<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
We have a set of tests in `metadata-resolve` that uses globs to find
files in either `passing` or `failing` folders and check them. This
allows those files to live in nested folders for tidyness. Functional
no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 22d42e986676a110f455c59c3df9e6946c5d996c
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
This adds the ability to describe nested object boolean expressions,
which become `fieldPath` items in the generated
`ndc_models::ComparisonTarget::Column` items. This allows us to describe
filtering a `User` based on some element in their nested `address` field
(like `postcode`, for example).
Like the other `BooleanExpressionType` work, this remains behind a
feature flag so should make no user-facing changes.
It is also missing a whole heap of metadata resolve checks, going to
follow with these after doing the happy path to unblock other work.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: c89e2942a651d349fca97706affcf40d91afeefb
## Description
This PR implements argument presets for `DataConnectorLink`, which can
be used to forward request headers as function/procedure arguments to
NDC. This PR implements the execution part.
**Note**: response header forwarding is not implemented yet.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: ff69129aee3e3052367ca42acdec3922cbc2cb0c
## Description
This PR implements argument presets and response headers for
`DataConnectorLink`, which can be used to forward request headers as
function/procedure arguments to NDC, and also forward response headers
from NDC back to the client. This PR implements only the OpenDD changes
and metadata resolving part.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 2b7f20af7c2f192c0103553bccb000114dcba916
Previously we required an operator called `_eq` to be called `_eq` in
all data connectors that used it.
Now we can give them nice names, and map each one to a different
operator name per data connector.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 1d2f678e25d932e5ea45d34999cf5709ef0038b4
## Description
JIRA: https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/V3ENGINE-180
Fix an edge case where the function
`build_annotations_from_input_object_type_permissions` produce infinite
recursions
when an input object type contains fields with self-referential types.
Note: This PR doesn't contain any tests. They'll be added in a separate
PR ([JIRA](https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/V3ENGINE-188)). This
fix needs to be done quickly and merged as other teams (graphql
connector) are blocked by this.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 4cc09cb96871804d4daf83d7e49a6f4529c1943d
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
This makes the absolute happiest path `BooleanExpressionType` work.
Caveats:
- We ignore operator mappings, so we assume that the OpenDD operator
name (ie, `_eq`) is the same as the data connector's name for it.
- We have not tried to implement `comparisonRelationships` in any way
yet.
- Have not tried nested objects yet.
All functionality here is behind a feature flag so has no user-facing
impact.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 5edb706c6d8b03b9fa59433ce24f05f37a69729a
## Description
There is a bug in NDC validation of command where it returns early
without validating. This is because we perform the NDC validation right
after resolving the command source, but haven't attached the "resolved
command source" to the command yet. As a result the command's source is
`None`, and the validation does an early return.
This PR fixes it by taking the command source directly. If there is no
source to resolve, we don't have to perform any NDC validation of the
command.
Note: this is not the case with models. Model's source resolving
attaches the "resolved source", then performs the validation.
## Changelog
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [x] community-edition
- [x] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [ ] enhancement
- [x] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Fix skipping of NDC validation of commands due to wrong assumption.
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 5b9f4c922ee83394f1b6fe840cd934b6e138e2e9
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
We were using `String` for these, and making some assumptions about NDCs
and OpenDD operator names being the same. This uses newtypes and
documents where these assumptions are being made. Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 195e55db6fadf48c956684130e23f647eaa17fb1
Calling `.to_owned()` on a reference, `.to_vec()` on a vector reference,
etc. are just synonyms for `.clone()` which are less explicit about
cloning. Let's be explicit.
This also removes some unnecessary clones.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 1bc00c4106f0346303d73e4268c89030c0ce93fc
## Description
Tiny PR to add some comments and clarifications to the data connector
resolve types.
