graphql-engine/server/src-lib/Hasura/Backends/Postgres/Schema/OnConflict.hs

169 lines
7.5 KiB
Haskell
Raw Normal View History

{-# LANGUAGE ApplicativeDo #-}
{-# LANGUAGE PatternGuards #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TemplateHaskellQuotes #-}
-- | Postgres Schema OnConflict
--
-- This module contains the building blocks for parsing @on_conflict@ clauses,
-- which in the Postgres backend are used to implement upsert functionality.
-- These are used by 'Hasura.Backends.Postgres.Instances.Schema.backendInsertParser' to
-- construct a postgres-specific schema parser for insert (and upsert) mutations.
module Hasura.Backends.Postgres.Schema.OnConflict
( onConflictFieldParser,
)
where
import Data.Has (getter)
import Data.HashMap.Strict qualified as HM
import Data.HashSet qualified as HS
import Data.Text.Extended
import Hasura.Backends.Postgres.SQL.Types (showPGCols)
import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Class
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Backend
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.BoolExp
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Common
server: Metadata origin for definitions (type parameter version v2) The code that builds the GraphQL schema, and `buildGQLContext` in particular, is partial: not every value of `(ServerConfigCtx, GraphQLQueryType, SourceCache, HashMap RemoteSchemaName (RemoteSchemaCtx, MetadataObject), ActionCache, AnnotatedCustomTypes)` results in a valid GraphQL schema. When it fails, we want to be able to return better error messages than we currently do. The key thing that is missing is a way to trace back GraphQL type information to their origin from the Hasura metadata. Currently, we have a number of correctness checks of our GraphQL schema. But these correctness checks only have access to pure GraphQL type information, and hence can only report errors in terms of that. Possibly the worst is the "conflicting definitions" error, which, in practice, can only be debugged by Hasura engineers. This is terrible DX for customers. This PR allows us to print better error messages, by adding a field to the `Definition` type that traces the GraphQL type to its origin in the metadata. So the idea is simple: just add `MetadataObjId`, or `Maybe` that, or some other sum type of that, to `Definition`. However, we want to avoid having to import a `Hasura.RQL` module from `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser`. So we instead define this additional field of `Definition` through a new type parameter, which is threaded through in `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser`. We then define type synonyms in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser` that fill in this type parameter, so that it is not visible for the majority of the codebase. The idea of associating metadata information to `Definition`s really comes to fruition when combined with hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4517. Their combination would allow us to use the API of fatal errors (just like the current `MonadError QErr`) to report _inconsistencies_ in the metadata. Such inconsistencies are then _automatically_ ignored. So no ad-hoc decisions need to be made on how to cut out inconsistent metadata from the GraphQL schema. This will allow us to report much better errors, as well as improve the likelihood of a successful HGE startup. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4770 Co-authored-by: Samir Talwar <47582+SamirTalwar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 728402b0cae83ae8e83463a826ceeb609001acae
2022-06-28 18:52:26 +03:00
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser
( InputFieldsParser,
Kind (..),
Parser,
)
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser qualified as P
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Table
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Typename
import Hasura.Name qualified as Name
import Hasura.Prelude
import Hasura.RQL.IR.BoolExp qualified as IR
import Hasura.RQL.IR.Insert qualified as IR
import Hasura.RQL.IR.Value qualified as IR
import Hasura.RQL.Types.SchemaCache
2022-05-27 20:21:22 +03:00
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Source
import Hasura.RQL.Types.SourceCustomization
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Table
import Hasura.SQL.Backend
import Language.GraphQL.Draft.Syntax qualified as G
-- | Parser for a field name @on_conflict@ of type @tablename_on_conflict@.
--
-- The @tablename_on_conflict@ object is used to generate the @ON CONFLICT@
-- SQL clause, indicating what should be done if an insert raises a conflict.
--
-- The types ordinarily produced by this parser are only created if the table has
-- unique or primary keys constraints.
--
-- If there are no columns for which the current role has update permissions, we
-- must still accept an empty list for @update_columns@ to support the "ON
-- CONFLICT DO NOTHING" case. We do this by adding a placeholder value to the
-- enum. See <https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/6804>.
onConflictFieldParser ::
forall pgKind r m n.
