### Description
This PR removes `ServerConfigCtx` and `HasServerConfigCtx`. Instead, it favours different approaches:
- when the code was only using one field, it passes that field explicitly (usually `SQLGenCtx` or `CheckFeatureFlag`)
- when the code was using several fields, but in only one function, it inlines
- for the cache build, it introduces `CacheStaticConfig` and `CacheDynamicConfig`, which are subsets of `AppEnv` and `AppContext` respectively
The main goal of this is to help with the modularization of the engine: as `ServerConfigCtx` had fields whose types were imported from several unrelated parts of the engine, using it tied together parts of the engine that should not be aware of one another (such as tying together `Hasura.LogicalModel` and `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`).
The bulk of this PR is a change to the cache build, as a follow up to #8509: instead of giving the entire `ServerConfigCtx` as a incremental rule argument, we only give the new `CacheDynamicConfig` struct, which has fewer fields. The other required fields, that were coming from the `AppEnv`, are now given via the `HasCacheStaticConfig` constraint, which is a "subset" of `HasAppEnv`.
(Some further work could include moving `StringifyNumbers` out of `GraphQL.Schema.Options`, given how it is used all across the codebase, including in `RQL.DML`.)
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/8513
GitOrigin-RevId: 818cbcd71494e3cd946b06adbb02ca328a8a298e
Also add a `default` implementation for `MonadQueryTags`.
This avoids a bunch of imports on `Hasura.GraphQL.Execute.Backend` which is a big module with lots of (transitive) dependencies.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/8571
GitOrigin-RevId: 8ecca452721b77953e6d088c79d8d6f003f2996f
### Description
This monster of a PR took way too long. As the title suggests, it reduces the schema context carried in the readers to the very strict minimum. In practice, that means that to build a source, we only require:
- the global `SchemaContext`
- the global `SchemaOptions` (soon to be renamed `SchemaSourceOptions`)
- that source's `SourceInfo`
Furthermore, _we no longer carry "default" customization options throughout the schema_. All customization information is extracted from the `SourceInfo`, when required. This prevents an entire category of bugs we had previously encountered, such as parts of the code using uninitialized / unupdated customization info.
In turn, this meant that we could remove the explicit threading of the `SourceInfo` throughout the schema, since it is now always available through the reader context.
Finally, this meant making a few adjustments to relay and actions as well, such as the introduction of a new separate "context" for actions, and a change to how we create some of the action-specific postgres scalar parsers.
I'll highlight with review comments the areas of interest.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6709
GitOrigin-RevId: ea80fddcb24e2513779dd04b0b700a55f0028dd1
Just forcing some of the most numerous thunks (with -hi profiling), it
seems some of these were retaining significant amount of data
this can follow merge of, or supersede #6679
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6710
GitOrigin-RevId: d0566ee288841e264637231a7f238946aa2e3564
The main aim of the PR is:
1. To set up a module structure for 'remote-schemas' package.
2. Move parts by the remote schema codebase into the new module structure to validate it.
## Notes to the reviewer
Why a PR with large-ish diff?
1. We've been making progress on the MM project but we don't yet know long it is going to take us to get to the first milestone. To understand this better, we need to figure out the unknowns as soon as possible. Hence I've taken a stab at the first two items in the [end-state](https://gist.github.com/0x777/ca2bdc4284d21c3eec153b51dea255c9) document to figure out the unknowns. Unsurprisingly, there are a bunch of issues that we haven't discussed earlier. These are documented in the 'open questions' section.
1. The diff is large but that is only code moved around and I've added a section that documents how things are moved. In addition, there are fair number of PR comments to help with the review process.
## Changes in the PR
### Module structure
Sets up the module structure as follows:
```
Hasura/
RemoteSchema/
Metadata/
Types.hs
SchemaCache/
Types.hs
Permission.hs
RemoteRelationship.hs
Build.hs
MetadataAPI/
Types.hs
Execute.hs
```
### 1. Types representing metadata are moved
Types that capture metadata information (currently scattered across several RQL modules) are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types`.
- This new module only depends on very 'core' modules such as
`Hasura.Session` for the notion of roles and `Hasura.Incremental` for `Cacheable` typeclass.
- The requirement on database modules is avoided by generalizing the remote schemas metadata to accept an arbitrary 'r' for a remote relationship
definition.
### 2. SchemaCache related types and build logic have been moved
Types that represent remote schemas information in SchemaCache are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Types`.
Similar to `H.RS.Metadata.Types`, this module depends on 'core' modules except for `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Variable`. It has something to do with remote relationships but I haven't spent time looking into it. The validation of 'remote relationships to remote schema' is also something that needs to be looked at.
Rips out the logic that builds remote schema's SchemaCache information from the monolithic `buildSchemaCacheRule` and moves it into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Build`. Further, the `.SchemaCache.Permission` and `.SchemaCache.RemoteRelationship` have been created from existing modules that capture schema cache building logic for those two components.
This was a fair amount of work. On main, currently remote schema's SchemaCache information is built in two phases - in the first phase, 'permissions' and 'remote relationships' are ignored and in the second phase they are filled in.
While remote relationships can only be resolved after partially resolving sources and other remote schemas, the same isn't true for permissions. Further, most of the work that is done to resolve remote relationships can be moved to the first phase so that the second phase can be a very simple traversal.
This is the approach that was taken - resolve permissions and as much as remote relationships information in the first phase.
### 3. Metadata APIs related types and build logic have been moved
The types that represent remote schema related metadata APIs and the execution logic have been moved to `Hasura.RemoteSchema.MetadataAPI.Types` and `.Execute` modules respectively.