Also, rearranges the types and functions to make the flow clearer.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: db5b18cbd7c79670c9dfc68c80950ccf5105f9ce
1. Use `map_or(…, …)` instead of `.map(…).unwrap_or(…)`.
2. Use `.is_some_and(…)` instead of `.map(…).unwrap_or_default(…)`.
3. Nest `|` patterns where possible.
4. Be more specific about match patterns.
I found I could also simplify `typecheck_qualified_type_reference`
considerably.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 6a3b1a4c525c0187c2fdb6df0c979ca0b7b3016c
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
We pass around `scalar_type_name` but never need it, removing it makes
boolean expressions easier to implement, so split into a fresh PR.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 0e4df8da4cb15d90a7f7be068b40c47936b70734
1. Always name the struct when calling `default()`.
2. Sort construction according to the definitions.
3. Approve allowing `struct_field_names` because it doesn't seem to be
helpful.
4. Enable `manual_string_new`; nothing seems to be triggering it now.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 868742114b0bf27bc3ea03cdf1e63a0f710ebe33
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
Broke this out of new bool exps work, breaks this big function into
smaller functions with clearer dependencies. Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 4f85132f9c381977b1cd406bb71e278c45866691
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
This somewhat resolves the `BooleanExpressionType` metadata type.
There is a lot that is missing, but everything is behind a feature so I
want to merge what is here before moving onto getting it working with
the later parts of the pipeline. We'll start with a lot of duplication
and then work to remove as much as we can.
Functional no-op for users, the feature flag is not exposed to the
actual binary.
How to review this PR:
- Check that any changes to existing code are cosmetic and naming-only
to ensure this is a no-op
- Look through the new resolve step and compare it to the
[RFC](https://github.com/hasura/v3-engine/blob/main/rfcs/open-dd-expression-type-changes.md)
and see if it is doing roughly what you might expect.
- Don't get too bogged down in missing things / style stuff, there are
definitely missing things and bad style.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 24e3b3e72e62d0094db3b461cb8c6d359982755d
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
The field mappings for an object type are the mappings between the
OpenDD field name (`FieldName`) and whatever the NDC column name
(`DataConnectorColumnName`) are.
Type mappings is a map from OpenDD type names
(`Qualified<CustomTypeName>`) to the field mappings for that type.
Previously, Boolean Expressions were attached to a single data connector
and object type. Now we are generalising them so that they can be used
across any of the multiple data connectors that their attached
ObjectType might have type mappings for.
To do this, we stop including them in the resolved
`ObjectBooleanExpressionType`, and instead fetch the relevant type
mappings from whichever thing is using the boolean expression type,
usually the `ModelSource` for a `Model`.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 4a251473b4aecedf4ede0e79aa7b577e25207cb8
Just because it's fewer lines of code.
1. Invert `if`/`else` blocks with negative conditions.
2. Unwrap redundant `else` blocks.
3. Simplify a few branches to `let … else`.
4. Replace a `match` with `if let`.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 4f10730b688d21c1fc86a45ee5fb4adf008b3d94
## Description
This avoids a query to `/capabilities` when explaining.
## Changelog
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [x] community-edition
- [x] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [ ] enhancement
- [ ] bugfix
- [x] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
The engine no longer makes a request to NDC capabilities when explaining
a query or mutation, instead using the stored capabilities from the
build.
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: f38867e0f5a832c45a857c5e58d7a44c1c05d71f
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
Once again I found myself getting confused as to what a `String` meant
so I wrapped it up in a newtype and then found a bug and fixed it as a
result.
(nearly) functional no-op.
<!--
Questions to consider answering:
1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
5. Does the PR have limitations?
6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->
## Changelog
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [X] community-edition
- [X] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [ ] enhancement
- [X] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Use field mappings more consistently when following remote joins.
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: dd4fff5c4c8f5d1e50742c046b62cb7ddec3f467
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
This doesn't do anything. Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 4a9e35bae95ef3bf9c11de6d15f93031d0976311
## Description
We use few HTTP types (URL, http header name, value, header map etc.) in
the resolved metadata, which needs to be serialized. We have newtype
wrappers around them to implement serialization/deserialization.
