<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
- Add metadata resolver for the new `OrderByExpression` metadata object
kind.
- When resolving a v1 `Model`, generate an `OrderByExpression` based on
the model's `orderable_fields`.
### How
`OrderByExpression` was added to OpenDD in
https://github.com/hasura/v3-engine/pull/780. This PR adds metadata
resolvers for this new metadata object kind. The OpenDD changes involved
a new version v2 of `Model` where `orderableFields` was moved out of the
out of the model definition. The model now references an
`OrderByExpression` instead.
To retain backwards compatibility with `Model` v1, the model metadata
resolver now extracts the `orderableFields` from a v1 model and uses
them to create a new `OrderByExpression` for internal use by the
resolved metadata.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: a7dbafe860e586efdb2e03c23020a067011c57a1
Specifically, DataConnectorColumnName and DataConnectorName which are
wrappers on `SmolStr` and hence cheap to clone.
We want to use `Plan` as a physical node in the sql layer but given
datafusion's architecture, a physical node cannot contain references.
This is a small PR towards this effort.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 284dcfb4e8e7ce83705b415611c22e8a6e25e4be
### What
Added all relevant W3C and Zipkin/B3 trace response headers, to exposed
headers for CORS.
The headers list (as pointed out by Samir) -
For Zipkin/B3:
- `X-B3-TraceId`
- `X-B3-SpanId`
- `X-B3-ParentSpanId`
- `X-B3-Sampled`
For W3C:
- `traceparent`
- `tracestate`
This is generally useful for any client accessing the API to retrieve
tracing information.
### How
Created a constant array of relevant header names. And initialize the
CORS middleware, with these as exposed headers.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: c7aaf2507b03e1897971ca6cd2bbaa06b08dfa52
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 important questions: -->
### What
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
<!-- Does this PR introduce new validation that might break old builds?
-->
<!-- Consider: do we need to put new checks behind a flag? -->
Fields involved in the relationship's inner predicates were incorrectly
reported as fields of the root model. This PR resolves the issue. Also,
fixes the predicates inside `And` or `Or` are not reported.
Note: Changelog not required, as query usage analytics are Hasura
internal and hidden from users.
### How
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
- Use `for` loop instead of `Iterator map` to avoid confusion around the
execution of lambda passed to the `map` function (more context in this
[slack](https://hasurahq.slack.com/archives/C04PUMV4X16/p1722871834852519)
thread)
- Introduce a new struct, to report predicate relationship fields, that
has a field to report its inner filter predicate usage.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 9ca23e6005ccb09f2321a2ae30ef575f99e84e06
- `DataConnectorAggregationFunctionName` and `AggregateFunctionName` now
use `str_newtype`.
- All usages of `String`s for subgraph names are removed.
(This is part of a larger effort to remove references in
`execute::plan::QueryPlan`).
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: d51f0a2335e8dabbc9efdad1d1efff285ddb74c3
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 important questions: -->
### What
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
<!-- Does this PR introduce new validation that might break old builds?
-->
<!-- Consider: do we need to put new checks behind a flag? -->
When reporting query usage analytics, mention whether a field is
deprecated.
Note: The changelog is not required, as the usage analytics are for
Hasura internal use.
### How
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
OpenDd allows marking an ObjectType's field as deprecated with an
optional reason. Plumb the deprecation context to the input/output
schema annotation. Report the field usage with a deprecated boolean
field.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 430cdcf3e1ff0c43812caecb8d06a64b729665be
### What
Add a flag `--export-traces-stdout` to log traces to stdout. Default is
disabled.
Command-line flag - `--export-traces-stdout`
Env var - `EXPORT_TRACES_STDOUT`
### How
Introduce a new command line flag. Make `initialize_tracing` accept a
`bool`, and setup the stdout exporter based on that.
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: f39d6f863fd2bca65ad89f1cef4b077aa9eabc5b
Bumps [regex](https://github.com/rust-lang/regex) from 1.10.5 to 1.10.6.
