Commit Graph

58 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Vamshi Surabhi
e8e4f30dd6 server: support remote relationships on SQL Server and BigQuery (#1497)
Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST.

This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible).

The approach now changes to this:

1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed.

1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary.

1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response.

### Known issues

1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR.

1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR.

1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins.

1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST.

1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code.

### Notes to the reviewers

I think it is best reviewed commit by commit.

1. The first one is very straight forward.

1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality.  This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module.  Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore

1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor

1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server.

https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497

GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
2021-06-11 03:27:39 +00:00
Swann Moreau
d3611af58d server: lazy event catalog initialisation
event catalog:
- `hdb_catalog` is no longer automatically created
- catalog is initialised when the first event trigger is created
- catalog initialisation is done during the schema cache build, using `ArrowCache` so it is only run in response to a change to the set of event triggers

event queue:
- `processEventQueue` thread is prevented from starting when `HASURA_GRAPHQL_EVENTS_FETCH_INTERVAL=0`
- `processEventQueue` thread only processes sources for which at least one event trigger exists in some table in the source

Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <616387+ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 73f256465d62490cd2b59dcd074718679993d4fe
2021-05-25 06:51:03 +00:00
Abby Sassel
1afa4ac3cc server/citus: feature branch
Co-authored-by: Vladimir Ciobanu <1017953+vladciobanu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ikechukwu Eze <22247592+iykekings@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Philip Lykke Carlsen <358550+plcplc@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Phil Freeman <630306+paf31@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 1b964fe5f5f50380172cb702b6a328fed782b6b7
2021-05-21 02:47:51 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
2152911e24 server: introduce Hasura.Base (take 2)
GitOrigin-RevId: 0dd10f1ccd338b1cf382ebff59b6ee7f209d39a1
2021-05-11 15:19:33 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
ba70ca427a server: switch to a sub-backend approach
GitOrigin-RevId: 660126d5f65620fb58a3ffcbed564e9e35f59938
2021-04-21 21:45:32 +00:00
Karthikeyan Chinnakonda
d09b00040f server: V2 maintenance mode fixes
GitOrigin-RevId: dcd69fb217a4e976523f1bc8e7b2693111091002
2021-04-21 10:56:13 +00:00
Karthikeyan Chinnakonda
58cf521c62 server: support relationship column comparison with root table columns
GitOrigin-RevId: 9d9bcb82a997c1f060df5ba0726c29d934e70d71
2021-04-19 12:17:07 +00:00
Chris Done
f7a202a363 BigQuery Feature Branch
This will implement BigQuery support.

Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sibi Prabakaran <737477+psibi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aniket Deshpande <922486+aniketd@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vamshi Surabhi <6562944+0x777@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 1a6ffaf34233e13e8125a5c908eaa7e32d65007b
2021-04-12 10:19:20 +00:00