## Description
There is a bug in the metadata defaults code, see [the original PR](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6286).
Steps to reproduce this issue:
* Start a new HGE project
* Start HGE with a defaults argument: `HASURA_GRAPHQL_LOG_LEVEL=debug cabal run exe:graphql-engine -- serve --enable-console --console-assets-dir=./console/static/dist --metadata-defaults='{"backend_configs": {"dataconnector": {"mongo": {"display_name": "BONGOBB", "uri": "http://localhost:8123"}}}}'`
* Add a source (doesn't need to be related to the defaults)
* Export metadata
* See that the defaults are present in the exported metadata
## Related Issues
* Github Issue: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/9237
* Jira: https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/GDC-647
* Original PR: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6286
## Solution
* The test for if defaults should be included for metadata api operations has been extended to check for updates
* Metadata inconsistencies have been hidden for `/capabilities` calls on startup
## TODO
* [x] Fix bug
* [x] Write tests
* [x] OSS Metadata Migration to correct persisted data - `server/src-rsr/migrations/47_to_48.sql`
* [x] Cloud Metadata Migration - `pro/server/res/cloud/migrations/6_to_7.sql`
* [x] Bump Catalog Version - `server/src-rsr/catalog_version.txt`
* [x] Update Catalog Versions - `server/src-rsr/catalog_versions.txt` (This will be done by Infra when creating a release)
* [x] Log connection error as it occurs *(Already being logged. Requires `--enabled-log-types startup,webhook-log,websocket-log,http-log,data-connector-log`)
* [x] Don't mark metadata inconsistencies for this call.
## Questions
* [ ] Does the `pro/server/res/cloud/migrations/6_to_7.sql` cover the cloud scenarios?
* [ ] Should we have `SET search_path` in migrations?
* [x] What should be in `server/src-rsr/catalog_versions.txt`?
## Testing
To test the solution locally run:
> docker compose up -d
and
> cabal run -- exe:api-tests --skip BigQuery --skip SQLServer --skip '/Test.API.Explain/Postgres/'
## Solution
In `runMetadataQuery` in `server/src-lib/Hasura/Server/API/Metadata.hs`:
```diff
- if (exportsMetadata _rqlMetadata)
+ if (exportsMetadata _rqlMetadata || queryModifiesMetadata _rqlMetadata)
```
This ensures that defaults aren't present in operations that serialise metadata.
Note: You might think that `X_add_source` would need the defaults to be present to add a source that references the defaults, but since the resolution occurs in the schema-cache building phase, the defaults can be excluded for the metadata modifications required for `X_add_source`.
In addition to the code-change, a metadata migration has been introduced in order to clean up serialised defaults.
The following scenarios need to be considered for both OSS and Cloud:
* The user has not had defaults serialised
* The user has had the defaults serialised and no other backends configured
* The user has had the defaults serialised and has also configured other backends
We want to remove as much of the metadata as possible without any user-specified data and this should be reflected in migration `server/src-rsr/migrations/47_to_48.sql`.
## Server checklist
### Catalog upgrade
Does this PR change Hasura Catalog version?
- ✅ Yes
### Metadata
Does this PR add a new Metadata feature?
- ✅ No
### GraphQL
- ✅ No new GraphQL schema is generated
### Breaking changes
- ✅ No Breaking changes
## Changelog
__Component__ : server
__Type__: bugfix
__Product__: community-edition
### Short Changelog
Fixes a metadata defaults serialization bug and introduces a metadata migration to correct data that has been persisted due to the bug.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/7034
GitOrigin-RevId: ad7d4f748397a1a607f2c0c886bf0fbbc3f873f2
The main aim of the PR is:
1. To set up a module structure for 'remote-schemas' package.
2. Move parts by the remote schema codebase into the new module structure to validate it.
## Notes to the reviewer
Why a PR with large-ish diff?
1. We've been making progress on the MM project but we don't yet know long it is going to take us to get to the first milestone. To understand this better, we need to figure out the unknowns as soon as possible. Hence I've taken a stab at the first two items in the [end-state](https://gist.github.com/0x777/ca2bdc4284d21c3eec153b51dea255c9) document to figure out the unknowns. Unsurprisingly, there are a bunch of issues that we haven't discussed earlier. These are documented in the 'open questions' section.