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/rust-lang/regex/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md">regex's
changelog</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h1>1.10.6 (2024-08-02)</h1>
<p>This is a new patch release with a fix for the <code>unstable</code>
crate feature that
enables <code>std::str::Pattern</code> trait integration.</p>
<p>Bug fixes:</p>
<ul>
<li>[BUG <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-lang/regex/issues/1219">#1219</a>](<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/rust-lang/regex/pull/1219">rust-lang/regex#1219</a>):
Fix the <code>Pattern</code> trait implementation as a result of nightly
API breakage.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="ab88aa5c68"><code>ab88aa5</code></a>
1.10.6</li>
<li><a
href="76f2d30d85"><code>76f2d30</code></a>
changelog: 1.10.6</li>
<li><a
href="2970d2940d"><code>2970d29</code></a>
unstable: fit <code>Pattern</code> trait implementation</li>
<li><a
href="8856fe36ac"><code>8856fe3</code></a>
regex-cli-0.2.1</li>
<li><a
href="c4c76a19b8"><code>c4c76a1</code></a>
regex-test-0.1.1</li>
<li><a
href="c2f9ca49a6"><code>c2f9ca4</code></a>
regex-test: bump toml dependency</li>
<li><a
href="1288b83af3"><code>1288b83</code></a>
regex-lite-0.1.6</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/rust-lang/regex/compare/1.10.5...1.10.6">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 527f0e7680e48f2c97e6e36acc28fab7fcc82e2a
Bumps [mockito](https://github.com/lipanski/mockito) from 1.4.0 to
1.5.0.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/lipanski/mockito/releases">mockito's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>1.5.0</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>[Breaking]</strong> <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/lipanski/mockito/pull/198">Upgrade</a>
to hyper v1</li>
</ul>
<p>Thanks to <a
href="https://github.com/tottoto"><code>@tottoto</code></a></p>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="f1c3fe1b7f"><code>f1c3fe1</code></a>
Bump to 1.5.0</li>
<li><a
href="08f2fa322d"><code>08f2fa3</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/lipanski/mockito/issues/199">#199</a>
from tottoto/refactor-response-body</li>
<li><a
href="42e3efe734"><code>42e3efe</code></a>
Refactor response body</li>
<li><a
href="f477e54857"><code>f477e54</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/lipanski/mockito/issues/198">#198</a>
from tottoto/update-to-hyper-1</li>
<li><a
href="e8694ae991"><code>e8694ae</code></a>
Update to hyper 1</li>
<li><a
href="b152b76130"><code>b152b76</code></a>
Depend on some crate directly</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/lipanski/mockito/compare/1.4.0...1.5.0">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: db7b12bcbffe55aa820bedd72ba517d9f2152bf2
Bumps [clap](https://github.com/clap-rs/clap) from 4.5.11 to 4.5.13.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/releases">clap's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v4.5.13</h2>
<h2>[4.5.13] - 2024-07-31</h2>
<h3>Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><em>(derive)</em> Improve error message when
<code>#[flatten]</code>ing an optional <code>#[group(skip)]</code></li>
<li><em>(help)</em> Properly wrap long subcommand descriptions in
help</li>
</ul>
<h2>v4.5.12</h2>
<h2>[4.5.12] - 2024-07-31</h2>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md">clap's
changelog</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>[4.5.13] - 2024-07-31</h2>
<h3>Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><em>(derive)</em> Improve error message when
<code>#[flatten]</code>ing an optional <code>#[group(skip)]</code></li>
<li><em>(help)</em> Properly wrap long subcommand descriptions in
help</li>
</ul>
<h2>[4.5.12] - 2024-07-31</h2>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="66b5a122ec"><code>66b5a12</code></a>
chore: Release</li>
<li><a
href="a83b724fc1"><code>a83b724</code></a>
docs: Update changelog</li>
<li><a
href="e19469f0e2"><code>e19469f</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/clap-rs/clap/issues/5615">#5615</a>
