Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Vamshi Surabhi
e8e4f30dd6 server: support remote relationships on SQL Server and BigQuery (#1497)
Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST.

This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible).

The approach now changes to this:

1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed.

1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary.

1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response.

### Known issues

1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR.

1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR.

1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins.

1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST.

1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code.

### Notes to the reviewers

I think it is best reviewed commit by commit.

1. The first one is very straight forward.

1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality.  This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module.  Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore

1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor

1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server.

https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497

GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
2021-06-11 03:27:39 +00:00
Philip Lykke Carlsen
79a80c3f0a MSSQL: Validate variables in subscriptions (close #1210)
GitOrigin-RevId: 5888621dfe44f5f710c2431515114ce0e8864e61
2021-06-08 03:51:15 +00:00
Philip Lykke Carlsen
fc17132930 Revert splitting-out of variables in MSSQL
GitOrigin-RevId: 720c0e0c775c9418aea569d3f87875236fdcebfe
2021-06-01 10:05:26 +00:00
Philip Lykke Carlsen
8cc358b023 Plc/feature/mssql logging variables
GitOrigin-RevId: b67a09cbc5bb8b21857c25a0827800ca1826fa1c
2021-05-21 11:38:23 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
2152911e24 server: introduce Hasura.Base (take 2)
GitOrigin-RevId: 0dd10f1ccd338b1cf382ebff59b6ee7f209d39a1
2021-05-11 15:19:33 +00:00
Abby Sassel
1e45580e7c server/mssql: fix subscriptions (fixes #6887)
GitOrigin-RevId: 0d0184bd910400ea3a48a650fc61391fa8fd5518
2021-05-10 10:18:45 +00:00
Vamshi Surabhi
1c668dac0e server/mssql: fix aggregations
Aggregate fields - both the table and the relationship fields haven't been enabled till now. This PR fixes enables the aggregate fields and fixes an issue with root aggregate fields.

Co-authored-by: Chris Done <11019+chrisdone@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: a6d7ed9b45cda6af659a57576a8623c725a7372f
2021-04-28 11:06:26 +00:00
Abby Sassel
703928de9f mssql: support query multiplexing in subscriptions
GitOrigin-RevId: 757ceba2c1cdb1107ce0b0e41d2e70ac795d0d73
2021-04-20 16:58:13 +00:00
Vladimir Ciobanu
281cb771ff server: add MSSQL support
Co-authored-by: Rakesh Emmadi <12475069+rakeshkky@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vamshi Surabhi <6562944+0x777@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aravind K P <8335904+scriptonist@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 699c453b9692e1b822f393f23ff5e6db4e010d57
2021-02-23 17:38:36 +00:00