1. The diff is large but that is only code moved around and I've added a section that documents how things are moved. In addition, there are fair number of PR comments to help with the review process.
## Changes in the PR
### Module structure
Sets up the module structure as follows:
```
Hasura/
RemoteSchema/
Metadata/
Types.hs
SchemaCache/
Types.hs
Permission.hs
RemoteRelationship.hs
Build.hs
MetadataAPI/
Types.hs
Execute.hs
```
### 1. Types representing metadata are moved
Types that capture metadata information (currently scattered across several RQL modules) are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types`.
- This new module only depends on very 'core' modules such as
`Hasura.Session` for the notion of roles and `Hasura.Incremental` for `Cacheable` typeclass.
- The requirement on database modules is avoided by generalizing the remote schemas metadata to accept an arbitrary 'r' for a remote relationship
definition.
### 2. SchemaCache related types and build logic have been moved
Types that represent remote schemas information in SchemaCache are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Types`.
Similar to `H.RS.Metadata.Types`, this module depends on 'core' modules except for `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Variable`. It has something to do with remote relationships but I haven't spent time looking into it. The validation of 'remote relationships to remote schema' is also something that needs to be looked at.
Rips out the logic that builds remote schema's SchemaCache information from the monolithic `buildSchemaCacheRule` and moves it into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Build`. Further, the `.SchemaCache.Permission` and `.SchemaCache.RemoteRelationship` have been created from existing modules that capture schema cache building logic for those two components.
This was a fair amount of work. On main, currently remote schema's SchemaCache information is built in two phases - in the first phase, 'permissions' and 'remote relationships' are ignored and in the second phase they are filled in.
While remote relationships can only be resolved after partially resolving sources and other remote schemas, the same isn't true for permissions. Further, most of the work that is done to resolve remote relationships can be moved to the first phase so that the second phase can be a very simple traversal.
This is the approach that was taken - resolve permissions and as much as remote relationships information in the first phase.
### 3. Metadata APIs related types and build logic have been moved
The types that represent remote schema related metadata APIs and the execution logic have been moved to `Hasura.RemoteSchema.MetadataAPI.Types` and `.Execute` modules respectively.
## Open questions:
1. `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types` is so called because I was hoping that all of the metadata related APIs of remote schema can be brought in at `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.API`. However, as metadata APIs depended on functions from `SchemaCache` module (see [1](ceba6d6226/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs (L55)) and [2](ceba6d6226/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs (L91)), it made more sense to create a separate top-level module for `MetadataAPI`s.
Maybe we can just have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata` and get rid of the extra nesting or have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.{Core,Permission,RemoteRelationship}` if we want to break them down further.
1. `buildRemoteSchemas` in `H.RS.SchemaCache.Build` has the following type:
```haskell
buildRemoteSchemas ::
( ArrowChoice arr,
Inc.ArrowDistribute arr,
ArrowWriter (Seq CollectedInfo) arr,
Inc.ArrowCache m arr,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
Inc.Cacheable remoteRelationshipDefinition,
ToJSON remoteRelationshipDefinition,
MonadError QErr m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
( (Inc.Dependency (HashMap RemoteSchemaName Inc.InvalidationKey), OrderedRoles),
[RemoteSchemaMetadataG remoteRelationshipDefinition]
)
`arr` HashMap RemoteSchemaName (PartiallyResolvedRemoteSchemaCtxG remoteRelationshipDefinition, MetadataObject)
```
Note the dependence on `CollectedInfo` which is defined as
```haskell
data CollectedInfo
= CIInconsistency InconsistentMetadata
| CIDependency
MetadataObject
-- ^ for error reporting on missing dependencies
SchemaObjId
SchemaDependency
deriving (Eq)
```
this pretty much means that remote schemas is dependent on types from databases, actions, ....
How do we fix this? Maybe introduce a typeclass such as `ArrowCollectRemoteSchemaDependencies` which is defined in `Hasura.RemoteSchema` and then implemented in graphql-engine?