from epage/wrap</li>
<li><a
href="360bb3bc11"><code>360bb3b</code></a>
fix(help): Properly wrap subcommand about</li>
<li><a
href="58b5bd89ea"><code>58b5bd8</code></a>
test(help): Show bad subcommand wrapping</li>
<li><a
href="e1f6320730"><code>e1f6320</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/clap-rs/clap/issues/5614">#5614</a>
from epage/snap</li>
<li><a
href="7b5b61b021"><code>7b5b61b</code></a>
test(help): Switch to snapbox</li>
<li><a
href="1490e2434a"><code>1490e24</code></a>
chore: Update snapbox</li>
<li><a
href="6671d93500"><code>6671d93</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/clap-rs/clap/issues/5613">#5613</a>
from epage/flatten</li>
<li><a
href="13dfdb3870"><code>13dfdb3</code></a>
fix(derive): Improve flattening-skipped-group assert</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a
href="https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/compare/clap_complete-v4.5.11...v4.5.13">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 898ddf94dc4357f35e50b1599dedef672c18cd8a
Bumps [serde_with](https://github.com/jonasbb/serde_with) from 3.8.3 to
3.9.0.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/jonasbb/serde_with/releases">serde_with's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>serde_with v3.9.0</h2>
<h3>Added</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Deserialize a map` and skip all elements failing to deserialize by <a
href="https://github.com/johnmave126"><code>@johnmave126</code></a> (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/jonasbb/serde_with/issues/763">#763</a>)</p>
<p><code>MapSkipError</code> acts like a map
(<code>HashMap</code>/<code>BTreeMap</code>), but keys or values that
fail to deserialize, like are ignored.</p>
<p>For formats with heterogeneously typed maps, we can collect only the
elements where both key and value are deserializable.
This is also useful in conjunction to <code>#[serde(flatten)]</code> to
ignore some entries when capturing additional fields.</p>
<pre lang="text"><code>// JSON
"value": {"0": "v0", "5":
"v5", "str": "str", "10": 2},
<p>// Rust
#[serde_as(as = "MapSkipError<DisplayFromStr, _>")]
value: BTreeMap<u32, String>,</p>
<p>// Only deserializes entries with a numerical key and a string value,
i.e.,
{0 => "v0", 5 => "v5"}
</code></pre></p>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="c3e489f4e5"><code>c3e489f</code></a>
Bump version to 3.9.0 (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/jonasbb/serde_with/issues/770">#770</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="57ad8778c4"><code>57ad877</code></a>
Bump version to 3.9.0</li>
<li><a
href="d038657903"><code>d038657</code></a>
Implement <code>MapSkipError</code>, analogous to
<code>VecSkipError</code>, but for map-like data ...</li>
<li><a
href="aaa0a29589"><code>aaa0a29</code></a>
Update serde_with/src/guide/serde_as_transformations.md</li>
<li><a
href="17dec1112b"><code>17dec11</code></a>
Add tests to make sure syntax errors are not suppressed.</li>
<li><a
href="97543d0c2d"><code>97543d0</code></a>
Implement MapSkipError, skipping un-deserializable entries.</li>
<li><a
href="bf6724d2c0"><code>bf6724d</code></a>
Move VecSkipError to a separate file, preparing for MapSkipError</li>
<li><a
href="31e9172cab"><code>31e9172</code></a>
Fix dead code warning by correcting a typo (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/jonasbb/serde_with/issues/769">#769</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="f5b2626307"><code>f5b2626</code></a>
Fix dead code warnings in tests</li>
<li><a
href="4ad4a1b4e9"><code>4ad4a1b</code></a>
Fix dead code warning by correcting a typo</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/jonasbb/serde_with/compare/v3.8.3...v3.9.0">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: ec2c5b357a416492e2b8033138aa83075023089d
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
We would like to generate operation_name level metrics with execution
latency. Right now, the operation_name is part of validate span which
isn't really doing anything while `execute_query` is the parent span
which will represent the operation time.
