Upgrade to GHC 9.4.5, and update any tests.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/8954
Co-authored-by: Mohd Bilal <24944223+m-Bilal@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Samir Talwar <47582+SamirTalwar@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Philip Lykke Carlsen <358550+plcplc@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 5261126777cb478567ea471c4bf5441bc345ea0d
When upgrading to GHC v9.4, we noticed a number of failures because the sort order of HashMaps has changed. With this changeset, I am endeavoring to mitigate this now and in the future.
This makes one of two changes in a few areas where we depend on the sort order of elements in a `HashMap`:
1. the ordering of the request is preserved with `InsOrdHashMap`, or
2. we sort the data after retrieving it.
Fortunately, we do not do this anywhere where we _must_ preserve order; it's "just" descriptions, error messages, and OpenAPI metadata. The main problem is that tests are likely to fail each time we upgrade GHC (or whatever is providing the hash seed).
[NDAT-705]: https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/NDAT-705?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/9390
GitOrigin-RevId: 84503e029b44094edbbc298651744bc2843c15f3
## Description
This is the first step in making use of Logical Models with document databases such as MongoDB. As part of schema introspection, a data connector agent can supply a set of custom types that can be used to describe the schema for columns within the tables of the database (or _fields_ within a _document collection_ in MongoDB terminology).
Previously, we were storing these custom types as `TableObjectType`s within the `TableCoreInfo` for each table.
In this PR we
- replace the `TableObjectTypes` with `LogicalModel` types
- store these directly within the `DBObjectsIntrospection` instead of within the `TableCoreInfo` for each table. (The custom types are shared at the source level so there was no reason to have a separate set of types for each table.)
- When building the `SourceInfo`, we combine the `LogicalModel`s from `DBObjectsIntrospection` with `LogicalModel`s from the user's metadata to create the set of `LogicalModels` in the `SourceInfo` within the `SchemaCache`. I.e. we combine the set of types obtained by database introspection with the set of types specified by the user in the metadata. If two types have the same name, we use the type defined in the metadata.
## Limitations and future work
- Provide a way for the user to associate a meta-data defined `LogicalModel` with a table instead of requiring one to be provided by DB introspection
- Provide a way for the user to edit the `LogicalModel` types provided by introspection and add them to the metadata.
- Allow a `LogicalModel` object type to describe and entire table rather than just individual columns.
- Better handling for "unknown" types, e.g. if the type of a collection (or part of a collection) is unknown we should treat it as a JSON scalar value. This may also involve adding an `_everything` field which returns the full document as a JSON scalar.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/9345
GitOrigin-RevId: 5cec72fc1be1380d8600f7be547bbf71aad770bd
### Description
This monster of a PR took way too long. As the title suggests, it reduces the schema context carried in the readers to the very strict minimum. In practice, that means that to build a source, we only require:
- the global `SchemaContext`
- the global `SchemaOptions` (soon to be renamed `SchemaSourceOptions`)
- that source's `SourceInfo`
Furthermore, _we no longer carry "default" customization options throughout the schema_. All customization information is extracted from the `SourceInfo`, when required. This prevents an entire category of bugs we had previously encountered, such as parts of the code using uninitialized / unupdated customization info.
In turn, this meant that we could remove the explicit threading of the `SourceInfo` throughout the schema, since it is now always available through the reader context.
Finally, this meant making a few adjustments to relay and actions as well, such as the introduction of a new separate "context" for actions, and a change to how we create some of the action-specific postgres scalar parsers.
I'll highlight with review comments the areas of interest.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6709
GitOrigin-RevId: ea80fddcb24e2513779dd04b0b700a55f0028dd1
This upgrades the version of Ormolu required by the HGE repository to v0.5.0.1, and reformats all code accordingly.
Ormolu v0.5 reformats code that uses infix operators. This is mostly useful, adding newlines and indentation to make it clear which operators are applied first, but in some cases, it's unpleasant. To make this easier on the eyes, I had to do the following:
* Add a few fixity declarations (search for `infix`)
* Add parentheses to make precedence clear, allowing Ormolu to keep everything on one line
* Rename `relevantEq` to `(==~)` in #6651 and set it to `infix 4`
* Add a few _.ormolu_ files (thanks to @hallettj for helping me get started), mostly for Autodocodec operators that don't have explicit fixity declarations
In general, I think these changes are quite reasonable. They mostly affect indentation.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6675
GitOrigin-RevId: cd47d87f1d089fb0bc9dcbbe7798dbceedcd7d83
The main aim of the PR is:
1. To set up a module structure for 'remote-schemas' package.
2. Move parts by the remote schema codebase into the new module structure to validate it.
## Notes to the reviewer
Why a PR with large-ish diff?
