From c716fb102a2fe983a571568ccd61ad1fd5adc711 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: vaxerski <43317083+vaxerski@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:15:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] clarify enforcement outside consensus

---
 CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md b/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
index bc4ccd51..79e6bf38 100644
--- a/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
+++ b/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
@@ -60,6 +60,13 @@ Depending on the severity of the infraction, any action from the list below may
 Please keep in mind cases are reviewed on a per-case basis and members are the ultimate
 deciding factor in the type of punishment.
 
+If the matter would benefit from an outside consensus, a member might reach for more opinions
+from people unrelated to the organization, however, the final decision regarding the action
+to be taken is still up to the member.
+
+For example, if the matter at hand regards a representative of a marginalized group or minority,
+the member might ask for a first-hand opinion from another representative of such group.
+
 ### Correction/Edit
 
 If your message is found to be misleading or poorly worded, a member might