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
### How
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
This PR adds `operation_name` to `execute_query` span
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: fc14d92c66b0245739d672b7570be1871243f241
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 important questions: -->
### What
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
<!-- Does this PR introduce new validation that might break old builds?
-->
<!-- Consider: do we need to put new checks behind a flag? -->
Fixes a bug where queries with nested relationship selection and filter
predicates fail due to an issue with NDC relationship collection.
```graphql
query MyQuery {
Album {
AlbumId
Title
ArtistId
Tracks {
AlbumId
Name
TrackId
}
}
}
```
A selection permission defined on the `Tracks` model with a relationship
comparison in the predicate.
### How
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
- Previously, the collection of relationships occurred independently by
traversing through the IR AST. Consequently, during planning, the
collection of local relationships was explicitly ignored. This caused
confusion and resulted in the omission of relationship collectors when
planning nested selections for local relationships, leading to the
issue.
- In this PR, the independent collection of relationships is removed.
Instead, all NDC relationships for field selection, filter, and
permission predicates are now collected during planning. This unifies
the logic, and ensures consistency in achieving the same purpose.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: cbd5bfef7a90a7d7602061a9c733ac54b764e0d3
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 important questions: -->
### What
Trying to understand what is going on here. Still no closer, but have
added a test and made some types more specific in order to clarify my
understanding.
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
<!-- Does this PR introduce new validation that might break old builds?
-->
<!-- Consider: do we need to put new checks behind a flag? -->
### How
Add some introspection tests for relationships with
`ObjectBooleanExpressionType`s to ensure they generate. Tried to make
relationship fields disappear to recreate build problems but could not.
Split `BooleanExpressionGraphqlConfig` and
`ObjectBooleanExpressionGraphqlConfig` to make sure we're not mixing
them up. We only want to use `BooleanExpressionGraphqlConfig` in
`metadata_resolve`, this ensures that.
Pushed some partiality in `schema/boolean_expressions.rs` out - a
function was `Option<inputs> -> Option<outputs>` and now it's `inputs ->
outputs`. We use `Option` a lot and it makes reasoning why something
hasn't been added to the schema difficult.
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 893e6f32bfded14ea724be7eaedc519e264f4c01
Bumps [serde_json](https://github.com/serde-rs/json) from 1.0.120 to
1.0.122.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/json/releases">serde_json's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v1.0.121</h2>
<ul>
<li>Optimize position search in error path (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/json/issues/1160">#1160</a>,
thanks <a
href="https://github.com/purplesyringa"><code>@purplesyringa</code></a>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="54381d6fee"><code>54381d6</code></a>
Release 1.0.122</li>
<li><a
href="16fb6e0b85"><code>16fb6e0</code></a>
Work around buggy rust-analyzer behavior</li>
<li><a
href="49d7d6626f"><code>49d7d66</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/json/issues/1166">#1166</a>
from dtolnay/allocvec</li>
<li><a
href="6827c7b3c5"><code>6827c7b</code></a>
Fix json! invocations when std prelude is not in scope</li>
<li><a
href="611b2a4fb6"><code>611b2a4</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/json/issues/1165">#1165</a>
from serde-rs/jsonmac</li>
<li><a
href="7633cb7f05"><code>7633cb7</code></a>
Eliminate local_inner_macros in favor of non-ident macro paths</li>
<li><a
href="eca2658a22"><code>eca2658</code></a>
Release 1.0.121</li>
<li><a
href="b0d678cfb4"><code>b0d678c</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/json/issues/1160">#1160</a>
from iex-rs/efficient-position</li>
<li><a
href="b1edc7d13f"><code>b1edc7d</code></a>
Optimize position search in error path</li>
<li><a
href="40dd7f5e86"><code>40dd7f5</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/json/issues/1159">#1159</a>
from iex-rs/fix-recursion</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/json/compare/v1.0.120...v1.0.122">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 92ae4524a7ffab84c6b55097453b2f1484a0c747
This PR fixes the following bugs:
- Fixes a bug where models and commands were allowed even though they
did not define arguments to satisfy the underlying data connector
collection/function/procedure. **UPDATE:** This only raises a warning
rather than fails the build, because existing builds on staging and
production have this issue. This will need to be transitioned to an
error once the Compatibility Date plumbing is in place.