This PR moves them to a separate helper module.
And also introduces a new type `SerializableHeaderName` which is
required in an upcoming PR of forwarding request headers to NDC.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 4f907a652a9826bc52996fa37d2a7590f24ee30a
Fix some warnings flagged by Clippy.
1. Elide `.into_iter()` where it's unnecessary.
2. Favor `&` over `.iter()`.
3. Use `.values()` on maps instead of discarding keys by destructuring.
4. Avoid `::from_iter(…)` in favor of `.collect()`.
I also replaced a call to `.cloned()` with `.copied()`.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 7d39665b0cd04f5bae9405c0ff5f044f57433f32
Got confused by more `String` types, turns out we already had more
accurate types for these things. Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: a9c73024ab23233a73934bb2cd3741b3b4d7a378
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
In https://github.com/hasura/v3-engine/pull/599 we added new
`BooleanExpressionType` to OpenDD. It included a number of helpful
newtypes such as `DataConnectorScalarType` that replace uses of raw
string and make intent inside engine code easier to follow. This change
uses that newtype everywhere in `metadata-resolve`.
<!--
Questions to consider answering:
1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
5. Does the PR have limitations?
6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->
## Changelog
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [X] community-edition
- [X] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [X] enhancement
- [ ] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Use `DataConnectorScalarType` string newtype internallly and in OpenDD
types.
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: b44709f39b30f25908106110f62c72e3d13b4eb6
`test_each::path` always gives us a `PathBuf` even if we don't want one,
so we need to suppress the associated warning.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 4f2bb29122df6979ad378227fb88e4632d3551f7
## Description
If the user specified their orderings in their GraphqlConfig in a
different order, they would be presented with an error.
```yaml
enumTypeNames:
- directions: # Reversed ordering of this list
- Desc
- Asc
typeName: OrderBy
```
> ERR Code=opendds-validation Message="invalid metadata: error building
schema: unable to build schema: metadata is not consistent: invalid
directions: Desc,Asc defined in orderByInput of GraphqlConfig ,
currenlty there is no support for partial directions. Please specify a
type which has both 'asc' and 'desc' directions"
7:56PM ERR Supergraph Build failed.
This has been fixed.
## Changelog
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [x] community-edition
- [x] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [ ] enhancement
- [x] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Fixed arbitrary ordering of directions in GraphqlConfig causing invalid
error
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: b27a0dd3b5c665f54ea58a40af8b2b1bfb0d2434
## Description
With #613 merged, it is safe to create an `__globals` subgraph into
which we can sort all supergraph config. This PR gives supergraph
objects a qualified name (using the `__globals` subgraph). Note that
outside of debugging/tracing, this is functionally a no-op: we strip the
subgraph from the objects as soon as we use them, because the global
nature of the config means that this is irrelevant information.
<!--
Questions to consider answering:
1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
5. Does the PR have limitations?
6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->
## Changelog
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [x] community-edition
- [x] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [ ] enhancement
- [ ] bugfix
- [x] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Metadata config declared under the `supergraph` field will now appear as
part of an `__globals` subgraph in tracing. Note that the field can also
be omitted and the config placed in a user-named subgraph.
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 84d2beed98f843df246c8562188cdf7de63643fc
## Description
Parallel to #611, in service of removing supergraph config, we'd like to
map all current supergraph config into a generated subgraph. To ensure
that we don't end up with an unfortunate naming collision, I've decided
to refine the definition of a subgraph identifier to exclude any string
starting with `__internal`, which we can then have as our "internal
namespace". This change introduces the new type, and updates the
"unknown_namespace" subgraph to come under this umbrella.
This change should be a no-op to any user who hasn't used a subgraph
name prefixed with `__internal`.
<!--
Questions to consider answering:
1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
5. Does the PR have limitations?
6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->
## Changelog
User-defined subgraphs may no longer be given names that start with
`__internal`, as this will be reserved for internally generated
subgraphs.
