-- | This module implements two parts of the GraphQL specification: -- -- 1. <§ 5.3.2 Field Selection Merging http://spec.graphql.org/June2018/#sec-Field-Selection-Merging> -- 2. <§ 6.3.2 Field Collection http://spec.graphql.org/June2018/#sec-Field-Collection> -- -- These are described in completely different sections of the specification, but -- they’re actually highly related: both essentially normalize fields in a -- selection set. module Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Collect ( collectFields, ) where import Control.Monad (foldM, unless) import Data.HashMap.Strict.InsOrd (InsOrdHashMap) import Data.HashMap.Strict.InsOrd qualified as OMap import Data.Maybe (fromMaybe) import Data.Text.Extended import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Class import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Directives import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Variable import Language.GraphQL.Draft.Syntax import Prelude -- | Collects the effective set of fields queried by a selection set by -- flattening fragments and merging duplicate fields. collectFields :: (MonadParse m, Foldable t) => -- | The names of the object types and interface types the 'SelectionSet' is -- selecting against. t Name -> SelectionSet NoFragments Variable -> m (InsOrdHashMap Name (Field NoFragments Variable)) collectFields objectTypeNames selectionSet = mergeFields =<< flattenSelectionSet objectTypeNames selectionSet -- | Flattens inline fragments in a selection set. For example, -- -- > { -- > bar -- > ... on Foo { -- > baz -- > qux -- > } -- > } -- -- is flattened to: -- -- > { -- > bar -- > baz -- > qux -- > } -- -- Nested fragments are similarly flattened, but only as is necessary: fragments -- inside subselection sets of individual fields are /not/ flattened. For -- example, -- -- > { -- > bar -- > ... on Foo { -- > baz { -- > ... on Baz { -- > foo -- > } -- > } -- > qux -- > } -- > } -- -- is flattened to -- -- > { -- > bar -- > baz { -- > ... on Baz { -- > foo -- > } -- > } -- > qux -- > } -- -- leaving the innermost fragment on @baz@ alone. -- -- This function also applies @\@include@ and @\@skip@ directives, since they -- should be applied before fragments are flattened. flattenSelectionSet :: (MonadParse m, Foldable t) => -- | The name of the object type the 'SelectionSet' is selecting against. t Name -> SelectionSet NoFragments Variable -> m [Field NoFragments Variable] flattenSelectionSet objectTypeNames = fmap concat . traverse flattenSelection where -- The easy case: just a single field. flattenSelection (SelectionField field) = do applyInclusionDirectives EDLFIELD (_fDirectives field) $ pure [field] -- Note: The 'SelectionFragmentSpread' case has already been eliminated by -- the fragment inliner. -- TODO: handle directives on fragment spread. -- The involved case: we have an inline fragment to process. flattenSelection (SelectionInlineFragment fragment) = do applyInclusionDirectives EDLINLINE_FRAGMENT (_ifDirectives fragment) $ case _ifTypeCondition fragment of -- No type condition, so the fragment unconditionally applies. Nothing -> flattenInlineFragment fragment Just typeName -- There is a type condition, but it is just the type of the -- selection set; the fragment trivially applies. | typeName `elem` objectTypeNames -> flattenInlineFragment fragment -- Otherwise, the fragment must not apply, because we do not currently -- support interfaces or unions. According to the GraphQL spec, it is -- an *error* to select a fragment that cannot possibly apply to the -- given type; see -- http://spec.graphql.org/June2018/#sec-Fragment-spread-is-possible. -- Therefore, we raise an error. | otherwise -> return [] {- parseError $ "illegal type condition in fragment; type " <> typeName <<> " is unrelated to any of the types " <> Text.intercalate ", " (fmap dquoteTxt (toList objectTypeNames)) -} flattenInlineFragment InlineFragment {_ifSelectionSet} = do flattenSelectionSet objectTypeNames _ifSelectionSet applyInclusionDirectives location directives continue = do dirMap <- parseDirectives inclusionDirectives (DLExecutable location) directives shouldSkip <- withDirective dirMap skip $ pure . fromMaybe False shouldInclude <- withDirective dirMap include $ pure . fromMaybe True if shouldInclude && not shouldSkip then continue else pure [] -- | Merges fields according to the rules in the GraphQL specification, specifically -- <§ 5.3.2 Field Selection Merging http://spec.graphql.org/June2018/#sec-Field-Selection-Merging>. mergeFields :: (MonadParse m, Eq var) => [Field NoFragments var] -> m (InsOrdHashMap Name (Field NoFragments var)) mergeFields = foldM addField OMap.empty where addField fields newField = case OMap.lookup alias fields of Nothing -> pure $! OMap.insert alias newField fields Just oldField -> do mergedField <- mergeField alias oldField newField pure $! OMap.insert alias mergedField fields where alias = fromMaybe (_fName newField) (_fAlias newField) mergeField alias oldField newField = do unless (_fName oldField == _fName newField) $ parseError $ "selection of both " <> _fName oldField <<> " and " <> _fName newField <<> " specify the same response name, " <>> alias unless (_fArguments oldField == _fArguments newField) $ parseError $ "inconsistent arguments between multiple selections of " <> "field " <>> _fName oldField pure $! Field { _fAlias = Just alias, _fName = _fName oldField, _fArguments = _fArguments oldField, _fDirectives = _fDirectives oldField <> _fDirectives newField, -- see Note [Lazily merge selection sets] _fSelectionSet = _fSelectionSet oldField ++ _fSelectionSet newField } {- Note [Lazily merge selection sets] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Field merging is described in a recursive way in the GraphQL spec (§ 5.3.2 Field Selection Merging http://spec.graphql.org/June2018/#sec-Field-Selection-Merging). This makes sense: if fields have sub-selection sets, they should be recursively merged. For example, suppose we have the following selection set: { field1 { field2 { field3 } field5 } field1 { field2 { field4 } field5 } } After a single level of merging, we’ll merge the two occurrences of field1 together to get: { field1 { field2 { field3 } field5 field2 { field4 } field5 } } It would be natural to then merge the inner selection set, too, yielding: { field1 { field2 { field3 field4 } field5 } } But we don’t do this. Instead, we stop after the first level of merging, so field1’s sub-selection set still has duplication. Why? Because recursively merging fields would also require recursively flattening fragments, and flattening fragments is tricky: it requires knowledge of type information. Fortunately, this lazy approach to field merging is totally okay, because we call collectFields (and therefore mergeFields) each time we parse a selection set. Once we get to processing the sub-selection set of field1, we’ll call collectFields again, and it will merge things the rest of the way. This is consistent with the way the rest of our parsing system works, where parsers interpret their own inputs on an as-needed basis. -}