mirror of
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine.git
synced 2024-12-18 13:02:11 +03:00
2d055df2a4
A bunch of configurations are retrieved from the Metadata, then stored in the `BuildOutputs` structure, only to then be forwarded to the `SchemaCache`, with extremely little processing in between. So this simplifies the build pipeline for some parts of the metadata: just construct those things from `Metadata` directly, and store them in the `SchemaCache` without any intermediate container. Why did we have the detour via `BuildOutputs` in the first place? Parts of the Metadata (codified by `MetadataObjId`) can generate _metadata inconsistencies_ and/or _schema dependencies_, which are related. - Metadata inconsistencies are warnings that we show to the user, indicating that there's something wrong with their configuration, and they have to fix it. - Schema dependencies are an internal mechanism that allow us to build a consistent view of the world. For instance, if we have a relationship from DB tables `books` to `authors`, but the `authors` table is inconsistent (e.g. it doesn't exist in the DB), then we have schema dependencies indicating that. The job of `resolveDependencies` is to then drop the relationship, so that we can at least generate a legal GraphQL schema for `books`. If we never generate a schema dependency for a certain fragment of Metadata, then there is no reason to call `resolveDependencies` on it, and so there is no reason to store it in `BuildOutputs`. --- The starting point that allows this refactor is to apply Metadata defaults before it reaches `buildAndCollectInfo`, so that metadata-with-defaults can be used elsewhere. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6609 GitOrigin-RevId: df0c4a7ff9451e10e02a40bf26304b26584ba483 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Autodocodec | ||
| Control | ||
| Data | ||
| Database/MSSQL | ||
| GHC | ||
| Hasura | ||
| Net | ||
| Network | ||