During the "generalization" of the code, we removed the [generated instances](9d63187803 (diff-7b8382ab20e441fa214586be491eb6f7ca904d8b20ed97894c16a339be45219aL72)) of `Eq` and `Hashable` in favour of manually written ones, because for a time we were struggling with `AnyBackend`.
In the process, we lost one constructor, `MOEndpoint`. It's unlikely to have ever been an issue, since duplicate endpoints are unlikely, but it is nonetheless wrong.
This PR simply goes back to default derived instances, now that we can, fixing the problem and making the code simpler.
---
However, after filing this PR, I realized **it broke rest endpoint tests**. Upon closer inspection, it turns out that while we had proper checks in place, because of this bug we were actually failing _differently_ during metadata checks. This PR actually improves error messages for invalid endpoint configurations?! 🙀
This is a tiny bit scary. ^^'
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1762
GitOrigin-RevId: c4897d1f3ae92d18c44c87d2f58258c66f716686
I finally got fed up trying to decipher the messages from failing assertions in integration tests and was thus spurred into action :-)
Instead of using the `repr(..)` format for the `OrderedDict`s of query responses we now deliberately format them as JSON with indentation.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1751
GitOrigin-RevId: 1ca0d03ff52950095b89b447d9625d6481bc7177
Blocked on https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1640.
While fiddling with BigQuery I noticed a severe issue with offset/limit for array-aggregates. I've fixed it now.
The basic problem was that I was using a query like this:
```graphql
query MyQuery {
hasura_Artist(order_by: {artist_self_id: asc}) {
artist_self_id
albums_aggregate(order_by: {album_self_id: asc}, limit: 2) {
nodes {
album_self_id
}
aggregate {
count
}
}
}
}
```
Producing this SQL:
```sql
SELECT `t_Artist1`.`artist_self_id` AS `artist_self_id`,
STRUCT(IFNULL(`aa_albums1`.`nodes`, NULL) AS `nodes`, IFNULL(`aa_albums1`.`aggregate`, STRUCT(0 AS `count`)) AS `aggregate`) AS `albums_aggregate`
FROM `hasura`.`Artist` AS `t_Artist1`
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT ARRAY_AGG(STRUCT(`t_Album1`.`album_self_id` AS `album_self_id`) ORDER BY (`t_Album1`.`album_self_id`) ASC) AS `nodes`,
STRUCT(COUNT(*) AS `count`) AS `aggregate`,
`t_Album1`.`artist_other_id` AS `artist_other_id`
FROM (SELECT *
FROM `hasura`.`Album` AS `t_Album1`
ORDER BY (`t_Album1`.`album_self_id`) ASC NULLS FIRST
-- PROBLEM HERE
LIMIT @param0) AS `t_Album1`
GROUP BY `t_Album1`.`artist_other_id`)
AS `aa_albums1`
ON (`aa_albums1`.`artist_other_id` = `t_Artist1`.`artist_self_id`)
ORDER BY (`t_Artist1`.`artist_self_id`) ASC NULLS FIRST
```
Note the `LIMIT @param0` -- that is incorrect because we want to limit
per artist. Instead, we want:
```sql
SELECT `t_Artist1`.`artist_self_id` AS `artist_self_id`,
STRUCT(IFNULL(`aa_albums1`.`nodes`, NULL) AS `nodes`, IFNULL(`aa_albums1`.`aggregate`, STRUCT(0 AS `count`)) AS `aggregate`) AS `albums_aggregate`
FROM `hasura`.`Artist` AS `t_Artist1`
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT ARRAY_AGG(STRUCT(`t_Album1`.`album_self_id` AS `album_self_id`) ORDER BY (`t_Album1`.`album_self_id`) ASC) AS `nodes`,
STRUCT(COUNT(*) AS `count`) AS `aggregate`,
`t_Album1`.`artist_other_id` AS `artist_other_id`
FROM (SELECT *,
-- ADDED
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY artist_other_id) artist_album_index
FROM `hasura`.`Album` AS `t_Album1`
ORDER BY (`t_Album1`.`album_self_id`) ASC NULLS FIRST
) AS `t_Album1`
-- CHANGED
WHERE artist_album_index <= @param
GROUP BY `t_Album1`.`artist_other_id`)
AS `aa_albums1`
ON (`aa_albums1`.`artist_other_id` = `t_Artist1`.`artist_self_id`)
ORDER BY (`t_Artist1`.`artist_self_id`) ASC NULLS FIRST
```
That serves both the LIMIT/OFFSET function in the where clause. Then,
both the ARRAY_AGG and the COUNT are correct per artist.
I've updated my Haskell test suite to add regression tests for this. I'll push a commit for Python tests shortly. The tests still pass there.
This just fixes a case that we hadn't noticed.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1641
GitOrigin-RevId: 49933fa5e09a9306c89565743ecccf2cb54eaa80
* fix resetting the catalog version to 43 on migration from 1.0 to 2.0
* ci: remove applying patch in test_oss_server_upgrade job
* make the 43 to 46th migrations idempotent
* Set missing HASURA_GRAPHQL_EVENTS_HTTP_POOL_SIZE=8 in upgrade_test
It's not clear why this wasn't caught in CI.
* ci: disable one component of event backpressure test
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Bharathi P <vishnubharathi04@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Karthikeyan Chinnakonda <karthikeyan@hasura.io>
Co-authored-by: Brandon Simmons <brandon@hasura.io>
GitOrigin-RevId: c74c6425266a99165c6beecc3e4f7c34e6884d4d
A pull request for cleaning up small issues, bugs, redundancies and missing things in the BigQuery backend.
Summary:
1. Remove duplicate projection fields - BigQuery rejects these.
2. Add order_by to the test suite cases, as it was returning inconsistent results.
3. Add lots of in FromIr about how the dataloader approach is given support.
4. Produce the correct output structure for aggregates:
a. Should be a singleton object for a top-level aggregate query.
b. Should have appropriate aggregate{} and nodes{} labels.
c. **Support for nodes** (via array_agg).
5. Smooth over support of array aggregates by removing the fields used for joining with an explicit projection of each wanted field.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1317
Co-authored-by: Vamshi Surabhi <6562944+0x777@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: cd3899f4667770a27055f94988ef2a6d5808f1f5
Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST.
This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible).
The approach now changes to this:
1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed.
1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary.
1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response.
### Known issues
1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR.
1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR.
1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins.
1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST.
1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code.
### Notes to the reviewers
I think it is best reviewed commit by commit.
1. The first one is very straight forward.
1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality. This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module. Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore
1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor
1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497
GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
This reverts the remote schema type customisation and namespacing feature temporarily as we test for certain conditions.
GitOrigin-RevId: f8ee97233da4597f703970c3998664c03582d8e7
