<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
This adds the smallest possible changes to allow the use of different
options when resolving metadata. The concrete idea is this:
- each crate (`metadata-resolve`, `schema` etc) will have a type for
their flags (if any), but don't care where they come from
- when we need to expose these experimental features through the engine
(ie, to test requests in e2e tests or something), the engine will parse
an env var such as
`EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES=allow_boolean_expression_types` and then use it
to construct `MetadataResolveFlags`, `SchemaFlags`, etc.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 64ac66569f4e31829a9117c64d2e0e265d7a7303
Bumps [serde](https://github.com/serde-rs/serde) from 1.0.201 to
1.0.202.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/releases">serde's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v1.0.202</h2>
<ul>
<li>Provide public access to RenameAllRules in serde_derive_internals
(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2743">#2743</a>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="9e32a40b1c"><code>9e32a40</code></a>
Release 1.0.202</li>
<li><a
href="87f635e54d"><code>87f635e</code></a>
Release serde_derive_internals 0.29.1</li>
<li><a
href="d4b2dfbde2"><code>d4b2dfb</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2743">#2743</a>
from dtolnay/renameallrules</li>
<li><a
href="f6ab0bc56f"><code>f6ab0bc</code></a>
Provide public access to RenameAllRules in serde_derive_internals</li>
<li><a
href="48cc2a6327"><code>48cc2a6</code></a>
Replace use of a syn From impl</li>
<li><a
href="3202a6858a"><code>3202a68</code></a>
Skip rerunning build script on library code changes</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/compare/v1.0.201...v1.0.202">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[![Dependabot compatibility
score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=serde&package-manager=cargo&previous-version=1.0.201&new-version=1.0.202)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: f6b8f6681b607a89712676456bd688a4b3cb89c3
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
There is soon to be an actual `boolean_expressions` stage so let's make
this other one clearly separate. Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: c7cbcf10dfa68bac9ba70394566b4e89f82e7742
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
In future we won't have `data_connector_object_type` available in
boolean expressions, so let's stop our dependency on it.
Also includes a couple of quality of life changes to make dealing with
NDC schema responses easier (we put them into `BTreeMap`s keyed by their
`FunctionName`, `ProcedureName`, etc.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 6d265969363fa676b24f5e78ce3f8b5dde399251
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
We're adding some tests that compare the output of metadata resolve.
Unfortunately, the results are nondeterministic because we use `HashMap`
/ `HashSet` in a lot of places. This replaces those uses with `BTreeMap`
and `BTreeSet` in `metadata-resolve`, and in a few places in `schema`
that rely on those types.
Some light reading around suggests that as well as giving us consistent
ordering, `BTree-` versions are better in terms of memory usage, esp
with < 1000 items (which I'm pretty sure most metadata items are)
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/xbkuc7/btreemap_vs_hashmap/https://users.rust-lang.org/t/hashmap-vs-btreemap/13804/2https://iq.opengenus.org/hashmap-and-btreemap-rust/
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: dbf49aefef0cd7084a3a37ef4fe9fc61257e1305
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
There is about to be a separate thing called `boolean_expression_type`,
so let's have a nice time and make the two things explicitly different.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 0035e39a2ca8657a6ded5d5f0a4f284c3e72126d
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
When trying to reproduce a remote relationships bug, I managed to find
this bug where remote relationships to commands ignore the argument
mappings. A command argument can be called one thing in the NDC itself
(ie, `id`), but we might want to expose it as `actor_id` in the engine
as that's nicer for the user. As we referred to everything with
`String`, we did not convert back to the NDC argument name when sending
information from a remote relationship, this PR fixes that.
We also add a `ConnectorArgumentName` newtype which replaces a bunch of
uses of `String`, and would have guided us towards not creating this bug
in the first place.
<!--
Questions to consider answering:
1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
5. Does the PR have limitations?
6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->
## Changelog
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [X] community-edition
- [X] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [ ] enhancement
- [X] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Fix to correctly use argument mappings when resolving remote
relationships to commands.
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 2219e50d6cb28456e60c6794dc163d9b90573f8e
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
We have a separate copy of the code for resolving type predicates that
we use for object types (when resolving BooleanExpressions), because the
previous code was heavily tied to the Model it used. We'd like to unify
that code again, so the first step is re-implementing relationships in
`resolve_model_predicate_with_type`.
<!--
Questions to consider answering:
1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
5. Does the PR have limitations?
6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->
## Changelog
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [X] community-edition
- [X] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [X] enhancement
- [ ] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Allow boolean expressions to use relationships
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 6225a4ab752b71df3cdfd0982bf2107ca39f4940
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
Much as per https://github.com/hasura/v3-engine/pull/524 for
`CommandWithPermission`, this removes the `Option` from
`ModelWithPermissions`. Again, select permissions are opt-in, so
`Some(HashMap::new())` is the same as `None`, so we can remove this
layer of indirection, which I believe was only there because we were
building up the `Model` type incrementally.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: fcb6479f32b001380ae24db6439e96339a868692
## Description
Introduce a newtype for data connector object type for the added
context.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: b499d3a9cd2610fec05a4bc2e1b3cf522f198b9c
There were multiple locations where we were implementing
`derive_more::Display` with a fixed format string, mostly of
`"Display"`. This means that the `to_string` implementations of those
types would just return `"Display"`, which is quite unhelpful.
In all cases but one, I was simply able to remove the implementation.
In the last case, `QualifiedTypeReference` had a broken implementation.
I replaced it with something more meaningful: the type name, followed by
a `"!"` if the type is non-nullable. `derive_more` was unable to help me
here so I implemented it the old-fashioned way. (I think replacing it
with an `enum` could also work.)
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 35cf573d1efab2bba0707b248ae8b74bd535d0ed
## Description
Checking my understanding by documenting some stuff. Today it is
resolved/graphql_config, which lets us change the names of hasura
features in the syntax of the graphql.
---------
Co-authored-by: Daniel Harvey <danieljamesharvey@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Samir Talwar <samir.talwar@hasura.io>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: a7053e610a1f310dfc9bab2a31e79e7b0e5110c3
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
Now that metadata resolve has a clear interface with the rest of the
engine, let's take it out into it's own crate. This will make it easier
to maintain a strong boundary between things.
To simplify imports etc, removed nested layers of modules, so now we
import `use metadata_resolve::Qualified` instead of `use
crate::metadata::resolved::Qualified`.
The changes in `engine` crate are all just updating imports.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: fb94304f7ed8883287c18bd6870045dfd69e3fe3