mirror of
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine.git
synced 2024-12-17 04:24:35 +03:00
11a454c2d6
This commit applies ormolu to the whole Haskell code base by running `make format`. For in-flight branches, simply merging changes from `main` will result in merge conflicts. To avoid this, update your branch using the following instructions. Replace `<format-commit>` by the hash of *this* commit. $ git checkout my-feature-branch $ git merge <format-commit>^ # and resolve conflicts normally $ make format $ git commit -a -m "reformat with ormolu" $ git merge -s ours post-ormolu https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2404 GitOrigin-RevId: 75049f5c12f430c615eafb4c6b8e83e371e01c8e
232 lines
7.6 KiB
Haskell
232 lines
7.6 KiB
Haskell
-- | This module implements two parts of the GraphQL specification:
|
||
--
|
||
-- 1. <§ 5.3.2 Field Selection Merging http://spec.graphql.org/June2018/#sec-Field-Selection-Merging>
|
||
-- 2. <§ 6.3.2 Field Collection http://spec.graphql.org/June2018/#sec-Field-Collection>
|
||
--
|
||
-- These are described in completely different sections of the specification, but
|
||
-- they’re actually highly related: both essentially normalize fields in a
|
||
-- selection set.
|
||
module Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Collect
|
||
( collectFields,
|
||
)
|
||
where
|
||
|
||
import Data.HashMap.Strict.InsOrd qualified as OMap
|
||
import Data.Text.Extended
|
||
import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Class
|
||
import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Directives
|
||
import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Schema
|
||
import Hasura.Prelude
|
||
import Language.GraphQL.Draft.Syntax
|
||
|
||
-- | Collects the effective set of fields queried by a selection set by
|
||
-- flattening fragments and merging duplicate fields.
|
||
collectFields ::
|
||
(MonadParse m, Foldable t) =>
|
||
-- | The names of the object types and interface types the 'SelectionSet' is
|
||
-- selecting against.
|
||
t Name ->
|
||
SelectionSet NoFragments Variable ->
|
||
m (InsOrdHashMap Name (Field NoFragments Variable))
|
||
collectFields objectTypeNames selectionSet =
|
||
mergeFields =<< flattenSelectionSet objectTypeNames selectionSet
|
||
|
||
-- | Flattens inline fragments in a selection set. For example,
|
||
--
|
||
-- > {
|
||
-- > bar
|
||
-- > ... on Foo {
|
||
-- > baz
|
||
-- > qux
|
||
-- > }
|
||
-- > }
|
||
--
|
||
-- is flattened to:
|
||
--
|
||
-- > {
|
||
-- > bar
|
||
-- > baz
|
||
-- > qux
|
||
-- > }
|
||
--
|
||
-- Nested fragments are similarly flattened, but only as is necessary: fragments
|
||
-- inside subselection sets of individual fields are /not/ flattened. For
|
||
-- example,
|
||
--
|
||
-- > {
|
||
-- > bar
|
||
-- > ... on Foo {
|
||
-- > baz {
|
||
-- > ... on Baz {
|
||
-- > foo
|
||
-- > }
|
||
-- > }
|
||
-- > qux
|
||
-- > }
|
||
-- > }
|
||
--
|
||
-- is flattened to
|
||
--
|
||
-- > {
|
||
-- > bar
|
||
-- > baz {
|
||
-- > ... on Baz {
|
||
-- > foo
|
||
-- > }
|
||
-- > }
|
||
-- > qux
|
||
-- > }
|
||
--
|
||
-- leaving the innermost fragment on @baz@ alone.
|
||
--
|
||
-- This function also applies @\@include@ and @\@skip@ directives, since they
|
||
-- should be applied before fragments are flattened.
|
||
flattenSelectionSet ::
|
||
(MonadParse m, Foldable t) =>
|
||
-- | The name of the object type the 'SelectionSet' is selecting against.
|
||
t Name ->
|
||
SelectionSet NoFragments Variable ->
|
||
m [Field NoFragments Variable]
|
||
flattenSelectionSet objectTypeNames = fmap concat . traverse flattenSelection
|
||
where
|
||
-- The easy case: just a single field.
|
||
flattenSelection (SelectionField field) = do
|
||
applyInclusionDirectives EDLFIELD (_fDirectives field) $ pure [field]
|
||
|
||
-- Note: The 'SelectionFragmentSpread' case has already been eliminated by
|
||
-- the fragment inliner.
|
||
-- TODO: handle directives on fragment spread.
|
||
|
||
-- The involved case: we have an inline fragment to process.
|
||
flattenSelection (SelectionInlineFragment fragment) = do
|
||
applyInclusionDirectives EDLINLINE_FRAGMENT (_ifDirectives fragment) $
|
||
case _ifTypeCondition fragment of
|
||
-- No type condition, so the fragment unconditionally applies.