1. The dependency on `buildSchemaCacheFor` in `.MetadataAPI.Execute` which has the following signature:
```haskell
buildSchemaCacheFor ::
(QErrM m, CacheRWM m, MetadataM m) =>
MetadataObjId ->
MetadataModifier ->
```
This can be easily resolved if we restrict what the metadata APIs are allowed to do. Currently, they operate in an unfettered access to modify SchemaCache (the `CacheRWM` constraint):
```haskell
runAddRemoteSchema ::
( QErrM m,
CacheRWM m,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
MetadataM m,
Tracing.MonadTrace m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
AddRemoteSchemaQuery ->
m EncJSON
```
This should instead be changed to restrict remote schema APIs to only modify remote schema metadata (but has access to the remote schemas part of the schema cache), this dependency is completely removed.
```haskell
runAddRemoteSchema ::
( QErrM m,
MonadIO m,
HasHttpManagerM m,
MonadReader RemoteSchemasSchemaCache m,
MonadState RemoteSchemaMetadata m,
Tracing.MonadTrace m
) =>
Env.Environment ->
AddRemoteSchemaQuery ->
m RemoteSchemeMetadataObjId
```
The idea is that the core graphql-engine would call these functions and then call
`buildSchemaCacheFor`.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6291
GitOrigin-RevId: 51357148c6404afe70219afa71bd1d59bdf4ffc6
## Description
This PR removes `RQL.Types`, which was now only re-exporting a bunch of unrelated modules.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4363
GitOrigin-RevId: 894f29a19bff70b3dad8abc5d9858434d5065417
### Description
Small PR that moves code out of `RQL.Types.hs`. Specifically, it moves `HasServerConfigCtx` to where `ServerConfigCtx` is defined. This removes code from `RQL.Types`, makes the dependency on `Server.Types` more explicit, and will make some further cleanups easier.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4336
GitOrigin-RevId: 95bb3467d741763892c4e68a38760497157ba1aa
### Description
This is it! This PR enables the Metadata API for remote relationships from remote schemas, adds tests, ~~adds documentation~~, adds an entry to the Changelog. This is the release PR that enables the feature.
### Checklist
- [ ] Tests:
- [x] RS-to-Postgres (high level)
- [x] RS-to-RS (high level)
- [x] From RS specifically (testing for edge cases)
- [x] Metadata API tests
- [ ] Unit testing the actual engine?
- [x] Changelog entry
- [ ] Documentation?
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3974
Co-authored-by: Vamshi Surabhi <6562944+0x777@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Bharathi <4211715+scriptnull@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: c9aebf12e6eebef8d264ea831a327b968d4be9d2
### Description
This small PR improves the representation of an endpoint method from `Text` to an enum of the supported methods. Additionally, it cleans some of the instances defined on surrounding types (such as Postgres-specific instances on Endpoint types).
Due to a name conflict, this makes `RQL.Types.Endpoint` impossible to re-export from `RQL.Types`, which in turn forces several other modules to import it explicitly, which I think is fine since we want to ultimately get rid of `RQL.Types`.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3965
GitOrigin-RevId: 33869007d0d818ddf486fb61d1f6099f9dad7570
spec: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2278
Briefly:
- extend metadata so that allowlist entries get a new scope field
- update `add_collection_to_allowlist` to accept this new scope field,
and adds `update_scope_of_collection_in_allowlist` to change the scope
- scope can be global or role-based; a collection is available for every
role if it is global, and available to every listed role if it is role-based
- graphql-engine-oss is aware of role-based allowlist metadata; collections
with non-global scope are treated as if they weren't in the allowlist
To run the tests:
- `cabal run graphql-engine-tests -- unit --match Allowlist`
- py-tests against pro:
- launch `graphql-engine-pro` with `HASURA_GRAPHQL_ADMIN_SECRET` and `HASURA_GRAPHQL_ENABLE_ALLOWLIST`
- `pytest test_allowlist_queries.py --hge-urls=... --pg-urls=... --hge-key=... --test-allowlist-queries --pro-tests`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2477
Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <616387+ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert <132113+robx@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 01f8026fbe59d8701e2de30986511a452fce1a99
## Remaining Work
- [x] changelog entry
- [x] more tests: `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` is definitely untested
- [x] negative tests: we probably want to assert that there are some APIs we DON'T support
- [x] update the console to use the new API, if necessary
- [x] ~~adding the corresponding documentation for the API for other backends (only `pg_` was added here)~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170
- [x] ~~deciding which backends should support this API~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3170
- [x] ~~deciding what to do about potentially overlapping schematic representations~~
- ~~cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#issuecomment-995307624~~
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3171
- [x] ~~add more descriptive versioning information to some of the types that are changing in this PR~~
- cf. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157#discussion_r769830920
- deferred to https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/3172
## Description
This PR fixes several important issues wrt. the remote relationship API.