( MonadBuildSchema ('Postgres pgKind) r m n,
AggregationPredicatesSchema ('Postgres pgKind)
) =>
TableInfo ('Postgres pgKind) ->
SchemaT r m (InputFieldsParser n (Maybe (IR.OnConflictClause ('Postgres pgKind) (IR.UnpreparedValue ('Postgres pgKind)))))
onConflictFieldParser tableInfo = do
sourceInfo :: SourceInfo ('Postgres pgKind) <- asks getter
Move RoleName into SchemaContext. ### Description I am not 100% sure about this PR; while I think the code is better this way, I'm willing to be convinced otherwise. In short, this PR moves the `RoleName` field into the `SchemaContext`, instead of being a nebulous `Has RoleName` constraint on the reader monad. The major upside of this is that it makes it an explicit named field, rather than something that must be given as part of a tuple of arguments when calling `runReader`. However, the downside is that it breaks the helper permissions functions of `Schema.Table`, which relied on `Has RoleName r`. This PR makes the choice of passing the role name explicitly to all of those functions, which in turn means first explicitly fetching the role name in a lot of places. It makes it more explicit when a schema building block relies on the role name, but is a bit verbose... ### Alternatives Some alternatives worth considering: - attempting something like `Has context r, Has RoleName context`, which would allow them to be independent from the context but still fetch the role name from the reader, but might require type annotations to not be ambiguous - keeping the permission functions the same, with `Has RoleName r`, and introducing a bunch of newtypes instead of using tuples to explicitly implement all the required `Has` instances - changing the permission functions to `Has SchemaContext r`, since they are functions used only to build the schema, and therefore may be allowed to be tied to the context. What do y'all think? PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/5073 GitOrigin-RevId: 8fd09fafb54905a4d115ef30842d35da0c3db5d2
2022-07-29 18:37:09 +03:00
roleName <- retrieve scRole
let customization = _siCustomization sourceInfo
tCase = _rscNamingConvention customization
permissions = getRolePermInfo roleName tableInfo
Move RoleName into SchemaContext. ### Description I am not 100% sure about this PR; while I think the code is better this way, I'm willing to be convinced otherwise. In short, this PR moves the `RoleName` field into the `SchemaContext`, instead of being a nebulous `Has RoleName` constraint on the reader monad. The major upside of this is that it makes it an explicit named field, rather than something that must be given as part of a tuple of arguments when calling `runReader`. However, the downside is that it breaks the helper permissions functions of `Schema.Table`, which relied on `Has RoleName r`. This PR makes the choice of passing the role name explicitly to all of those functions, which in turn means first explicitly fetching the role name in a lot of places. It makes it more explicit when a schema building block relies on the role name, but is a bit verbose... ### Alternatives Some alternatives worth considering: - attempting something like `Has context r, Has RoleName context`, which would allow them to be independent from the context but still fetch the role name from the reader, but might require type annotations to not be ambiguous - keeping the permission functions the same, with `Has RoleName r`, and introducing a bunch of newtypes instead of using tuples to explicitly implement all the required `Has` instances - changing the permission functions to `Has SchemaContext r`, since they are functions used only to build the schema, and therefore may be allowed to be tied to the context. What do y'all think? PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/5073 GitOrigin-RevId: 8fd09fafb54905a4d115ef30842d35da0c3db5d2
2022-07-29 18:37:09 +03:00
maybeConstraints = tciUniqueOrPrimaryKeyConstraints . _tiCoreInfo $ tableInfo
maybeConflictObject = conflictObjectParser tableInfo (_permUpd permissions) <$> maybeConstraints
case maybeConflictObject of
Just conflictObject -> conflictObject <&> P.fieldOptional (applyFieldNameCaseCust tCase Name._on_conflict) (Just "upsert condition")
Nothing -> return $ pure Nothing
-- | Create a parser for the @_on_conflict@ object of the given table.
conflictObjectParser ::
forall pgKind r m n.