- Fixes a bug where argument presets set in the DataConnectorLink were
sent to every connector function/procedure regardless of whether the
function/procedure actually declared that argument
- Fixes a bug where argument presets set in the DataConnectorLink were
not sent to connector collections that backed Models
- Fixes a bug where the type of the argument name in the
DataConnectorLink's argument presets was incorrect in the Open DD
schema. It was `ArgumentName` but should have been
`DataConnectorArgumentName`
- Fixes a bug where the check to ensure that argument presets in the
DataConnectorLink does not overlap with arguments defined on
Models/Commands was comparing against the Model/Command argument name
not the data connector argument name
There are a number of changes that tighten things up in this PR.
Firstly, the custom connector is improved so that it rejects requests
with arguments of the wrong type or unexpected arguments. This causes
tests that should have been failing to actually fail. Then, new tests
have been added to metadata_resolve to cover the untested edge cases
around data connector link argument presets.
Then, metadata resolve is refactored so that the link argument presets
are validated and stored on each command/model source, rather than on
the DataConnectorLink. Extra validation has been added during this
process to fix the above bugs. Any irrelevant argument presets to the
particular command/model are dropped. Then, during execution, we read
the presets from the command/model source instead of from the
DataConnectorLink, which ensures we only send the appropriate arguments.
JIRA: [V3ENGINE-290](https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/V3ENGINE-290)
Fixes
https://linear.app/hasura/issue/APIPG-676/dataconnectorlink-argument-presets-are-always-sent-regardless-of
[V3ENGINE-290]:
https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/V3ENGINE-290?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: dd02e52e1ff224760c5f0ed6a73a1ae56779e1f1
The validation added in #880 validated that the version in the
DataConnectorLink's capabilities version matched the version specified
in the schema. Unfortunately, there are existing builds with invalid
capabilities versions that failed to parse. Subsequently the validation
was removed in #907 to fix staging the deploy that broke.
This is the unique set of errors found when deploying to staging:
```
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector myts (in subgraph app) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("") is an invalid version: empty string, expected a semver version
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector my_ts (in subgraph app) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("") is an invalid version: empty string, expected a semver version
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector mydbpg (in subgraph app) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("") is an invalid version: empty string, expected a semver version
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector chinook (in subgraph app) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("") is an invalid version: empty string, expected a semver version
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector clickhouse (in subgraph analytics) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("^0.1.1") is an invalid version: unexpected character '^' while parsing major version number
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector chinook_link (in subgraph app) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("") is an invalid version: empty string, expected a semver version
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector app_connector (in subgraph app) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("^0.1.1") is an invalid version: unexpected character '^' while parsing major version number
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector chinook (in subgraph app) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("^0.1.1") is an invalid version: unexpected character '^' while parsing major version number
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector nodejs (in subgraph app) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("") is an invalid version: empty string, expected a semver version
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector db (in subgraph app) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("*") is an invalid version: unexpected character '*' while parsing major version number
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector my_pg (in subgraph my_subgraph) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("") is an invalid version: empty string, expected a semver version
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector mypg (in subgraph myapp) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("") is an invalid version: empty string, expected a semver version
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector mypglink (in subgraph mysubgraph) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("") is an invalid version: empty string, expected a semver version
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector mypg (in subgraph app2) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("") is an invalid version: empty string, expected a semver version
error generating artifacts: schema build error: invalid metadata: The data connector test_connector (in subgraph app) has an error: The version specified in the capabilities ("") is an invalid version: empty string, expected a semver version
```
The invalid versions are: `""`, `"*"`, "^0.1.1"`.
This PR restores the version validation code, but for NDC v0.1.x
capabilities (the only supported version right now, v0.2.x is feature
flagged off), we now accept versions that fail to parse as a valid
semver, and instead we raise an issue that gets logged as a warning.