|
||
Nothing -> flattenInlineFragment fragment
|
||
Just typeName
|
||
-- There is a type condition, but it is just the type of the
|
||
-- selection set; the fragment trivially applies.
|
||
| typeName `elem` objectTypeNames -> flattenInlineFragment fragment
|
||
-- Otherwise, the fragment must not apply, because we do not currently
|
||
-- support interfaces or unions. According to the GraphQL spec, it is
|
||
-- an *error* to select a fragment that cannot possibly apply to the
|
||
-- given type; see
|
||
-- http://spec.graphql.org/June2018/#sec-Fragment-spread-is-possible.
|
||
-- Therefore, we raise an error.
|
||
| otherwise -> return []
|
||
{- parseError $ "illegal type condition in fragment; type "
|
||
<> typeName <<> " is unrelated to any of the types " <>
|
||
Text.intercalate ", " (fmap dquoteTxt (toList objectTypeNames))
|
||
-}
|
||
|
||
flattenInlineFragment InlineFragment {_ifSelectionSet} = do
|
||
flattenSelectionSet objectTypeNames _ifSelectionSet
|
||
|
||
applyInclusionDirectives location directives continue = do
|
||
dirMap <- parseDirectives inclusionDirectives (DLExecutable location) directives
|
||
shouldSkip <- withDirective dirMap skip $ pure . fromMaybe False
|
||
shouldInclude <- withDirective dirMap include $ pure . fromMaybe True
|
||
if shouldInclude && not shouldSkip
|
||
then continue
|
||
else pure []
|
||
|
||
-- | Merges fields according to the rules in the GraphQL specification, specifically
|
||
-- <§ 5.3.2 Field Selection Merging http://spec.graphql.org/June2018/#sec-Field-Selection-Merging>.
|
||
mergeFields ::
|
||
(MonadParse m, Eq var) =>
|
||
[Field NoFragments var] ->
|
||
m (InsOrdHashMap Name (Field NoFragments var))
|
||
mergeFields = foldM addField OMap.empty
|
||
where
|
||
addField fields newField = case OMap.lookup alias fields of
|
||
Nothing ->
|
||
pure $! OMap.insert alias newField fields
|
||
Just oldField -> do
|
||
mergedField <- mergeField alias oldField newField
|
||
pure $! OMap.insert alias mergedField fields
|
||
where
|
||
alias = fromMaybe (_fName newField) (_fAlias newField)
|
||
|
||
mergeField alias oldField newField = do
|
||
unless (_fName oldField == _fName newField) $
|
||
parseError $
|
||
"selection of both " <> _fName oldField <<> " and "
|
||
<> _fName newField <<> " specify the same response name, " <>> alias
|
||
|
||
unless (_fArguments oldField == _fArguments newField) $
|
||
parseError $
|
||
"inconsistent arguments between multiple selections of "
|
||
<> "field " <>> _fName oldField
|
||
|
||
pure
|
||
$! Field
|
||
{ _fAlias = Just alias,
|
||
_fName = _fName oldField,
|
||
_fArguments = _fArguments oldField,
|
||
_fDirectives = _fDirectives oldField <> _fDirectives newField,
|
||
-- see Note [Lazily merge selection sets]
|
||
_fSelectionSet = _fSelectionSet oldField ++ _fSelectionSet newField
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
{- Note [Lazily merge selection sets]
|
||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
Field merging is described in a recursive way in the GraphQL spec (§ 5.3.2 Field
|
||
Selection Merging http://spec.graphql.org/June2018/#sec-Field-Selection-Merging).
|
||
This makes sense: if fields have sub-selection sets, they should be recursively
|
||
merged. For example, suppose we have the following selection set:
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
field1 {
|
||
field2 {
|
||
field3
|
||
}
|
||
field5
|
||
}
|
||
field1 {
|
||
field2 {
|
||
field4
|
||
}
|
||
field5
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
After a single level of merging, we’ll merge the two occurrences of field1
|
||
together to get:
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
field1 {
|
||
field2 {
|
||
field3
|
||
}
|
||
field5
|
||
field2 {
|
||
field4
|
||
}
|
||
field5
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
It would be natural to then merge the inner selection set, too, yielding:
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
field1 {
|
||
field2 {
|
||
field3
|
||
field4
|
||
}
|
||
field5
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
But we don’t do this. Instead, we stop after the first level of merging, so
|
||
field1’s sub-selection set still has duplication. Why? Because recursively
|
||
merging fields would also require recursively flattening fragments, and
|
||
flattening fragments is tricky: it requires knowledge of type information.
|
||
|
||
Fortunately, this lazy approach to field merging is totally okay, because we
|
||
call collectFields (and therefore mergeFields) each time we parse a selection
|
||
set. Once we get to processing the sub-selection set of field1, we’ll call
|
||
collectFields again, and it will merge things the rest of the way. This is
|
||
consistent with the way the rest of our parsing system works, where parsers
|
||
interpret their own inputs on an as-needed basis. -}
|