<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
update changelog for new release
### How
:)
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 6620f9923f393d190f0f2fab1aced1cff4d6aec0
Now, users can filter their queries using remote relationships in the
filter predicate. Users need to provide the relationships for comparison
in `comparableRelationships` field of the newer `BooleanExpressionType`
opendd metadata.
Minimal Algorithm:
```
Relationship: ARemoteB => Model_A -> Model_B (remote NDC)
Column Mapping: (A_column_1, B_column_1), (A_column_2, B_column_2).
query:
Model_A:
where: ARemoteB: {B_column_3: {_eq: value}}
Step 1: Fetch RHS column values (in mapping) from remote target model
SELECT B_column_1, B_column_2 from model_b_collection WHERE B_column_3 = value;
yields the following rows
[
[(B_column_1, b_value_1), (B_column_2, b_value_2)],
[(B_column_1, b_value_11), (B_column_2, b_value_22)],
]
Step 2: Using above rows the generate LHS column filter for Model_A query.
SELECT <fields> from model_a_collection WHERE
((A_column_1 = b_value_1) AND (A_column_2 = b_value_2))
OR ((A_column_1 = b_value_11) AND (A_column_2 = b_value_22))
The above comparison is equivalent to
WHERE
(A_column_1, A_column_2) IN ((b_value_1, b_value_11), (b_value_2, b_value_22))
```
Sample query:
```graphql
query MyQuery {
Track(
where: {
_or: [
{ AlbumRemote: { Artist: { ArtistId: { _eq: 2 } } } }
{ TrackId: { _eq: 3 } }
]
}
) {
TrackId
AlbumRemote {
Artist {
ArtistId
Name
}
}
}
}
```
In the query above, `AlbumRemote` is a remote relationship which targets
a model backed by a different data connector.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 7aa76fcae83e1f22de460f1eef5648fb7a35c047
### What
This PR fixes an issue where relationships that target commands do not
correctly use the data connector's argument name when making the ndc
request. Instead, they use the OpenDD argument name, which is incorrect.
For metadata where the OpenDD argument name is the same as the data
connector's argument name, the code works but only coincidentally.
### How
I've updated an existing test to change the name of the command argument
to be different from the data connector's argument name. This test
failed but is now fixed by this PR, which simply looks up the name of
the data connector argument name and uses that instead.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 71f1e812174c7bb9922792523129e4bcdce911ed
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
Filtering on nested arrays doesn't work, let's make sure it's not
allowed for now.
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
### How
Adding a check in `boolean_expression_types` stage.
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Gil Mizrahi <gil@gilmi.net>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: cc08e8c24098c1fea9b6e1ee61b82ade989dd29a
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
Update changelogs for new release.
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
### How
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 7adfd3c2c53b912bb7c4604ebed93601a201c15e
Update the changelog for new version
---------
Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: b87f16ebaa1471f010ec461be097bcfd6648c99a
### What
When generating GraphQL schema for relationship fields in model filter,
engine ignores `relation_comparisons` capability of the data connector.
Engine would generate schema for data connectors which don't have this
capability. This PR fixes that.
### How
While generating fields for the filter input type, take the relationship
capabilities into account.
The `ObjectBooleanExpressionType` and `BooleanExpressionType` objects
are quite different, hence their schema generation part is also
different, and is split in two different functions
(`build_comparable_relationships_schema`, and
`build_new_comparable_relationships_schema`). Added checking of
relationship comparison capability in both the functions.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: dce2b88f7792e01e5bb390ecdb580e223ec80f01
<!-- The PR description should answer 2 (maybe 3) important questions:
-->
### What
# BooleanExpressionType
A new metadata kind `BooleanExpressionType` can now be defined. These
can be used in place of `ObjectBooleanExpressionType` and
`DataConnectorScalarRepresentation`, and allow more granular control of
comparison operators and how they are used.
The old metadata types still work, but will eventually be deprecated.
```yaml
kind: BooleanExpressionType
version: v1
definition:
name: album_bool_exp
operand:
object:
type: Album
comparableFields:
- fieldName: AlbumId
booleanExpressionType: pg_int_comparison_exp
- fieldName: ArtistId
booleanExpressionType: pg_int_comparison_exp_with_is_null
- field: Address
booleanExpressionType: address_bool_exp
comparableRelationships:
- relationshipName: Artist
booleanExpressionType: artist_bool_exp
logicalOperators:
enable: true
isNull:
enable: true
graphql:
typeName: app_album_bool_exp
```
```yaml
kind: BooleanExpressionType
version: v1
definition:
name: pg_int_comparison_exp
operand:
scalar:
type: Int
comparisonOperators:
- name: equals
argumentType: String!
- name: _in
argumentType: [String!]!
dataConnectorOperatorMapping:
- dataConnectorName: postgres_db
dataConnectorScalarType: String
operatorMapping:
equals: _eq
logicalOperators:
enable: true
isNull:
enable: true
graphql:
typeName: app_postgres_int_bool_exp
```
<!-- What is this PR trying to accomplish (and why, if it's not
obvious)? -->
<!-- Consider: do we need to add a changelog entry? -->
### How
Remove feature flag, unhide JsonSchema items, fix a few missing bits of
JsonSchema the tests didn't warn us about before.
<!-- How is it trying to accomplish it (what are the implementation
steps)? -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: dd3055d926fdeb7446cd57085679f2492a4358a1
### What
This PR adds the ability to include internal errors in API responses via
a command line argument `--expose-internal-errors`.
The default behavior remains not to show the contents of internal error
messages.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 11c47286d3fbceeda71df3a224853633aeea8902
This PR fixes the version of the NDC Spec that Open DD's JSON schema
references when it uses NDC's schema and capabilities types in the
`DataConnectorLink`. OpenDD references 0.1.4 of NDC, but uses 0.1.3 in
the JSON schema. This corrects that.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: bdbb417b3227861dae7835f6d3bda0d1bf935ea7
NOTE: This PR is stacked on #756 and should be shipped after that is
merged.
This PR enables the existing aggregate relationships work (see #725,
#731, #756) by default by removing the experimental flag it used to be
disabled behind.
The new OpenDD schema changes that were added are also unhidden so that
they are visible in the OpenDD JSON Schema.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: cfd86d8a9ea61887ccf0f1a5d08bdcc3dda59cdc
## What
This PR introduces a changelog file, `changelog.md`.
Any PR that is not simply a technical refactor should include a relevant
entry in this file.
Additionally we also simplify the pull request template. The template
used to contain a section for a changelog entry, which is now rendered
irrelevant.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 00881d86ffe87c4c0584b88b960837543dde34b7
