`test-server.sh` is largely concerned with running the python test suite in `server/tests-py`.
However, there are two odd test sets in there which don't belong, and make `test-server.sh`
awkward to work with.
One is `haskell-tests` (the "postgres" part of server unit tests), which we're not touching here.
The other is `test-server-flags`, which runs some shell script based tests against the command
line interface.
This commit moves `test-server-flags` out of `test-server.sh`, and into a separate buildkite step.
Reasons are largely:
- it doesn't belong with the python tests
- it doesn't need to run against various backends
The larger scope within which I'd place this change is that we
should aim to move the logic that's in test-server.sh to live closer
to server/tests-py and be shared between the local dev setup and
CI. There shouldn't be this much logic in CI scripts at all
(choosing with what flags to run graphql-engine, choosing which
arguments to pass to pytest, etc.).
This change hardly gets us there, but the way that test-server.sh
mixes concerns is one obstacle in ever getting away from the
current state.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3300
GitOrigin-RevId: a15300a1dd276fa9f0cc29ddbf4ba7497919a6ec
>
High-Level TODO:
* [x] Code Changes
* [x] Tests
* [x] Check that pro/multitenant build ok
* [x] Documentation Changes
* [x] Updating this PR with full details
* [ ] Reviews
* [ ] Ensure code has all FIXMEs and TODOs addressed
* [x] Ensure no files are checked in mistakenly
* [x] Consider impact on console, cli, etc.
### Description
>
This PR adds support for adding set-cookie header on the response from the auth webhook. If the set-cookie header is sent by the webhook, it will be forwarded in the graphQL engine response.
Fixes a bug in test-server.sh: testing of get-webhook tests was done by POST method and vice versa. To fix, the parameters were swapped.
### Changelog
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR.
### Affected components
- [x] Server
- [ ] Console
- [ ] CLI
- [x] Docs
- [ ] Community Content
- [ ] Build System
- [x] Tests
- [ ] Other (list it)
### Related Issues
->
Closes [#2269](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/2269)
### Solution and Design
>
### Steps to test and verify
>
Please refer to the docs to see how to send the set-cookie header from webhook.
### Limitations, known bugs & workarounds
>
- Support for only set-cookie header forwarding is added
- the value forwarded in the set-cookie header cannot be validated completely, the [Cookie](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/cookie) package has been used to parse the header value and any unnecessary information is stripped off before forwarding the header. The standard given in [RFC6265](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6265) has been followed for the Set-Cookie format.
### Server checklist
#### Catalog upgrade
Does this PR change Hasura Catalog version?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] Updated docs with SQL for downgrading the catalog
#### Metadata
Does this PR add a new Metadata feature?
- [x] No
#### GraphQL
- [x] No new GraphQL schema is generated
- [ ] New GraphQL schema is being generated:
- [ ] New types and typenames are correlated
#### Breaking changes
- [x] No Breaking changes
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2538
Co-authored-by: Robert <132113+robx@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: d9047e997dd221b7ce4fef51911c3694037e7c3f
fixes#3868
docker image - `hasura/graphql-engine:inherited-roles-preview-48b73a2de`
Note:
To be able to use the inherited roles feature, the graphql-engine should be started with the env variable `HASURA_GRAPHQL_EXPERIMENTAL_FEATURES` set to `inherited_roles`.
Introduction
------------
This PR implements the idea of multiple roles as presented in this [paper](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/FGALanguageICDE07.pdf). The multiple roles feature in this PR can be used via inherited roles. An inherited role is a role which can be created by combining multiple singular roles. For example, if there are two roles `author` and `editor` configured in the graphql-engine, then we can create a inherited role with the name of `combined_author_editor` role which will combine the select permissions of the `author` and `editor` roles and then make GraphQL queries using the `combined_author_editor`.
How are select permissions of different roles are combined?
------------------------------------------------------------
A select permission includes 5 things:
1. Columns accessible to the role
2. Row selection filter
3. Limit
4. Allow aggregation
5. Scalar computed fields accessible to the role
Suppose there are two roles, `role1` gives access to the `address` column with row filter `P1` and `role2` gives access to both the `address` and the `phone` column with row filter `P2` and we create a new role `combined_roles` which combines `role1` and `role2`.
Let's say the following GraphQL query is queried with the `combined_roles` role.
```graphql
query {
employees {
address
phone
}
}
```
This will translate to the following SQL query:
```sql
select
(case when (P1 or P2) then address else null end) as address,
(case when P2 then phone else null end) as phone
from employee
where (P1 or P2)
```
The other parameters of the select permission will be combined in the following manner:
1. Limit - Minimum of the limits will be the limit of the inherited role
2. Allow aggregations - If any of the role allows aggregation, then the inherited role will allow aggregation
3. Scalar computed fields - same as table column fields, as in the above example
APIs for inherited roles:
----------------------
1. `add_inherited_role`
`add_inherited_role` is the [metadata API](https://hasura.io/docs/1.0/graphql/core/api-reference/index.html#schema-metadata-api) to create a new inherited role. It accepts two arguments
`role_name`: the name of the inherited role to be added (String)
`role_set`: list of roles that need to be combined (Array of Strings)
Example:
```json
{
"type": "add_inherited_role",
"args": {
"role_name":"combined_user",
"role_set":[
"user",
"user1"
]
}
}
```
After adding the inherited role, the inherited role can be used like single roles like earlier
Note:
An inherited role can only be created with non-inherited/singular roles.
2. `drop_inherited_role`
The `drop_inherited_role` API accepts the name of the inherited role and drops it from the metadata. It accepts a single argument:
`role_name`: name of the inherited role to be dropped
Example:
```json
{
"type": "drop_inherited_role",
"args": {
"role_name":"combined_user"
}
}
```
Metadata
---------
The derived roles metadata will be included under the `experimental_features` key while exporting the metadata.
```json
{
"experimental_features": {
"derived_roles": [
{
"role_name": "manager_is_employee_too",
"role_set": [
"employee",
"manager"
]
}
]
}
}
```
Scope
------
Only postgres queries and subscriptions are supported in this PR.
Important points:
-----------------
1. All columns exposed to an inherited role will be marked as `nullable`, this is done so that cell value nullification can be done.
TODOs
-------
- [ ] Tests
- [ ] Test a GraphQL query running with a inherited role without enabling inherited roles in experimental features
- [] Tests for aggregate queries, limit, computed fields, functions, subscriptions (?)
- [ ] Introspection test with a inherited role (nullability changes in a inherited role)
- [ ] Docs
- [ ] Changelog
Co-authored-by: Vamshi Surabhi <6562944+0x777@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 3b8ee1e11f5ceca80fe294f8c074d42fbccfec63
