
forall m a.
(MonadTest m, HasCallStack) =>
Aeson.Result a ->
m a
evalAesonResult x = evalEither $ case x of
Aeson.Success val -> Right val
Aeson.Error err -> Left err
-- | Test that the 'Aeson.toJSON' / 'Aeson.fromJSON' and 'Aeson.encode' /
-- 'Aeson.decode' functions are compatible with one another (respectively).
--
-- This is principally useful for validating manually implemented 'toEncoding'
-- methods (typically used to improve serialization performance).
trippingJSON ::
forall a m.
(FromJSON a, ToJSON a, Eq a, Show a, MonadTest m) =>
a ->
m ()
trippingJSON x = do
trippingJSONValue x
trippingJSONEncoding x
-- | Test that 'Aeson.toJSON' / 'Aeson.fromJSON' functions are compatible for a
-- given value.
--
-- This verifies that the 'parseJSON' and 'toJSON' instances agree with one
-- another.
trippingJSONValue ::
forall a m.
(FromJSON a, ToJSON a, Eq a, Show a, MonadTest m) =>
a ->
m ()
trippingJSONValue x = tripping x Aeson.toJSON Aeson.fromJSON
-- | Test that 'Aeson.encode' / 'Aeson.decode' functions are compatible for a
-- given value.
--
-- This verifies that the 'parseJSON' and 'toEncoding' instances agree with one
-- another.
trippingJSONEncoding ::
forall a m.
(FromJSON a, ToJSON a, Eq a, Show a, MonadTest m) =>
a ->
m ()
trippingJSONEncoding x = tripping x Aeson.encode Aeson.eitherDecode'
-- | Test that a specific JSON value can be parsed successfully.
decodesJSON :: forall a. (HasCallStack, FromJSON a) => Aeson.Value -> IO ()
decodesJSON value = case Aeson.fromJSON @a value of
Aeson.Success _ -> pure ()
Aeson.Error err -> expectationFailure err
-- | Test that a specific JSON value fails to parse.
rejectsJSON :: forall a. (HasCallStack, Typeable a, FromJSON a) => String -> Aeson.Value -> IO ()
rejectsJSON message value = case Aeson.fromJSON @a value of
Aeson.Error err -> err `shouldContain` message
Aeson.Success _ ->
expectationFailure $
mconcat
[ "expected parsing ",
show $ typeRep $ Proxy @a,
" to fail, but it succeeded"
]