graphql-engine/server/src-lib/Hasura/GraphQL/Schema/RemoteRelationship.hs

203 lines
9.7 KiB
Haskell
Raw Normal View History

module Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.RemoteRelationship
( remoteRelationshipField,
)
where
import Control.Lens
import Data.Has
import Data.HashMap.Strict.Extended qualified as Map
import Data.List.NonEmpty qualified as NE
import Data.Text.Extended
import Hasura.Base.Error
import Hasura.GraphQL.Execute.Types qualified as ET
import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser
import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser qualified as P
import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Internal.Parser qualified as P
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Backend
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Common
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Instances ()
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Remote
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Select
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Table
import Hasura.Prelude
import Hasura.RQL.DDL.RemoteRelationship.Validate
import Hasura.RQL.IR qualified as IR
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Common (FieldName, RelType (..), relNameToTxt)
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Relationships.Remote
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Relationships.ToSchema
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Relationships.ToSchema qualified as Remote
import Hasura.RQL.Types.RemoteSchema
import Hasura.RQL.Types.ResultCustomization
import Hasura.RQL.Types.SchemaCache
import Hasura.RQL.Types.SourceCustomization (mkCustomizedTypename)
import Hasura.SQL.AnyBackend
import Hasura.Session
import Language.GraphQL.Draft.Syntax qualified as G
-- | Remote relationship field parsers
remoteRelationshipField ::
forall r m n lhsJoinField.
(MonadBuildSchemaBase r m n) =>
RemoteFieldInfo lhsJoinField ->
m (Maybe [FieldParser n (IR.RemoteRelationshipField UnpreparedValue)])
remoteRelationshipField RemoteFieldInfo {..} = runMaybeT do
queryType <- asks $ qcQueryType . getter
-- https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/5144
-- The above issue is easily fixable by removing the following guard
guard $ queryType == ET.QueryHasura
case _rfiRHS of
RFISource anyRemoteSourceFieldInfo ->
dispatchAnyBackend @BackendSchema anyRemoteSourceFieldInfo \remoteSourceFieldInfo -> do
fields <- lift $ remoteRelationshipToSourceField remoteSourceFieldInfo
pure $ fmap (IR.RemoteSourceField . mkAnyBackend) <$> fields
RFISchema remoteSchema -> do
fields <- MaybeT $ remoteRelationshipToSchemaField _rfiLHS remoteSchema
pure $ pure $ IR.RemoteSchemaField <$> fields
-- | Parser(s) for remote relationship fields to a remote schema
remoteRelationshipToSchemaField ::
forall r m n lhsJoinField.
(MonadBuildSchemaBase r m n) =>
Map.HashMap FieldName lhsJoinField ->
RemoteSchemaFieldInfo ->
Enable remote joins from remote schemas in the execution engine. ### Description This PR adds the ability to perform remote joins from remote schemas in the engine. To do so, we alter the definition of an `ExecutionStep` targeting a remote schema: the `ExecStepRemote` constructor now expects a `Maybe RemoteJoins`. This new argument is used when processing the execution step, in the transport layer (either `Transport.HTTP` or `Transport.WebSocket`). For this `Maybe RemoteJoins` to be extracted from a parsed query, this PR also extends the `Execute.RemoteJoin.Collect` module, to implement "collection" from a selection set. Not only do those new functions extract the remote joins, but they also apply all necessary transformations to the selection sets (such as inserting the necessary "phantom" fields used