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [x] community-edition
- [x] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [ ] enhancement
- [ ] bugfix
- [x] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
User-defined subgraphs may no longer have names that start with
`__internal`.
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: a6df1bba7b1f2cda4593654c15d168f25b7134b2
## Description
As per [APG-113](https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/APG-113), we
would like to remove the separate concept of supergraphs. This is the
first step: we allow the supergraph config to appear in subgraphs. The
next step will be to remove the non-subgraph version of it.
This PR updates the subgraph enum type to allow for supergraph config
objects, but does nothing else. This means it should be a no-op for
current users, but will be forward-compatible with the eventual goal of
the epic. We also throw in a makeshift test framework that we can
probably replace with Insta at a later date.
<!--
Questions to consider answering:
1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
5. Does the PR have limitations?
6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->
## Changelog
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [x] community-edition
- [x] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [ ] enhancement
- [ ] bugfix
- [x] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Supergraph configuration (`CompatibilityConfig`, `AuthConfig`, and
`GraphqlConfig`) may now be defined in any subgraph. Note that
supergraph configuration may still only be defined once for any given
supergraph.
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
[APG-113]:
https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/APG-113?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: a1b9911c4abb332fe37914efd1c3afbbd554a5d0
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
The new `BooleanExpressionType` for objects is not tied to a single data
connector. As we'll be attempting to compile both input kinds into the
same resolved metadata types, let's make sure we depend on this
information as little as possible.
Mostly this is absolutely fine, the only time we now use this
information (other than still checking it for user errors) is when
juggling relationships when generating GraphQL schema items for a
boolean expression. We will have to cross this bridge when we come to
it.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 9550217e253fb71df09251928ab9b30750617c9e
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
Resolves https://hasurahq.atlassian.net/browse/V3ENGINE-124
Deduplicates `resolve_model_predicate` and
`resolve_model_predicate_with_type`, making the former call the latter.
Fixed now because this was making new boolean expression type changes
harder.
Doing so revealed and fixed a bug in predicate relationships (since
we're using the same code for everything, suddenly there were a lot of
failing tests).
<!--
Questions to consider answering:
1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
5. Does the PR have limitations?
6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->
## Changelog
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [x] community-edition
- [x] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [ ] enhancement
- [X] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Fix relationships between predicates
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 4adfdbdb544062548d4664067bf8c3ac53e51d52
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
Previously we resolved `DataConnectors` and then later resolved scalar
type representations and bundled them together. That's making
`BooleanExpressionType` stuff harder, so let's separate them.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 23a70b802b3f4b5ba9f25369491b794707265445
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
We have a formatting check job but it was not a required check so it got
missed, this fixes everything and will make the check required in
Github. Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 514478f2a48482ca34a860fedcfe6185b29c1dc3
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
We have a new `BooleanExpressionType` metadata kind. This adds it, tests
it can be parsed, but hides it from generated metadata and throws an
error if one is actually used in the engine.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 036b5fd9c32475d1c5a5e5e6321fb736fe6caefa
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
This adds the smallest possible changes to allow the use of different
options when resolving metadata. The concrete idea is this:
- each crate (`metadata-resolve`, `schema` etc) will have a type for
their flags (if any), but don't care where they come from
- when we need to expose these experimental features through the engine
(ie, to test requests in e2e tests or something), the engine will parse
an env var such as
`EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES=allow_boolean_expression_types` and then use it
to construct `MetadataResolveFlags`, `SchemaFlags`, etc.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 64ac66569f4e31829a9117c64d2e0e265d7a7303
Bumps [serde](https://github.com/serde-rs/serde) from 1.0.201 to
1.0.202.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/releases">serde's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v1.0.202</h2>
<ul>
<li>Provide public access to RenameAllRules in serde_derive_internals
(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2743">#2743</a>)</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="9e32a40b1c"><code>9e32a40</code></a>
Release 1.0.202</li>
<li><a
href="87f635e54d"><code>87f635e</code></a>
Release serde_derive_internals 0.29.1</li>
<li><a
href="d4b2dfbde2"><code>d4b2dfb</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2743">#2743</a>
from dtolnay/renameallrules</li>
<li><a
href="f6ab0bc56f"><code>f6ab0bc</code></a>
Provide public access to RenameAllRules in serde_derive_internals</li>
<li><a
href="48cc2a6327"><code>48cc2a6</code></a>
Replace use of a syn From impl</li>
<li><a
href="3202a6858a"><code>3202a68</code></a>
Skip rerunning build script on library code changes</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/compare/v1.0.201...v1.0.202">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: f6b8f6681b607a89712676456bd688a4b3cb89c3
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
There is soon to be an actual `boolean_expressions` stage so let's make
this other one clearly separate. Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: c7cbcf10dfa68bac9ba70394566b4e89f82e7742
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
In future we won't have `data_connector_object_type` available in
boolean expressions, so let's stop our dependency on it.