( MonadBuildSchema ('Postgres pgKind) r m n,
AggregationPredicatesSchema ('Postgres pgKind)
) =>
TableInfo ('Postgres pgKind) ->
Maybe (UpdPermInfo ('Postgres pgKind)) ->
NonEmpty (UniqueConstraint ('Postgres pgKind)) ->
SchemaT r m (Parser 'Input n (IR.OnConflictClause ('Postgres pgKind) (IR.UnpreparedValue ('Postgres pgKind))))
conflictObjectParser tableInfo maybeUpdatePerms constraints = do
sourceInfo :: SourceInfo ('Postgres pgKind) <- asks getter
let tableName = tableInfoName tableInfo
customization = _siCustomization sourceInfo
tCase = _rscNamingConvention customization
mkTypename = runMkTypename $ _rscTypeNames customization
Role-invariant schema constructors We build the GraphQL schema by combining building blocks such as `tableSelectionSet` and `columnParser`. These building blocks individually build `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects. Those object specify the valid GraphQL schema. Since the GraphQL schema is role-dependent, at some point we need to know what fragment of the GraphQL schema a specific role is allowed to access, and this is stored in `{Sel,Upd,Ins,Del}PermInfo` objects. We have passed around these permission objects as function arguments to the schema building blocks since we first started dealing with permissions during the PDV refactor - see hasura/graphql-engine@5168b99e463199b1934d8645bd6cd37eddb64ae1 in hasura/graphql-engine#4111. This means that, for instance, `tableSelectionSet` has as its type: ```haskell tableSelectionSet :: forall b r m n. MonadBuildSchema b r m n => SourceName -> TableInfo b -> SelPermInfo b -> m (Parser 'Output n (AnnotatedFields b)) ``` There are three reasons to change this. 1. We often pass a `Maybe (xPermInfo b)` instead of a proper `xPermInfo b`, and it's not clear what the intended semantics of this is. Some potential improvements on the data types involved are discussed in issue hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3125. 2. In most cases we also already pass a `TableInfo b`, and together with the `MonadRole` that is usually also in scope, this means that we could look up the required permissions regardless: so passing the permissions explicitly undermines the "single source of truth" principle. Breaking this principle also makes the code more difficult to read. 3. We are working towards role-based parsers (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2711), where the `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects are constructed in a role-invariant way, so that we have a single object that can be used for all roles. In particular, this means that the schema building blocks _need_ to be constructed in a role-invariant way. While this PR doesn't accomplish that, it does reduce the amount of role-specific arguments being passed, thus fixing hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3068. Concretely, this PR simply drops the `xPermInfo b` argument from almost all schema building blocks. Instead these objects are looked up from the `TableInfo b` as-needed. The resulting code is considerably simpler and shorter. One way to interpret this change is as follows. Before this PR, we figured out permissions at the top-level in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, passing down the obtained `xPermInfo` objects as required. After this PR, we have a bottom-up approach where the schema building blocks themselves decide whether they want to be included for a particular role. So this moves some permission logic out of `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, which is very complex. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3608 GitOrigin-RevId: 51a744f34ec7d57bc8077667ae7f9cb9c4f6c962
2022-02-17 11:16:20 +03:00
updateColumnsEnum <- updateColumnsPlaceholderParser tableInfo
constraintParser <- conflictConstraint constraints tableInfo
whereExpParser <- tableBoolExp tableInfo
tableGQLName <- getTableIdentifierName tableInfo
let objectName = mkTypename $ applyTypeNameCaseIdentifier tCase $ mkOnConflictTypeName tableGQLName
objectDesc = G.Description $ "on_conflict condition type for table " <>> tableName
(presetColumns, updateFilter) = fromMaybe (HM.empty, IR.gBoolExpTrue) $ do
UpdPermInfo {..} <- maybeUpdatePerms
pure
( partialSQLExpToUnpreparedValue <$> upiSet,
fmap partialSQLExpToUnpreparedValue <$> upiFilter
)
pure $
P.object objectName (Just objectDesc) do
constraintField <- P.field Name._constraint Nothing constraintParser
let updateColumnsField = P.fieldWithDefault (applyFieldNameCaseIdentifier tCase updateColumnsFieldName) Nothing (G.VList []) (P.list updateColumnsEnum)
whereExp <- P.fieldOptional Name._where Nothing whereExpParser
updateColumns <-
updateColumnsField `P.bindFields` \updateColumnsMaybe ->
onNothing
(sequenceA @[] @Maybe updateColumnsMaybe)
-- this can only happen if the placeholder was used
(parseError "erroneous column name")
pure $
let UniqueConstraint (Constraint {_cName}) _ = constraintField
constraintTarget = IR.CTConstraint _cName
in case updateColumns of
[] -> IR.OCCDoNothing $ Just constraintTarget
_ ->
IR.OCCUpdate $
IR.OnConflictClauseData constraintTarget updateColumns presetColumns $
IR.BoolAnd $
updateFilter : maybeToList whereExp
-- | Constructs a Parser for the name of the constraints on a given table.