as join keys). Finally in `Execute.RemoteJoin.Join`, we make two changes. First, we now always look for nested remote joins, regardless of whether the join we just performed went to a source or a remote schema; and second we adapt our join tree logic according to the special cases that were added to deal with remote server edge cases. Additionally, this PR refactors / cleans / documents `Execute.RemoteJoin.RemoteServer`. This is not required as part of this change and could be moved to a separate PR if needed (a similar cleanup of `Join` is done independently in #3894). It also introduces a draft of a new documentation page for this project, that will be refined in the release PR that ships the feature (either #3069 or a copy of it). While this PR extends the engine, it doesn't plug such relationships in the schema, meaning that, as of this PR, the new code paths in `Join` are technically unreachable. Adding the corresponding schema code and, ultimately, enabling the metadata API will be done in subsequent PRs. ### Keeping track of concrete type names The main change this PR makes to the existing `Join` code is to handle a new reserved field we sometimes use when targeting remote servers: the `__hasura_internal_typename` field. In short, a GraphQL selection set can sometimes "branch" based on the concrete "runtime type" of the object on which the selection happens: ```graphql query { author(id: 53478) { ... on Writer { name articles { title } } ... on Artist { name articles { title } } } } ``` If both of those `articles` are remote joins, we need to be able, when we get the answer, to differentiate between the two different cases. We do this by asking for `__typename`, to be able to decide if we're in the `Writer` or the `Artist` branch of the query. To avoid further processing / customization of results, we only insert this `__hasura_internal_typename: __typename` field in the query in the case of unions of interfaces AND if we have the guarantee that we will processing the request as part of the remote joins "folding": that is, if there's any remote join in this branch in the tree. Otherwise, we don't insert the field, and we leave that part of the response untouched. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3810 GitOrigin-RevId: 89aaf16274d68e26ad3730b80c2d2fdc2896b96c
2022-03-09 06:17:28 +03:00
m (Maybe (FieldParser n (IR.RemoteSchemaSelect (IR.RemoteRelationshipField UnpreparedValue))))
remoteRelationshipToSchemaField lhsFields RemoteSchemaFieldInfo {..} = runMaybeT do
remoteRelationshipQueryCtx <- asks $ qcRemoteRelationshipContext . getter
RemoteRelationshipQueryContext roleIntrospectionResultOriginal _ remoteSchemaCustomizer <-
-- The remote relationship field should not be accessible
-- if the remote schema is not accessible to the said role
hoistMaybe $ Map.lookup _rrfiRemoteSchemaName remoteRelationshipQueryCtx
role <- askRoleName
let hasuraFieldNames = Map.keysSet lhsFields
relationshipDef = ToSchemaRelationshipDef _rrfiRemoteSchemaName hasuraFieldNames _rrfiRemoteFields
(newInpValDefns :: [G.TypeDefinition [G.Name] RemoteSchemaInputValueDefinition], remoteFieldParamMap) <-
if role == adminRoleName
then do
-- we don't validate the remote relationship when the role is admin
-- because it's already been validated, when the remote relationship
-- was created
pure (_rrfiInputValueDefinitions, _rrfiParamMap)
else do
(_, roleRemoteField) <-
afold @(Either _) $
-- TODO: this really needs to go way, we shouldn't be doing
-- validation when building parsers
validateToSchemaRelationship relationshipDef _rrfiLHSIdentifier _rrfiName (_rrfiRemoteSchema, roleIntrospectionResultOriginal) lhsFields
pure (Remote._rrfiInputValueDefinitions roleRemoteField, Remote._rrfiParamMap roleRemoteField)
