graphql-engine/server/src-lib/Hasura/GraphQL/Parser/Class.hs
hasura-bot 98ccd81704 Server: Remote relationships permissions
GITHUB_PR_NUMBER: 6125
GITHUB_PR_URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/pull/6125

Co-authored-by: Karthikeyan Chinnakonda <15602904+codingkarthik@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 53d0671e6335dad1af7cb00e3e05e7021a910673
2021-01-19 20:57:58 +00:00

166 lines
6.7 KiB
Haskell
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

-- | Classes for monads used during schema construction and query parsing.
module Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Class
( MonadParse(..)
, parseError
, QueryReusability(..)
, module Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Class
) where
import Hasura.Prelude
import qualified Data.HashMap.Strict as Map
import qualified Language.Haskell.TH as TH
import Data.Has
import Data.Text.Extended
import Data.Tuple.Extended
import GHC.Stack (HasCallStack)
import Type.Reflection (Typeable)
import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Class.Parse
import Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Internal.Types
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Common
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Error
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Source
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Table
import Hasura.Session (RoleName)
{- Note [Tying the knot]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GraphQL type definitions can be mutually recursive, and indeed, they quite often
are! For example, two tables that reference one another will be represented by
types such as the following:
type author {
id: Int!
name: String!
articles: [article!]!
}
type article {
id: Int!
title: String!
content: String!
author: author!
}
This doesnt cause any trouble if the schema is represented by a mapping from
type names to type definitions, but the Parser abstraction is all about avoiding
that kind of indirection to improve type safety — parsers refer to their
sub-parsers directly. This presents two problems during schema generation:
1. Schema generation needs to terminate in finite time, so we need to ensure
we dont try to eagerly construct an infinitely-large schema due to the
mutually-recursive structure.
2. To serve introspection queries, we do eventually need to construct a
mapping from names to types (a TypeMap), so we need to be able to
recursively walk the entire schema in finite time.
Solving point number 1 could be done with either laziness or sharing, but
neither of those are enough to solve point number 2, which requires /observable/
sharing. We need to construct a Parser graph that contains enough information to
detect cycles during traversal.
It may seem appealing to just use type names to detect cycles, which would allow
us to get away with using laziness rather than true sharing. Unfortunately, that
leads to two further problems:
* Its possible to end up with two different types with the same name, which
is an error and should be reported as such. Using names to break cycles
prevents us from doing that, since we have no way to check that two types
with the same name are actually the same.
* Some Parser constructors can fail — the `column` parser checks that the type
name is a valid GraphQL name, for example. This extra validation means lazy
schema construction isnt viable, since we need to eagerly build the schema
to ensure all the validation checks hold.
So were forced to use sharing. But how do we do it? Somehow, we have to /tie
the knot/ — we have to build a cyclic data structure — and some of the cycles
may be quite large. Doing all this knot-tying by hand would be incredibly
tricky, and it would require a lot of inversion of control to thread the shared
parsers around.
To avoid contorting the program, we instead implement a form of memoization. The
MonadSchema class provides a mechanism to memoize a parser constructor function,
which allows us to get sharing mostly for free. The memoization strategy also
annotates cached parsers with a Unique that can be used to break cycles while
traversing the graph, so we get observable sharing as well. -}
-- | A class that provides functionality used when building the GraphQL schema,
-- i.e. constructing the 'Parser' graph.
class (Monad m, MonadParse n) => MonadSchema n m | m -> n where
-- | Memoizes a parser constructor function for the extent of a single schema
-- construction process. This is mostly useful for recursive parsers;
-- see Note [Tying the knot] for more details.
memoizeOn
:: (HasCallStack, Ord a, Typeable a, Typeable b, Typeable k)
=> TH.Name
-- ^ A unique name used to identify the function being memoized. There isnt
-- really any metaprogramming going on here, we just use a Template Haskell
-- 'TH.Name' as a convenient source for a static, unique identifier.
-> a
-- ^ The value to use as the memoization key. Its the callers
-- responsibility to ensure multiple calls to the same function dont use
-- the same key.
-> m (Parser k n b) -> m (Parser k n b)
type MonadRole r m = (MonadReader r m, Has RoleName r)
-- | Gets the current role the schema is being built for.
askRoleName
:: MonadRole r m
=> m RoleName
askRoleName = asks getter
type MonadTableInfo b r m = (MonadReader r m, Has (SourceCache b) r, MonadError QErr m)
-- | Looks up table information for the given table name. This function
-- should never fail, since the schema cache construction process is
-- supposed to ensure all dependencies are resolved.
askTableInfo
:: forall b r m. (Backend b, MonadTableInfo b r m)
=> TableName b
-> m (TableInfo b)
askTableInfo tableName = do
let getTableInfo :: SourceCache b -> Maybe (TableInfo b)
getTableInfo sc = Map.lookup tableName $ Map.unions $ map _pcTables $ Map.elems sc
tableInfo <- asks $ getTableInfo . getter
-- This should never fail, since the schema cache construction process is
-- supposed to ensure that all dependencies are resolved.
tableInfo `onNothing` throw500 ("askTableInfo: no info for " <>> tableName)
-- | A wrapper around 'memoizeOn' that memoizes a function by using its argument
-- as the key.
memoize
:: (HasCallStack, MonadSchema n m, Ord a, Typeable a, Typeable b, Typeable k)
=> TH.Name
-> (a -> m (Parser k n b))
-> (a -> m (Parser k n b))
memoize name f a = memoizeOn name a (f a)
memoize2
:: (HasCallStack, MonadSchema n m, Ord a, Ord b, Typeable a, Typeable b, Typeable c, Typeable k)
=> TH.Name
-> (a -> b -> m (Parser k n c))
-> (a -> b -> m (Parser k n c))
memoize2 name = curry . memoize name . uncurry
memoize3
:: ( HasCallStack, MonadSchema n m, Ord a, Ord b, Ord c
, Typeable a, Typeable b, Typeable c, Typeable d, Typeable k )
=> TH.Name
-> (a -> b -> c -> m (Parser k n d))
-> (a -> b -> c -> m (Parser k n d))
memoize3 name = curry3 . memoize name . uncurry3
memoize4
:: ( HasCallStack, MonadSchema n m, Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d
, Typeable a, Typeable b, Typeable c, Typeable d, Typeable e, Typeable k )
=> TH.Name
-> (a -> b -> c -> d -> m (Parser k n e))
-> (a -> b -> c -> d -> m (Parser k n e))
memoize4 name = curry4 . memoize name . uncurry4