Commit Graph

108 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Daniel Harvey
35c58f0000 Use argument_mapping when resolving remote relationships to commands (#557)
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->

## Description

When trying to reproduce a remote relationships bug, I managed to find
this bug where remote relationships to commands ignore the argument
mappings. A command argument can be called one thing in the NDC itself
(ie, `id`), but we might want to expose it as `actor_id` in the engine
as that's nicer for the user. As we referred to everything with
`String`, we did not convert back to the NDC argument name when sending
information from a remote relationship, this PR fixes that.

We also add a `ConnectorArgumentName` newtype which replaces a bunch of
uses of `String`, and would have guided us towards not creating this bug
in the first place.

<!--
  Questions to consider answering:
  1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
  3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
  4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
  5. Does the PR have limitations?
  6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->

## Changelog

- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
  in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
  `no-changelog-required` label to the PR.

### Product

_(Select all products this will be available in)_

- [X] community-edition
- [X] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->

### Type

<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->

_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_

- [ ] highlight
- [ ] enhancement
- [X] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->

### Changelog entry

<!--
  - Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
  - For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
  - Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->

Fix to correctly use argument mappings when resolving remote
relationships to commands.

<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->

<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->

V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 2219e50d6cb28456e60c6794dc163d9b90573f8e
2024-05-10 12:28:15 +00:00
Daniel Harvey
c5151fb3cb Resolve relationships in type predicates (#536)
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->

## Description

We have a separate copy of the code for resolving type predicates that
we use for object types (when resolving BooleanExpressions), because the
previous code was heavily tied to the Model it used. We'd like to unify
that code again, so the first step is re-implementing relationships in
`resolve_model_predicate_with_type`.

<!--
  Questions to consider answering:
  1. What user-facing changes are being made?
2. What are issues related to this PR? (Consider adding `(close
#<issue-no>)` to the PR title)
  3. What is the conceptual design behind this PR?
  4. How can this PR be tested/verified?
  5. Does the PR have limitations?
  6. Does the PR introduce breaking changes?
-->

## Changelog

- Add a changelog entry (in the "Changelog entry" section below) if the
changes
  in this PR have any user-facing impact. See
[changelog
guide](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide).
- If no changelog is required ignore/remove this section and add a
  `no-changelog-required` label to the PR.

### Product

_(Select all products this will be available in)_

- [X] community-edition
- [X] cloud
<!-- product : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->

### Type

<!-- See changelog structure:
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/wiki/Changelog-Guide#structure-of-our-changelog
-->

_(Select only one. In case of multiple, choose the most appropriate)_

- [ ] highlight
- [X] enhancement
- [ ] bugfix
- [ ] behaviour-change
- [ ] performance-enhancement
- [ ] security-fix
<!-- type : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->

### Changelog entry

<!--
  - Add a user understandable changelog entry
- Include all details needed to understand the change. Try including
links to docs or issues if relevant
  - For Highlights start with a H4 heading (#### <entry title>)
  - Get the changelog entry reviewed by your team
-->

Allow boolean expressions to use relationships

<!-- changelog-entry : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->

<!-- changelog : end : DO NOT REMOVE -->

V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 6225a4ab752b71df3cdfd0982bf2107ca39f4940
2024-05-10 12:27:55 +00:00
dependabot[bot]
882b907235 Bump serde_json from 1.0.115 to 1.0.116 (#553)
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 8ca39537cca63e86b1a350f484c351093418467f
2024-05-10 12:27:34 +00:00
Daniel Harvey
aae750ae92 Remove Option from ModelWithPermissions (#529)
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->

## Description

Much as per https://github.com/hasura/v3-engine/pull/524 for
`CommandWithPermission`, this removes the `Option` from
`ModelWithPermissions`. Again, select permissions are opt-in, so
`Some(HashMap::new())` is the same as `None`, so we can remove this
layer of indirection, which I believe was only there because we were
building up the `Model` type incrementally.

Functional no-op.

V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: fcb6479f32b001380ae24db6439e96339a868692
2024-05-03 13:20:31 +00:00
Gil Mizrahi
66990c0d91 use a newtype for data connector object type (#542)
## Description

Introduce a newtype for data connector object type for the added
context.

V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: b499d3a9cd2610fec05a4bc2e1b3cf522f198b9c
2024-05-03 09:33:15 +00:00
Samir Talwar
20514ab580 Remove unused Display implementations and fix a broken one. (#545)
There were multiple locations where we were implementing
`derive_more::Display` with a fixed format string, mostly of
`"Display"`. This means that the `to_string` implementations of those
types would just return `"Display"`, which is quite unhelpful.

In all cases but one, I was simply able to remove the implementation.

In the last case, `QualifiedTypeReference` had a broken implementation.
I replaced it with something more meaningful: the type name, followed by
a `"!"` if the type is non-nullable. `derive_more` was unable to help me
here so I implemented it the old-fashioned way. (I think replacing it
with an `enum` could also work.)

V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: 35cf573d1efab2bba0707b248ae8b74bd535d0ed
2024-05-02 13:59:36 +00:00
Gil Mizrahi
690711ea1e add some code comments to resolved stage (#537)
## Description

Checking my understanding by documenting some stuff. Today it is
resolved/graphql_config, which lets us change the names of hasura
features in the syntax of the graphql.

---------

Co-authored-by: Daniel Harvey <danieljamesharvey@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Samir Talwar <samir.talwar@hasura.io>
V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: a7053e610a1f310dfc9bab2a31e79e7b0e5110c3
2024-05-02 13:35:17 +00:00
Daniel Harvey
11240e2bff Split metadata-resolve into own crate (#543)
<!-- Thank you for submitting this PR! :) -->

## Description

Now that metadata resolve has a clear interface with the rest of the
engine, let's take it out into it's own crate. This will make it easier
to maintain a strong boundary between things.

To simplify imports etc, removed nested layers of modules, so now we
import `use metadata_resolve::Qualified` instead of `use
crate::metadata::resolved::Qualified`.

The changes in `engine` crate are all just updating imports.

Functional no-op.

V3_GIT_ORIGIN_REV_ID: fb94304f7ed8883287c18bd6870045dfd69e3fe3
2024-05-02 12:29:22 +00:00