1. We've been making progress on the MM project but we don't yet know long it is going to take us to get to the first milestone. To understand this better, we need to figure out the unknowns as soon as possible. Hence I've taken a stab at the first two items in the [end-state](https://gist.github.com/0x777/ca2bdc4284d21c3eec153b51dea255c9) document to figure out the unknowns. Unsurprisingly, there are a bunch of issues that we haven't discussed earlier. These are documented in the 'open questions' section.
1. The diff is large but that is only code moved around and I've added a section that documents how things are moved. In addition, there are fair number of PR comments to help with the review process.
## Changes in the PR
### Module structure
Sets up the module structure as follows:
```
Hasura/
RemoteSchema/
Metadata/
Types.hs
SchemaCache/
Types.hs
Permission.hs
RemoteRelationship.hs
Build.hs
MetadataAPI/
Types.hs
Execute.hs
```
### 1. Types representing metadata are moved
Types that capture metadata information (currently scattered across several RQL modules) are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types`.
- This new module only depends on very 'core' modules such as
`Hasura.Session` for the notion of roles and `Hasura.Incremental` for `Cacheable` typeclass.
- The requirement on database modules is avoided by generalizing the remote schemas metadata to accept an arbitrary 'r' for a remote relationship
definition.
### 2. SchemaCache related types and build logic have been moved
Types that represent remote schemas information in SchemaCache are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Types`.
Similar to `H.RS.Metadata.Types`, this module depends on 'core' modules except for `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Variable`. It has something to do with remote relationships but I haven't spent time looking into it. The validation of 'remote relationships to remote schema' is also something that needs to be looked at.
Rips out the logic that builds remote schema's SchemaCache information from the monolithic `buildSchemaCacheRule` and moves it into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Build`. Further, the `.SchemaCache.Permission` and `.SchemaCache.RemoteRelationship` have been created from existing modules that capture schema cache building logic for those two components.
This was a fair amount of work. On main, currently remote schema's SchemaCache information is built in two phases - in the first phase, 'permissions' and 'remote relationships' are ignored and in the second phase they are filled in.
While remote relationships can only be resolved after partially resolving sources and other remote schemas, the same isn't true for permissions. Further, most of the work that is done to resolve remote relationships can be moved to the first phase so that the second phase can be a very simple traversal.
This is the approach that was taken - resolve permissions and as much as remote relationships information in the first phase.
### 3. Metadata APIs related types and build logic have been moved
The types that represent remote schema related metadata APIs and the execution logic have been moved to `Hasura.RemoteSchema.MetadataAPI.Types` and `.Execute` modules respectively.
## Open questions:
1. `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types` is so called because I was hoping that all of the metadata related APIs of remote schema can be brought in at `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.API`. However, as metadata APIs depended on functions from `SchemaCache` module (see [1](ceba6d6226/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs (L55)) and [2](ceba6d6226/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs (L91)), it made more sense to create a separate top-level module for `MetadataAPI`s.
Maybe we can just have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata` and get rid of the extra nesting or have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.{Core,Permission,RemoteRelationship}` if we want to break them down further.
1. `buildRemoteSchemas` in `H.RS.SchemaCache.Build` has the following type:
```haskell
buildRemoteSchemas ::
( ArrowChoice arr,
Inc.ArrowDistribute arr,
ArrowWriter (Seq CollectedInfo) arr,
Inc.ArrowCache m arr,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
Inc.Cacheable remoteRelationshipDefinition,
ToJSON remoteRelationshipDefinition,
MonadError QErr m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
( (Inc.Dependency (HashMap RemoteSchemaName Inc.InvalidationKey), OrderedRoles),
[RemoteSchemaMetadataG remoteRelationshipDefinition]
)
`arr` HashMap RemoteSchemaName (PartiallyResolvedRemoteSchemaCtxG remoteRelationshipDefinition, MetadataObject)
```
Note the dependence on `CollectedInfo` which is defined as
```haskell
data CollectedInfo
= CIInconsistency InconsistentMetadata
| CIDependency
MetadataObject
-- ^ for error reporting on missing dependencies
SchemaObjId
SchemaDependency
deriving (Eq)
```
this pretty much means that remote schemas is dependent on types from databases, actions, ....