NDC v0.2.x capabilities retains the stricter behaviour and does not
accept dodgy a capabilities version. This is backwards compatible
because trying to use NDC v0.2.x right now produces a build error.
Fixes APIPG-736
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 9e9bf99123bad31e8229e8ea29343eb8aaf9786d
Prior to this, on every request, a datafusion catalog provider was
created from the stored sql context. This PR reworks it so that this is
cheap and also more maintainable will fewer intermediate steps. There is
also some work done towards supporting table valued functions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Abhinav Gupta <127770473+abhinav-hasura@users.noreply.github.com>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 8c30485366969d81d2a35760962e0383ed5e488c
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 important questions: -->
### What
When no `booleanExpressionType` is specified in a
`BooleanExpressionType` `comparableRelationship`, we fallback to
whatever is defined for the model. However, we were ignoring old style
`ObjectBooleanExpressionType`, meaning relationship fields were
disappearing.
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
<!-- Does this PR introduce new validation that might break old builds?
-->
<!-- Consider: do we need to put new checks behind a flag? -->
### How
Also match on `ModelExpressionType::ObjectBooleanExpressionType` when
looking up leaf boolean expressions for relationships.
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 9a67b734679b8a1fe3d176a259ba579e127948b8
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 important questions: -->
### What
Change an error down to an issue / warning to unbreak builds.
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
<!-- Does this PR introduce new validation that might break old builds?
-->
<!-- Consider: do we need to put new checks behind a flag? -->
### How
Introduce `BooleanExpressionIssue`, move error value to it, emit this
instead. Later we'll turn this into an error based on compatibility
date.
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: f0903cc04ea1cf328c9bf67a38d76fd670743679
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 important questions: -->
### What
We emit a warning suggesting users deprecate
`DataConnectorScalarRepresentation`, however it still has uses outside
boolean expressions, so let's not advise this until it is sensible
advice.
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
<!-- Does this PR introduce new validation that might break old builds?
-->
<!-- Consider: do we need to put new checks behind a flag? -->
### How
Remove a warning.
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: a95a705d121396a09a9b626237999f032e650189
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
Closes:
https://linear.app/hasura/issue/APIPG-397/support-remote-relationship-predicates-in-permission-filters
### What
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
Allow defining permission filters with remote relationships in their
predicates.
### How
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
- Lift metadata resolve restriction for remote relationships in
permission predicates
- Abstract out the remote relationship resolving logic, in query filter,
into a new function and re-use it while resolving permission filters.
- Tests:
- A metadata build test to check the presence of essential equal
operator on source fields in relationship mapping.
- Ported all `select_many/relationship_predicate/`* tests to a new
`select_many/remote_relationship_predicate/*` with appropriate metadata
changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 9c496ecdc9829ed626354ef85e776e1afcb0dfc7
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
This pull request optimizes the `DistinctComparisons` struct in the
codebase to improve the performance of storing and checking for distinct
comparison predicates in remote relationship comparison expressions.
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
### How
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
- Replaced `Vec` with `IndexSet`: Changed the data structure used in the
DistinctComparisons struct from `Vec` to `IndexSet` to leverage the
average O(1) complexity for contains and insert operations provided by
`IndexSet`.
- Updated push Method: Modified the push method to use `IndexSet`'s
insert method directly, which simplifies the code and improves
performance.
**Performance Improvement:**
query:
```graphql
query RemoteRelationship {
Album(where: {TracksRemote: {Name: {_ilike: "%B%"}}}) {
Title
}
}
```
The `TracksRemote` predicate query yields 723 non-distinct results,
which reduce to 266 unique results after deduplication.
Benchmark used: [graphql-bench](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-bench)
configuration: autocannon - Requests Per Second strategy (50 rps) - 10
seconds duration.
Results:
- Before Optimization:
Average Latency: 38.99 ms
- After Optimization:
Average Latency: 23.32 ms
- Percentage Decrease in Latency: Approximately 40%
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 17a7160b7229eb3a2fde93273d5cf05102f9b4bd
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
Update architecture doc to include `ir` crate. Functional no-op.
