Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Vamshi Surabhi
e8e4f30dd6 server: support remote relationships on SQL Server and BigQuery (#1497)
Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST.

This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible).

The approach now changes to this:

1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed.

1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary.

1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response.

### Known issues

1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR.

1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR.

1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins.

1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST.

1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code.

### Notes to the reviewers

I think it is best reviewed commit by commit.

1. The first one is very straight forward.

1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality.  This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module.  Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore

1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor

1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server.

https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497

GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
2021-06-11 03:27:39 +00:00
Abby Sassel
1afa4ac3cc server/citus: feature branch
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Ciobanu <1017953+vladciobanu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ikechukwu Eze <22247592+iykekings@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Philip Lykke Carlsen <358550+plcplc@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Phil Freeman <630306+paf31@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 1b964fe5f5f50380172cb702b6a328fed782b6b7
2021-05-21 02:47:51 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
2152911e24 server: introduce Hasura.Base (take 2)
GitOrigin-RevId: 0dd10f1ccd338b1cf382ebff59b6ee7f209d39a1
2021-05-11 15:19:33 +00:00
Swann Moreau
c834629afb server: fix regression in query-log generation
Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <616387+ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 74cc6bad2274dc1587f4d3b38e444857d079a4ac
2021-04-28 17:39:02 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
ba70ca427a server: switch to a sub-backend approach
GitOrigin-RevId: 660126d5f65620fb58a3ffcbed564e9e35f59938
2021-04-21 21:45:32 +00:00
Lyndon Maydwell
33f6ffecec Generating query-log for cached requests
GitOrigin-RevId: fe620d0860854b257ab4901ad301646bacd15e0d
2021-04-19 01:23:01 +00:00
Abby Sassel
791f136d09 server/mssql: Plug in the Explain API
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 069055449f6a005f433ee80a4f92b962f21aa714
2021-04-13 11:11:23 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
71ae144aa6 server: implement transaction workaround
GitOrigin-RevId: 404f8bbdefb8a99b31fac75e4253daad81c8af90
2021-04-01 20:41:41 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
a544fe9822 server: generalized LogQueryLog (fix #708)
GitOrigin-RevId: 0e18e0f5caaa6889804debf7111ef9aa99e080b5
2021-03-13 14:41:44 +00:00
Vladimir Ciobanu
281cb771ff server: add MSSQL support
Co-authored-by: Rakesh Emmadi <12475069+rakeshkky@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vamshi Surabhi <6562944+0x777@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aravind K P <8335904+scriptonist@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 699c453b9692e1b822f393f23ff5e6db4e010d57
2021-02-23 17:38:36 +00:00