How do we fix this? Maybe introduce a typeclass such as `ArrowCollectRemoteSchemaDependencies` which is defined in `Hasura.RemoteSchema` and then implemented in graphql-engine?
1. The dependency on `buildSchemaCacheFor` in `.MetadataAPI.Execute` which has the following signature:
```haskell
buildSchemaCacheFor ::
(QErrM m, CacheRWM m, MetadataM m) =>
MetadataObjId ->
MetadataModifier ->
```
This can be easily resolved if we restrict what the metadata APIs are allowed to do. Currently, they operate in an unfettered access to modify SchemaCache (the `CacheRWM` constraint):
```haskell
runAddRemoteSchema ::
( QErrM m,
CacheRWM m,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
MetadataM m,
Tracing.MonadTrace m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
AddRemoteSchemaQuery ->
m EncJSON
```
This should instead be changed to restrict remote schema APIs to only modify remote schema metadata (but has access to the remote schemas part of the schema cache), this dependency is completely removed.
```haskell
runAddRemoteSchema ::
( QErrM m,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
MonadReader RemoteSchemasSchemaCache m,
MonadState RemoteSchemaMetadata m,
Tracing.MonadTrace m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
AddRemoteSchemaQuery ->
m RemoteSchemeMetadataObjId
```
The idea is that the core graphql-engine would call these functions and then call
`buildSchemaCacheFor`.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6291
GitOrigin-RevId: 51357148c6404afe70219afa71bd1d59bdf4ffc6
I didn't track why these were left behind. Presumably GHC 9.2 has an improved redundant constraint checker, so that explains a few. Otherwise, perhaps code got refactored along the way.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6256
GitOrigin-RevId: b6275edf3e867f8e33bdec533ce9932381d36bbb
### Description
This PR attempts to fix several issues with source customization as it relates to remote relationships. There were several issues regarding casing: at the relationship border, we didn't properly set the target source's case, we didn't have access to the list of supported features to decide whether the feature was allowed or not, and we didn't have access to the global default.
However, all of that information is available when we build the schema cache, as we do resolve the case of some elements such as function names: we can therefore resolve source information at the same time, and simplify both the root of the schema and the remote relationship border.
To do this, this PR introduces a new type, `ResolvedSourceCustomization`, to be used in the Schema Cache, as opposed to the metadata's `SourceCustomization`, following a pattern established by a lot of other types.
### Remaining work and open questions
One major point of confusion: it seems to me that we didn't set the case at all across remote relationships, which would suggest we would use the case of the LHS source across the subset of the RHS one that is accessible through the remote relationship, which would in turn "corrupt" the parser cache and might result in the wrong case being used for that source later on. Is that assesment correct, and was I right to fix it?
Another one is that we seem not to be using the local case of the RHS to name the field in an object relationship; unless I'm mistaken we only use it for array relationships? Is that intentional?
This PR is also missing tests that would show-case the difference, and a changelog entry. To my knowledge, all the tests of this feature are in the python test suite; this could be the opportunity to move them to the hspec suite, but this might be a considerable amount of work?
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/5619
GitOrigin-RevId: 51a81b713a74575e82d9f96b51633f158ce3a47b
### Description
This PR changes all the schema code to operate in a specific `SchemaT` monad, rather than in an arbitrary `m` monad. `SchemaT` is intended to be used opaquely with `runSourceSchema` and `runRemoteSchema`. The main goal of this is to allow a different reader context per part of the schema: this PR also minimizes the contexts. This means that we no longer require `SchemaOptions` when building remote schemas' schema, and this PR therefore removes a lot of dummy / placeholder values accordingly.
### Performance and stacking
This PR has been through several iterations. #5339 was the original version, that accomplished the same thing by stacking readers on top of the stack at every remote relationship boundary. This raised performance concerns, and @0x777 confirmed with an ad-hoc test that in some extreme cases we could see up to a 10% performance impact. This version, while more verbose, allows us to unstack / re-stack the readers, and avoid that problem. #5517 adds a new benchmark set to be able to automatically measure this on every PR.
### Remaining work
- [x] a comment (or perhaps even a Note?) should be added to `SchemaT`
- [x] we probably want for #5517 to be merged first so that we can confirm the lack of performance penalty
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/5458
GitOrigin-RevId: e06b83d90da475f745b838f1fd8f8b4d9d3f4b10
It's about time.
To do this I had to check a few more boxes.
* I copied the flags from `graphql-engine.cabal` to the libraries in `server/lib`.