--
-- The TableCoreInfo of a given table contains a list of unique or primary key
-- constraints. Given the list of such constraints, this function creates a
-- parser for an enum type that matches it. This function makes no attempt at
-- de-duplicating contraint names, and assumes they are correct.
--
-- This function can fail if a constraint has a name that cannot be translated
-- to a GraphQL name (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#1748).
conflictConstraint ::
forall pgKind r m n.
MonadBuildSchema ('Postgres pgKind) r m n =>
NonEmpty (UniqueConstraint ('Postgres pgKind)) ->
TableInfo ('Postgres pgKind) ->
SchemaT r m (Parser 'Both n (UniqueConstraint ('Postgres pgKind)))
conflictConstraint constraints tableInfo = do
sourceInfo :: SourceInfo ('Postgres pgKind) <- asks getter
let sourceName = _siName sourceInfo
tableName = tableInfoName tableInfo
customization = _siCustomization sourceInfo
tCase = _rscNamingConvention customization
mkTypename = runMkTypename $ _rscTypeNames customization
P.memoizeOn 'conflictConstraint (sourceName, tableName) $ do
tableGQLName <- getTableIdentifierName tableInfo
constraintEnumValues <- for
constraints
\c@(UniqueConstraint (Constraint {_cName}) cCols) -> do
name <- textToName $ toTxt $ _cName
pure
( P.Definition
name
(Just $ "unique or primary key constraint on columns " <> coerce (showPGCols (HS.toList cCols)))
server: Metadata origin for definitions (type parameter version v2) The code that builds the GraphQL schema, and `buildGQLContext` in particular, is partial: not every value of `(ServerConfigCtx, GraphQLQueryType, SourceCache, HashMap RemoteSchemaName (RemoteSchemaCtx, MetadataObject), ActionCache, AnnotatedCustomTypes)` results in a valid GraphQL schema. When it fails, we want to be able to return better error messages than we currently do. The key thing that is missing is a way to trace back GraphQL type information to their origin from the Hasura metadata. Currently, we have a number of correctness checks of our GraphQL schema. But these correctness checks only have access to pure GraphQL type information, and hence can only report errors in terms of that. Possibly the worst is the "conflicting definitions" error, which, in practice, can only be debugged by Hasura engineers. This is terrible DX for customers. This PR allows us to print better error messages, by adding a field to the `Definition` type that traces the GraphQL type to its origin in the metadata. So the idea is simple: just add `MetadataObjId`, or `Maybe` that, or some other sum type of that, to `Definition`. However, we want to avoid having to import a `Hasura.RQL` module from `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser`. So we instead define this additional field of `Definition` through a new type parameter, which is threaded through in `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser`. We then define type synonyms in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser` that fill in this type parameter, so that it is not visible for the majority of the codebase. The idea of associating metadata information to `Definition`s really comes to fruition when combined with hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4517. Their combination would allow us to use the API of fatal errors (just like the current `MonadError QErr`) to report _inconsistencies_ in the metadata. Such inconsistencies are then _automatically_ ignored. So no ad-hoc decisions need to be made on how to cut out inconsistent metadata from the GraphQL schema. This will allow us to report much better errors, as well as improve the likelihood of a successful HGE startup. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4770 Co-authored-by: Samir Talwar <47582+SamirTalwar@users.noreply.github.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 728402b0cae83ae8e83463a826ceeb609001acae
2022-06-28 18:52:26 +03:00
Nothing
[]
P.EnumValueInfo,
c
)
let enumName = mkTypename $ applyTypeNameCaseIdentifier tCase $ mkTableConstraintTypeName tableGQLName
enumDesc = G.Description $ "unique or primary key constraints on table " <>> tableName
pure $ P.enum enumName (Just enumDesc) constraintEnumValues