## Open questions:
1. `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types` is so called because I was hoping that all of the metadata related APIs of remote schema can be brought in at `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.API`. However, as metadata APIs depended on functions from `SchemaCache` module (see [1](ceba6d6226/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs (L55)) and [2](ceba6d6226/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs (L91)), it made more sense to create a separate top-level module for `MetadataAPI`s.
Maybe we can just have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata` and get rid of the extra nesting or have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.{Core,Permission,RemoteRelationship}` if we want to break them down further.
1. `buildRemoteSchemas` in `H.RS.SchemaCache.Build` has the following type:
```haskell
buildRemoteSchemas ::
( ArrowChoice arr,
Inc.ArrowDistribute arr,
ArrowWriter (Seq CollectedInfo) arr,
Inc.ArrowCache m arr,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
Inc.Cacheable remoteRelationshipDefinition,
ToJSON remoteRelationshipDefinition,
MonadError QErr m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
( (Inc.Dependency (HashMap RemoteSchemaName Inc.InvalidationKey), OrderedRoles),
[RemoteSchemaMetadataG remoteRelationshipDefinition]
)
`arr` HashMap RemoteSchemaName (PartiallyResolvedRemoteSchemaCtxG remoteRelationshipDefinition, MetadataObject)
```
Note the dependence on `CollectedInfo` which is defined as
```haskell
data CollectedInfo
= CIInconsistency InconsistentMetadata
| CIDependency
MetadataObject
-- ^ for error reporting on missing dependencies
SchemaObjId
SchemaDependency
deriving (Eq)
```
this pretty much means that remote schemas is dependent on types from databases, actions, ....
How do we fix this? Maybe introduce a typeclass such as `ArrowCollectRemoteSchemaDependencies` which is defined in `Hasura.RemoteSchema` and then implemented in graphql-engine?
1. The dependency on `buildSchemaCacheFor` in `.MetadataAPI.Execute` which has the following signature:
```haskell
buildSchemaCacheFor ::
(QErrM m, CacheRWM m, MetadataM m) =>
MetadataObjId ->
MetadataModifier ->
```
This can be easily resolved if we restrict what the metadata APIs are allowed to do. Currently, they operate in an unfettered access to modify SchemaCache (the `CacheRWM` constraint):
```haskell
runAddRemoteSchema ::
( QErrM m,
CacheRWM m,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
MetadataM m,
Tracing.MonadTrace m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
AddRemoteSchemaQuery ->
m EncJSON
```
This should instead be changed to restrict remote schema APIs to only modify remote schema metadata (but has access to the remote schemas part of the schema cache), this dependency is completely removed.
```haskell
runAddRemoteSchema ::
( QErrM m,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
MonadReader RemoteSchemasSchemaCache m,
MonadState RemoteSchemaMetadata m,
Tracing.MonadTrace m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
AddRemoteSchemaQuery ->
m RemoteSchemeMetadataObjId
```
The idea is that the core graphql-engine would call these functions and then call
`buildSchemaCacheFor`.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6291
GitOrigin-RevId: 51357148c6404afe70219afa71bd1d59bdf4ffc6
### Description
This PR attempts to fix several issues with source customization as it relates to remote relationships. There were several issues regarding casing: at the relationship border, we didn't properly set the target source's case, we didn't have access to the list of supported features to decide whether the feature was allowed or not, and we didn't have access to the global default.
However, all of that information is available when we build the schema cache, as we do resolve the case of some elements such as function names: we can therefore resolve source information at the same time, and simplify both the root of the schema and the remote relationship border.
To do this, this PR introduces a new type, `ResolvedSourceCustomization`, to be used in the Schema Cache, as opposed to the metadata's `SourceCustomization`, following a pattern established by a lot of other types.
### Remaining work and open questions
One major point of confusion: it seems to me that we didn't set the case at all across remote relationships, which would suggest we would use the case of the LHS source across the subset of the RHS one that is accessible through the remote relationship, which would in turn "corrupt" the parser cache and might result in the wrong case being used for that source later on. Is that assesment correct, and was I right to fix it?
Another one is that we seem not to be using the local case of the RHS to name the field in an object relationship; unless I'm mistaken we only use it for array relationships? Is that intentional?
This PR is also missing tests that would show-case the difference, and a changelog entry. To my knowledge, all the tests of this feature are in the python test suite; this could be the opportunity to move them to the hspec suite, but this might be a considerable amount of work?
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/5619
GitOrigin-RevId: 51a81b713a74575e82d9f96b51633f158ce3a47b
### Description
This PR changes all the schema code to operate in a specific `SchemaT` monad, rather than in an arbitrary `m` monad. `SchemaT` is intended to be used opaquely with `runSourceSchema` and `runRemoteSchema`. The main goal of this is to allow a different reader context per part of the schema: this PR also minimizes the contexts. This means that we no longer require `SchemaOptions` when building remote schemas' schema, and this PR therefore removes a lot of dummy / placeholder values accordingly.
### Performance and stacking
This PR has been through several iterations. #5339 was the original version, that accomplished the same thing by stacking readers on top of the stack at every remote relationship boundary. This raised performance concerns, and @0x777 confirmed with an ad-hoc test that in some extreme cases we could see up to a 10% performance impact. This version, while more verbose, allows us to unstack / re-stack the readers, and avoid that problem. #5517 adds a new benchmark set to be able to automatically measure this on every PR.
### Remaining work
- [x] a comment (or perhaps even a Note?) should be added to `SchemaT`
- [x] we probably want for #5517 to be merged first so that we can confirm the lack of performance penalty
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/5458
GitOrigin-RevId: e06b83d90da475f745b838f1fd8f8b4d9d3f4b10