* I moved `Cacheable` instances of schema parser types beside the typeclass declaration.
* I removed imports of `Hasura.Prelude` from the tests, and rewrote them accordingly.
* I copied the `TestMonad` parse monad into `server/src-test/Hasura/GraphQL/Schema/RemoteTest.hs`, which was using it. I think this could be done with the real thing, but I tried replacing it with constraints and it messed with my head somewhat.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/5311
GitOrigin-RevId: ebebcc50a16f2d517b7f730fe72410827ca3e86c
Followup to hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4713.
The `memoizeOn` method, part of `MonadSchema`, originally had the following type:
```haskell
memoizeOn
:: (HasCallStack, Ord a, Typeable a, Typeable b, Typeable k)
=> TH.Name
-> a
-> m (Parser k n b)
-> m (Parser k n b)
```
The reason for operating on `Parser`s specifically was that the `MonadSchema` effect would additionally initialize certain `Unique` values, which appear (nested in) the type of `Parser`.
hasura/graphql-engine-mono#518 changed the type of `memoizeOn`, to additionally allow memoizing `FieldParser`s. These also contained a `Unique` value, which was similarly initialized by the `MonadSchema` effect. The new type of `memoizeOn` was as follows:
```haskell
memoizeOn
:: forall p d a b
. (HasCallStack, HasDefinition (p n b) d, Ord a, Typeable p, Typeable a, Typeable b)
=> TH.Name
-> a
-> m (p n b)
-> m (p n b)
```
Note the type `p n b` of the value being memoized: by choosing `p` to be either `Parser k` or `FieldParser`, both can be memoized. Also note the new `HasDefinition (p n b) d` constraint, which provided a `Lens` for accessing the `Unique` value to be initialized.
A quick simplification is that the `HasCallStack` constraint has never been used by any code. This was realized in hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4713, by removing that constraint.
hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2980 removed the `Unique` value from our GraphQL-related types entirely, as their original purpose was never truly realized. One part of removing `Unique` consisted of dropping the `HasDefinition (p n b) d` constraint from `memoizeOn`.
What I didn't realize at the time was that this meant that the type of `memoizeOn` could be generalized and simplified much further. This PR finally implements that generalization. The new type is as follows:
```haskell
memoizeOn ::
forall a p.
(Ord a, Typeable a, Typeable p) =>
TH.Name ->
a ->
m p ->
m p
```
This change has a couple of consequences.
1. While constructing the schema, we often output `Maybe (Parser ...)`, to model that the existence of certain pieces of GraphQL schema sometimes depends on the permissions that a certain role has. The previous versions of `memoizeOn` were not able to handle this, as the only thing they could memoize was fully-defined (if not yet fully-evaluated) `(Field)Parser`s. This much more general API _would_ allow memoizing `Maybe (Parser ...)`s. However, we probably have to be continue being cautious with this: if we blindly memoize all `Maybe (Parser ...)`s, the resulting code may never be able to decide whether the value is `Just` or `Nothing` - i.e. it never commits to the existence-or-not of a GraphQL schema fragment. This would manifest as a non-well-founded knot tying, and this would get reported as an error by the implementation of `memoizeOn`.
tl;dr: This generalization _technically_ allows for memoizing `Maybe` values, but we probably still want to avoid doing so.
For this reason, the PR adds a specialized version of `memoizeOn` to `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Parser`.
2. There is no longer any need to connect the `MonadSchema` knot-tying effect with the `MonadParse` effect. In fact, after this PR, the `memoizeOn` method is completely GraphQL-agnostic, and so we implement hasura/graphql-engine-mono#4726, separating `memoizeOn` from `MonadParse` entirely - `memoizeOn` can be defined and implemented as a general Haskell typeclass method.
Since `MonadSchema` has been made into a single-type-parameter type class, it has been renamed to something more general, namely `MonadMemoize`. Its only task is to memoize arbitrary `Typeable p` objects under a combined key consisting of a `TH.Name` and a `Typeable a`.
Also for this reason, the new `MonadMemoize` has been moved to the more general `Control.Monad.Memoize`.
3. After this change, it's somewhat clearer what `memoizeOn` does: it memoizes an arbitrary value of a `Typeable` type. The only thing that needs to be understood in its implementation is how the manual blackholing works. There is no more semantic interaction with _any_ GraphQL code.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4725
Co-authored-by: Daniel Harvey <4729125+danieljharvey@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 089fa2e82c2ce29da76850e994eabb1e261f9c92