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
### How
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 32f47529c97c7cfe188f098f2024e159e5ab33cc
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
`execute` is now the biggest `crate` in engine and does a lot, let's
split it into it's constituent steps.
Functional no-op.
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
### How
Split out `ir` crate from the `execute` crate. Replace export of entire
modules with that of specific types / functions. Therefore, consumers
outside the crate talk about `ir::CommandInfo` rather than
`ir::command::CommandInfo`. There is no need for other crates to know
about the internal structure of this crate.
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 47553aec63e80af7f95e659a170a2685e9ac2ce3
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
The `plan/type.rs` has become large and overwhelmed. This PR refactors
its code and removes it.
### How
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
- Move code from `plan/types.rs` into old `arguments.rs`, `filter.rs`
and new `field.rs`, `query.rs`, `mutation.rs`.
- Delete `plan/types.rs`
- Refactor code in other modules to accommodate new changes.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 0e294ca8fb4bf1d8622806f5c8b72a2bb01ccdaf
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
These checks are breaking artifact generation, so disabling them until
we can find a safer way to introduce them.
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
### How
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: ae97c87720b67384127122ed0220383036c87bbf
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
Making this match engine.
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
### How
Replace `V4` with `V6`
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: e86d118b96d41407a292f9ad4132b8ab6d06454f
In certain circumstances, all HTTP headers were included in the set of session variables. This has now been reduced to only the session variables. This change affects a number of areas, including the HTTP logs, JWT claims, rate limiting, and accessing session variables in Kriti code.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/10964
GitOrigin-RevId: fc573cd89f7c0f1a17b9e8a56396f31e70669650
### What
Telemetry-baggage is propagated via headers from incoming requests to a
service and relayed when the service itself calls another service.
However, when a service is open to the public it may not want just
anyone to be able to pass it baggage.
This PR adds the ability to configure the policy towards baggage
relaying in the tracing-util crate.
### How
When the argument `initialize_tracing(..., propagate_caller_baggage =
false)` we add to the globally defined text map propagator a derived
version of the `BaggagePropagator` which cannot extract baggage from
incoming requests, only inject its own context baggage into outgoing
requests.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: af9a51c20a8fe7ae2085e8218a4f1d5e01b26ae1
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
This allows object types to be used as arguments for comparison
operators. This is useful for Elasticsearch's `range` operator, which
allows passing an object like `{ gt: 1, lt: 100 }` to an `integer` field
in order to filter items that are greater than `1` and less than `100`.
This PR has the nice side effect of dropping the requirement to use
information from scalar `BooleanExpressionType`s in place of
`DataConnectorScalarTypes`, which we only required because we were not
looking up the comparable operator information in scalar boolean
expression types correctly.
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
### How
Previously, when using `ObjectBooleanExpressionType` and
`DataConnectorScalarRepresentation`, we had no information about the
argument types of comparison operators (ie, what values should I pass to
`_eq`?), and so inferred this by looking up the comparison operator in
the data connector schema, then looking for a
`DataConnectorScalarRepresentation` that tells us what OpenDD type that
maps to.
Now, with `BooleanExpressionType`, we have this information provided in
OpenDD itself:
```yaml
kind: BooleanExpressionType
version: v1
definition:
name: Int_comparison_exp
operand:
scalar:
type: Int
comparisonOperators:
- name: _eq
argumentType: Int! # This is an OpenDD type
- name: _within
argumentType: WithinInput!
- name: _in
argumentType: "[Int!]!"
```
Now we look up this information properly, as well as tightening up some
validation around relationships that was making us fall back to the old
way of doing things where the user had failed to provide a
`comparableRelationship` entry.
This means
a) we can actually use object types as comparable operator types
b) scalar boolean expression types aren't used outside the world of
boolean expressions, which is a lot easier to reason about.
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: ad5896c7f3dbf89a38e7a11ca9ae855a197211e3