- it fixes a regression introduced by [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124), which prevented `<backend>_create_remote_relationship` from accepting the old argument format (break of backwards compatibility, broke the console)
- it removes the command `create_remote_relationship` added to the v1/metadata API as a work-around as part of [#3124](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124)
- it reverts the subsequent fix in the console: [#3149](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3149)
Furthermore, this PR also addresses two other issues:
- THE DOCUMENTATION OF THE METADATA API WAS WRONG, and documented `create_remote_relationship` instead of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`: this PR fixes this by adding `pg_` everywhere, but does not attempt to add the corresponding documentation for other backends, partly because:
- `<backend>_delete_remote_relationship` WAS BROKEN ON NON-POSTGRES BACKENDS; it always expected an argument parameterized by Postgres.
As of main, the `<backend>_(create|update|delete)_remote_relationship` commands are supported on Postgres, Citus, BigQuery, but **NOT MSSQL**. I do not know if this is intentional or not, if it even should be publicized or not, and as a result this PR doesn't change this.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3157
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 37e2f41522a9229a11c595574c3f4984317d652a
## Description
This PR fixes two issues:
- in [#2903](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2903), we introduced a new metadata representation of remote relationships, which broke parsing a metadata blob containing an old-style db-to-rs remote relationship
- in [#1179](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1179), we silently and mistakenly deprecated `create_remote_relationship` in favour of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 45481db7a8d42c7612e938707cd2d652c4c81bf8
GraphQL types can refer to each other in a circular way. The PDV framework used to use values of type `Unique` to recognize two fragments of GraphQL schema as being the same instance. Internally, this is based on `Data.Unique` from the `base` package, which simply increases a counter on every creation of a `Unique` object.
**NB**: The `Unique` values are _not_ used for knot tying the schema combinators themselves (i.e. `Parser`s). The knot tying for `Parser`s is purely based on keys provided to `memoizeOn`. The `Unique` values are _only_ used to recognize two pieces of GraphQL _schema_ as being identical. Originally, the idea was that this would help us with a perfectly correct identification of GraphQL types. But this fully correct equality checking of GraphQL types was never implemented, and does not seem to be necessary to prevent bugs.
Specifically, these `Unique` values are stored as part of `data Definition a`, which specifies a part of our internal abstract syntax tree for the GraphQL types that we expose. The `Unique` values get initialized by the `SchemaT` effect.
In #2894 and #2895, we are experimenting with how (parts of) the GraphQL types can be hidden behind certain permission predicates. This would allow a single GraphQL schema in memory to serve all roles, implementing #2711. The permission predicates get evaluated at query parsing time when we know what role is doing a certain request, thus outputting the correct GraphQL types for that role.
If the approach of #2895 is followed, then the `Definition` objects, and thus the `Unique` values, would be hidden behind the permission predicates. Since the permission predicates are evaluated only after the schema is already supposed to be built, this means that the permission predicates would prevent us from initializing the `Unique` values, rendering them useless.
The simplest remedy to this is to remove our usage of `Unique` altogether from the GraphQL schema and schema combinators. It doesn't serve a functional purpose, doesn't prevent bugs, and requires extra bookkeeping.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2980
GitOrigin-RevId: 50d3f9e0b9fbf578ac49c8fc773ba64a94b1f43d