let roleIntrospection@(RemoteSchemaIntrospection typeDefns) = irDoc roleIntrospectionResultOriginal
-- add the new input value definitions created by the remote relationship
-- to the existing schema introspection of the role
remoteRelationshipIntrospection = RemoteSchemaIntrospection $ typeDefns <> Map.fromListOn getTypeName newInpValDefns
fieldName <- textToName $ relNameToTxt _rrfiName
-- This selection set parser, should be of the remote node's selection set parser, which comes
-- from the fieldCall
let fieldCalls = unRemoteFields _rrfiRemoteFields
parentTypeName = irQueryRoot roleIntrospectionResultOriginal
nestedFieldType <- lift $ lookupNestedFieldType parentTypeName roleIntrospection fieldCalls
let typeName = G.getBaseType nestedFieldType
fieldTypeDefinition <-
onNothing (lookupType roleIntrospection typeName)
-- the below case will never happen because we get the type name
-- from the schema document itself i.e. if a field exists for the
-- given role, then it's return type also must exist
$
throw500 $ "unexpected: " <> typeName <<> " not found "
-- These are the arguments that are given by the user while executing a query
let remoteFieldUserArguments = map snd $ Map.toList remoteFieldParamMap
remoteFld <-
withRemoteSchemaCustomization remoteSchemaCustomizer $
lift $
P.wrapFieldParser nestedFieldType
<$> remoteField remoteRelationshipIntrospection parentTypeName fieldName Nothing remoteFieldUserArguments fieldTypeDefinition
pure $
remoteFld
`P.bindField` \fld@IR.GraphQLField {IR._fArguments = args, IR._fSelectionSet = selSet, IR._fName = fname} -> do
let remoteArgs =
Map.toList args <&> \(argName, argVal) -> IR.RemoteFieldArgument argName $ P.GraphQLValue argVal
let resultCustomizer =
applyFieldCalls fieldCalls $
applyAliasMapping (singletonAliasMapping fname (fcName $ NE.last fieldCalls)) $
makeResultCustomizer remoteSchemaCustomizer fld
pure $
IR.RemoteSchemaSelect
{ IR._rselArgs = remoteArgs,
IR._rselResultCustomizer = resultCustomizer,
IR._rselSelection = selSet,
IR._rselFieldCall = fieldCalls,
IR._rselRemoteSchema = _rrfiRemoteSchema
}
where
-- Apply parent field calls so that the result customizer modifies the nested field
applyFieldCalls :: NonEmpty FieldCall -> ResultCustomizer -> ResultCustomizer
applyFieldCalls fieldCalls resultCustomizer =
foldr (modifyFieldByName . fcName) resultCustomizer $ NE.init fieldCalls
lookupNestedFieldType' ::
(MonadSchema n m, MonadError QErr m) =>
G.Name ->
RemoteSchemaIntrospection ->
FieldCall ->
m G.GType
lookupNestedFieldType' parentTypeName remoteSchemaIntrospection (FieldCall fcName _) =
case lookupObject remoteSchemaIntrospection parentTypeName of
Nothing -> throw400 RemoteSchemaError $ "object with name " <> parentTypeName <<> " not found"
Just G.ObjectTypeDefinition {..} ->
case find ((== fcName) . G._fldName) _otdFieldsDefinition of
Nothing -> throw400 RemoteSchemaError $ "field with name " <> fcName <<> " not found"
Just G.FieldDefinition {..} -> pure _fldType
lookupNestedFieldType ::
(MonadSchema n m, MonadError QErr m) =>
G.Name ->
RemoteSchemaIntrospection ->
NonEmpty FieldCall ->
m G.GType
lookupNestedFieldType parentTypeName remoteSchemaIntrospection (fieldCall :| rest) = do
fieldType <- lookupNestedFieldType' parentTypeName remoteSchemaIntrospection fieldCall
case NE.nonEmpty rest of
Nothing -> pure fieldType
Just rest' -> do
lookupNestedFieldType (G.getBaseType fieldType) remoteSchemaIntrospection rest'
-- | Parser(s) for remote relationship fields to a database table.
-- Note that when the target is a database table, an array relationship
-- declaration would have the '_aggregate' field in addition to the array
-- relationship field, hence [FieldParser ...] instead of 'FieldParser'
remoteRelationshipToSourceField ::
forall r m n tgt.
