## Description ✍️
This PR introduces a new feature to enable/disable event triggers during logical replication of table data for PostgreSQL and MS-SQL data sources. We introduce a new field `trigger_on_replication` in the `*_create_event_trigger` metadata API. By default the event triggers will not fire for logical data replication.
## Changelog ✍️
__Component__ : server
__Type__: feature
__Product__: community-edition
### Short Changelog
Add option to enable/disable event triggers on logically replicated tables
### Related Issues ✍
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/8814https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/GS-252
### Solution and Design
- By default, triggers do **not** fire when the session mode is `replica` in Postgres, so if the `triggerOnReplication` is set to `true` for an event trigger we run the query `ALTER TABLE #{tableTxt} ENABLE ALWAYS TRIGGER #{triggerNameTxt};` so that the trigger fires always irrespective of the `session_replication_role`
- By default, triggers do fire in case of replication in MS-SQL, so if the `triggerOnReplication` is set to `false` for an event trigger we add a clause `NOT FOR REPLICATION` to the the SQL when the trigger is created/altered, which sets the `is_not_for_replication` for the trigger as `true` and it does not fire during logical replication.
### Steps to test and verify ✍
- Run hspec integration tests for HGE
## Server checklist ✍
### Metadata ✍
Does this PR add a new Metadata feature?
- ✅ Yes
- Does `export_metadata`/`replace_metadata` supports the new metadata added?
- ✅
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6953
Co-authored-by: Puru Gupta <32328846+purugupta99@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sean Park-Ross <94021366+seanparkross@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 92731328a2bbdcad2302c829f26f9acb33c36135
What is the `Cacheable` type class about?
```haskell
class Eq a => Cacheable a where
unchanged :: Accesses -> a -> a -> Bool
default unchanged :: (Generic a, GCacheable (Rep a)) => Accesses -> a -> a -> Bool
unchanged accesses a b = gunchanged (from a) (from b) accesses
```
Its only method is an alternative to `(==)`. The added value of `unchanged` (and the additional `Accesses` argument) arises _only_ for one type, namely `Dependency`. Indeed, the `Cacheable (Dependency a)` instance is non-trivial, whereas every other `Cacheable` instance is completely boilerplate (and indeed either generated from `Generic`, or simply `unchanged _ = (==)`). The `Cacheable (Dependency a)` instance is the only one where the `Accesses` argument is not just passed onwards.
The only callsite of the `unchanged` method is in the `ArrowCache (Rule m)` method. That is to say that the `Cacheable` type class is used to decide when we can re-use parts of the schema cache between Metadata operations.
So what is the `Cacheable (Dependency a)` instance about? Normally, the output of a `Rule m a b` is re-used when the new input (of type `a`) is equal to the old one. But sometimes, that's too coarse: it might be that a certain `Rule m a b` only depends on a small part of its input of type `a`. A `Dependency` allows us to spell out what parts of `a` are being depended on, and these parts are recorded as values of types `Access a` in the state `Accesses`.
If the input `a` changes, but not in a way that touches the recorded `Accesses`, then the output `b` of that rule can be re-used without recomputing.
So now you understand _why_ we're passing `Accesses` to the `unchanged` method: `unchanged` is an equality check in disguise that just needs some additional context.
But we don't need to pass `Accesses` as a function argument. We can use the `reflection` package to pass it as type-level context. So the core of this PR is that we change the instance declaration from
```haskell
instance (Cacheable a) => Cacheable (Dependency a) where
```
to
```haskell
instance (Given Accesses, Eq a) => Eq (Dependency a) where
```
and use `(==)` instead of `unchanged`.
If you haven't seen `reflection` before: it's like a `MonadReader`, but it doesn't require a `Monad`.
In order to pass the current `Accesses` value, instead of simply passing the `Accesses` as a function argument, we need to instantiate the `Given Accesses` context. We use the `give` method from the `reflection` package for that.
```haskell
give :: forall r. Accesses -> (Given Accesses => r) -> r
unchanged :: (Given Accesses => Eq a) => Accesses -> a -> a -> Bool
unchanged accesses a b = give accesses (a == b)
```
With these three components in place, we can delete the `Cacheable` type class entirely.
The remainder of this PR is just to remove the `Cacheable` type class and its instances.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6877
GitOrigin-RevId: 7125f5e11d856e7672ab810a23d5bf5ad176e77f
>
## Description
->
This PR allows DC agents to define custom aggregate functions for their scalar types.
### Related Issues
->
GDC-189
### Solution and Design
>
We added a new property `aggregate_functions` to the scalar types capabilities. This allows the agent author to specify a set of aggregate functions supported by each scalar type, along with the function's result type.
During GraphQL schema generation, the custom aggregate functions are available via a new method `getCustomAggregateOperators` on the `Backend` type class.
Custom functions are merged with the builtin aggregate functions when building GraphQL schemas for table aggregate fields and for `order_by` operators on array relations.
### Steps to test and verify
>
• Codec tests for aggregate function capabilities have been added to the unit tests.
• Some custom aggregate operators have been added to the reference agent and are used in a new test in `api-tests`.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6199
GitOrigin-RevId: e9c0d1617af93847c1493671fdbb794f573bde0c
