Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Antoine Leblanc
90d3192df2 Unified remote relationship metadata
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2903
Co-authored-by: Vamshi Surabhi <6562944+0x777@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 11fd6efe8cea246471e525cfb5bad66fa53ccaf9
2021-12-01 04:54:30 +00:00
Robert
11a454c2d6 server, pro: actually reformat the code-base using ormolu
This commit applies ormolu to the whole Haskell code base by running `make format`.

For in-flight branches, simply merging changes from `main` will result in merge conflicts.
To avoid this, update your branch using the following instructions. Replace `<format-commit>`
by the hash of *this* commit.

$ git checkout my-feature-branch
$ git merge <format-commit>^    # and resolve conflicts normally
$ make format
$ git commit -a -m "reformat with ormolu"
$ git merge -s ours post-ormolu

https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2404

GitOrigin-RevId: 75049f5c12f430c615eafb4c6b8e83e371e01c8e
2021-09-23 22:57:37 +00:00
Karthikeyan Chinnakonda
5f79b5f102 server: generalize the event triggers codepath for all backends
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2189

Co-authored-by: hasura-bot <30118761+hasura-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Mark <74692114+martin-hasura@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Bharathi <4211715+scriptnull@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sameer Kolhar <6604943+kolharsam@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matt Hardman <28978422+mattshardman@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vijay Prasanna <11921040+vijayprasanna13@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Divi <32202683+imperfect-fourth@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 97c71571656c6e0c57d06f2d38193833180901c0
2021-09-20 07:35:49 +00:00
Karthikeyan Chinnakonda
3247c8bd71 server: generalize event triggers - incremental PR 2
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2270

GitOrigin-RevId: d7644b25d3ee57ffa630de15ae692c1bfa03b4f6
2021-09-09 11:55:11 +00:00
Vamshi Surabhi
e8e4f30dd6 server: support remote relationships on SQL Server and BigQuery (#1497)
Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST.

This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible).

The approach now changes to this:

1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed.

1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary.

1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response.

### Known issues

1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR.

1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR.

1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins.

1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST.

1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code.

### Notes to the reviewers

I think it is best reviewed commit by commit.

1. The first one is very straight forward.

1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality.  This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module.  Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore

1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor

1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server.

https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497

GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
2021-06-11 03:27:39 +00:00
Abby Sassel
1afa4ac3cc server/citus: feature branch
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Ciobanu <1017953+vladciobanu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ikechukwu Eze <22247592+iykekings@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Philip Lykke Carlsen <358550+plcplc@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Phil Freeman <630306+paf31@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 1b964fe5f5f50380172cb702b6a328fed782b6b7
2021-05-21 02:47:51 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
ba70ca427a server: switch to a sub-backend approach
GitOrigin-RevId: 660126d5f65620fb58a3ffcbed564e9e35f59938
2021-04-21 21:45:32 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
1abe5d4902 server: combine instance imports
GitOrigin-RevId: 4deab805ceef1202e5a2d04f0568fa33df3ff791
2021-03-18 17:40:45 +00:00