(MonadBuildSchemaBase r m n, BackendSchema tgt) =>
RemoteSourceFieldInfo tgt ->
m [FieldParser n (IR.RemoteSourceSelect (IR.RemoteRelationshipField UnpreparedValue) UnpreparedValue tgt)]
remoteRelationshipToSourceField RemoteSourceFieldInfo {..} =
withTypenameCustomization (mkCustomizedTypename $ Just _rsfiSourceCustomization) do
tableInfo <- askTableInfo @tgt _rsfiSource _rsfiTable
fieldName <- textToName $ relNameToTxt _rsfiName
maybePerms <- tableSelectPermissions @tgt tableInfo
case maybePerms of
Nothing -> pure []
Just tablePerms -> do
parsers <- case _rsfiType of
ObjRel -> do
Role-invariant schema constructors We build the GraphQL schema by combining building blocks such as `tableSelectionSet` and `columnParser`. These building blocks individually build `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects. Those object specify the valid GraphQL schema. Since the GraphQL schema is role-dependent, at some point we need to know what fragment of the GraphQL schema a specific role is allowed to access, and this is stored in `{Sel,Upd,Ins,Del}PermInfo` objects. We have passed around these permission objects as function arguments to the schema building blocks since we first started dealing with permissions during the PDV refactor - see hasura/graphql-engine@5168b99e463199b1934d8645bd6cd37eddb64ae1 in hasura/graphql-engine#4111. This means that, for instance, `tableSelectionSet` has as its type: ```haskell tableSelectionSet :: forall b r m n. MonadBuildSchema b r m n => SourceName -> TableInfo b -> SelPermInfo b -> m (Parser 'Output n (AnnotatedFields b)) ``` There are three reasons to change this. 1. We often pass a `Maybe (xPermInfo b)` instead of a proper `xPermInfo b`, and it's not clear what the intended semantics of this is. Some potential improvements on the data types involved are discussed in issue hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3125. 2. In most cases we also already pass a `TableInfo b`, and together with the `MonadRole` that is usually also in scope, this means that we could look up the required permissions regardless: so passing the permissions explicitly undermines the "single source of truth" principle. Breaking this principle also makes the code more difficult to read. 3. We are working towards role-based parsers (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2711), where the `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects are constructed in a role-invariant way, so that we have a single object that can be used for all roles. In particular, this means that the schema building blocks _need_ to be constructed in a role-invariant way. While this PR doesn't accomplish that, it does reduce the amount of role-specific arguments being passed, thus fixing hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3068. Concretely, this PR simply drops the `xPermInfo b` argument from almost all schema building blocks. Instead these objects are looked up from the `TableInfo b` as-needed. The resulting code is considerably simpler and shorter. One way to interpret this change is as follows. Before this PR, we figured out permissions at the top-level in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, passing down the obtained `xPermInfo` objects as required. After this PR, we have a bottom-up approach where the schema building blocks themselves decide whether they want to be included for a particular role. So this moves some permission logic out of `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, which is very complex. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3608 GitOrigin-RevId: 51a744f34ec7d57bc8077667ae7f9cb9c4f6c962
2022-02-17 11:16:20 +03:00
selectionSetParserM <- tableSelectionSet _rsfiSource tableInfo
pure $ case selectionSetParserM of
Nothing -> []
Just selectionSetParser ->
pure $
subselection_ fieldName Nothing selectionSetParser <&> \fields ->
IR.SourceRelationshipObject $
IR.AnnObjectSelectG fields _rsfiTable $ IR._tpFilter $ tablePermissionsInfo tablePerms
ArrRel -> do
let aggFieldName = fieldName <> $$(G.litName "_aggregate")
Role-invariant schema constructors We build the GraphQL schema by combining building blocks such as `tableSelectionSet` and `columnParser`. These building blocks individually build `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects. Those object specify the valid GraphQL schema. Since the GraphQL schema is role-dependent, at some point we need to know what fragment of the GraphQL schema a specific role is allowed to access, and this is stored in `{Sel,Upd,Ins,Del}PermInfo` objects. We have passed around these permission objects as function arguments to the schema building blocks since we first started dealing with permissions during the PDV refactor - see hasura/graphql-engine@5168b99e463199b1934d8645bd6cd37eddb64ae1 in hasura/graphql-engine#4111. This means that, for instance, `tableSelectionSet` has as its type: ```haskell tableSelectionSet :: forall b r m n. MonadBuildSchema b r m n => SourceName -> TableInfo b -> SelPermInfo b -> m (Parser 'Output n (AnnotatedFields b)) ``` There are three reasons to change this. 1. We often pass a `Maybe (xPermInfo b)` instead of a proper `xPermInfo b`, and it's not clear what the intended semantics of this is. Some potential improvements on the data types involved are discussed in issue hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3125. 