Also includes a couple of quality of life changes to make dealing with
NDC schema responses easier (we put them into `BTreeMap`s keyed by their
`FunctionName`, `ProcedureName`, etc.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 6d265969363fa676b24f5e78ce3f8b5dde399251
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
We're adding some tests that compare the output of metadata resolve.
Unfortunately, the results are nondeterministic because we use `HashMap`
/ `HashSet` in a lot of places. This replaces those uses with `BTreeMap`
and `BTreeSet` in `metadata-resolve`, and in a few places in `schema`
that rely on those types.
Some light reading around suggests that as well as giving us consistent
ordering, `BTree-` versions are better in terms of memory usage, esp
with < 1000 items (which I'm pretty sure most metadata items are)
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/xbkuc7/btreemap_vs_hashmap/https://users.rust-lang.org/t/hashmap-vs-btreemap/13804/2https://iq.opengenus.org/hashmap-and-btreemap-rust/
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: dbf49aefef0cd7084a3a37ef4fe9fc61257e1305
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
There is about to be a separate thing called `boolean_expression_type`,
so let's have a nice time and make the two things explicitly different.
Functional no-op.
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 0035e39a2ca8657a6ded5d5f0a4f284c3e72126d
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
When trying to reproduce a remote relationships bug, I managed to find
this bug where remote relationships to commands ignore the argument
mappings. A command argument can be called one thing in the NDC itself
(ie, `id`), but we might want to expose it as `actor_id` in the engine
as that's nicer for the user. As we referred to everything with
`String`, we did not convert back to the NDC argument name when sending
information from a remote relationship, this PR fixes that.
We also add a `ConnectorArgumentName` newtype which replaces a bunch of
uses of `String`, and would have guided us towards not creating this bug
in the first place.
<!--
Questions to consider answering:
1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
5. Does the PR have limitations?
6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->
## Changelog
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [X] community-edition
- [X] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [ ] enhancement
- [X] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Fix to correctly use argument mappings when resolving remote
relationships to commands.
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 2219e50d6cb28456e60c6794dc163d9b90573f8e
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->
## Description
We have a separate copy of the code for resolving type predicates that
we use for object types (when resolving BooleanExpressions), because the
previous code was heavily tied to the Model it used. We'd like to unify
that code again, so the first step is re-implementing relationships in
`resolve_model_predicate_with_type`.
<!--
Questions to consider answering:
1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
5. Does the PR have limitations?
6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->
## Changelog
- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
`no-changelog-required` label to the PR.
### Product
_(Select all products this will be available in)_
- [X] community-edition
- [X] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Type
<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->
_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_
- [ ] highlight
- [X] enhancement
- [ ] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
### Changelog entry
<!--
- Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
- For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
- Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->
Allow boolean expressions to use relationships
<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 6225a4ab752b71df3cdfd0982bf2107ca39f4940
