See: https://github.com/grafana/k6/issues/2685
It might be interesting to think about taking into consideration decompression time when thinking about performance, but In general I think doing so is surprising and I wasted a lot of time trying to figure out why my optimizations to the compression codepath weren't improving things to the degree I expected
The downside here is we lose error reporting, so you'll need to only set
discardResponseBodies: true after the query has been tested.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/5940
GitOrigin-RevId: 82a589a59b93f10ffb5391e4a3190459fb6e613b
…rking metadata operations
And add an initial benchmark for replace_metadata, to unblock some
performance improvements to that op in a PR to be merged after this.
This is an MVP just to have something in CI to reference when optimizing
metadata operations. See TODO for roadmap.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3673
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 968d1f92ca79c78ad90b2304d2214069bc739621
This excercises a different code path from regular queries and is
pretty slow. Motivated by https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2835
We may need to break chinook up into two sets if it keeps growing or
becomes a bottleneck, but do that later.
GitOrigin-RevId: 5832aef520db85f694924e038c0f2c9a7dd17a13