2. In most cases we also already pass a `TableInfo b`, and together with the `MonadRole` that is usually also in scope, this means that we could look up the required permissions regardless: so passing the permissions explicitly undermines the "single source of truth" principle. Breaking this principle also makes the code more difficult to read. 3. We are working towards role-based parsers (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2711), where the `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects are constructed in a role-invariant way, so that we have a single object that can be used for all roles. In particular, this means that the schema building blocks _need_ to be constructed in a role-invariant way. While this PR doesn't accomplish that, it does reduce the amount of role-specific arguments being passed, thus fixing hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3068. Concretely, this PR simply drops the `xPermInfo b` argument from almost all schema building blocks. Instead these objects are looked up from the `TableInfo b` as-needed. The resulting code is considerably simpler and shorter. One way to interpret this change is as follows. Before this PR, we figured out permissions at the top-level in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, passing down the obtained `xPermInfo` objects as required. After this PR, we have a bottom-up approach where the schema building blocks themselves decide whether they want to be included for a particular role. So this moves some permission logic out of `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, which is very complex. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3608 GitOrigin-RevId: 51a744f34ec7d57bc8077667ae7f9cb9c4f6c962
2022-02-17 11:16:20 +03:00
selectionSetParser <- selectTable _rsfiSource tableInfo fieldName Nothing
aggSelectionSetParser <- selectTableAggregate _rsfiSource tableInfo aggFieldName Nothing
pure $
catMaybes
Role-invariant schema constructors We build the GraphQL schema by combining building blocks such as `tableSelectionSet` and `columnParser`. These building blocks individually build `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects. Those object specify the valid GraphQL schema. Since the GraphQL schema is role-dependent, at some point we need to know what fragment of the GraphQL schema a specific role is allowed to access, and this is stored in `{Sel,Upd,Ins,Del}PermInfo` objects. We have passed around these permission objects as function arguments to the schema building blocks since we first started dealing with permissions during the PDV refactor - see hasura/graphql-engine@5168b99e463199b1934d8645bd6cd37eddb64ae1 in hasura/graphql-engine#4111. This means that, for instance, `tableSelectionSet` has as its type: ```haskell tableSelectionSet :: forall b r m n. MonadBuildSchema b r m n => SourceName -> TableInfo b -> SelPermInfo b -> m (Parser 'Output n (AnnotatedFields b)) ``` There are three reasons to change this. 1. We often pass a `Maybe (xPermInfo b)` instead of a proper `xPermInfo b`, and it's not clear what the intended semantics of this is. Some potential improvements on the data types involved are discussed in issue hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3125. 2. In most cases we also already pass a `TableInfo b`, and together with the `MonadRole` that is usually also in scope, this means that we could look up the required permissions regardless: so passing the permissions explicitly undermines the "single source of truth" principle. Breaking this principle also makes the code more difficult to read. 3. We are working towards role-based parsers (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2711), where the `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects are constructed in a role-invariant way, so that we have a single object that can be used for all roles. In particular, this means that the schema building blocks _need_ to be constructed in a role-invariant way. While this PR doesn't accomplish that, it does reduce the amount of role-specific arguments being passed, thus fixing hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3068. Concretely, this PR simply drops the `xPermInfo b` argument from almost all schema building blocks. Instead these objects are looked up from the `TableInfo b` as-needed. The resulting code is considerably simpler and shorter. One way to interpret this change is as follows. Before this PR, we figured out permissions at the top-level in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, passing down the obtained `xPermInfo` objects as required. After this PR, we have a bottom-up approach where the schema building blocks themselves decide whether they want to be included for a particular role. So this moves some permission logic out of `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, which is very complex. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3608 GitOrigin-RevId: 51a744f34ec7d57bc8077667ae7f9cb9c4f6c962
2022-02-17 11:16:20 +03:00
[ selectionSetParser <&> fmap IR.SourceRelationshipArray,
aggSelectionSetParser <&> fmap IR.SourceRelationshipArrayAggregate
]
pure $
parsers <&> fmap \select ->
IR.RemoteSourceSelect _rsfiSource _rsfiSourceConfig select _rsfiMapping