[ papers ] Tychonoff (Part I) (#2332)

This commit is contained in:
G. Allais 2022-02-24 11:12:53 +00:00 committed by GitHub
parent 8ffad8878f
commit 1011cc6162
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
6 changed files with 666 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -4,18 +4,54 @@ import Decidable.Equality
%default total
namespace Pair
||| Constructive choice: a function producing pairs of a value and a proof
||| can be split into a function producing a value and a family of proofs
||| for the images of that function.
public export
choice :
{0 p : a -> b -> Type} ->
((x : a) -> (b ** p x b)) ->
(f : (a -> b) ** (x : a) -> p x (f x))
choice pr = ((\ x => fst (pr x)) ** \ x => snd (pr x))
namespace DPair
||| Constructive choice: a function producing pairs of a value and a proof
||| can be split into a function producing a value and a family of proofs
||| for the images of that function.
public export
curry : {0 p : a -> Type} -> ((x : a ** p x) -> c) -> (x : a) -> p x -> c
choice :
{0 b : a -> Type} ->
{0 p : (x : a) -> b x -> Type} ->
((x : a) -> (y : b x ** p x y)) ->
(f : ((x : a) -> b x) ** (x : a) -> p x (f x))
choice pr = ((\ x => fst (pr x)) ** \ x => snd (pr x))
||| A function taking a pair of a value and a proof as an argument can be turned
||| into a function taking a value and a proof as two separate arguments.
||| Use `uncurry` to go in the other direction
public export
curry : {0 p : a -> Type} -> ((x : a ** p x) -> c) -> ((x : a) -> p x -> c)
curry f x y = f (x ** y)
||| A function taking a value and a proof as two separates arguments can be turned
||| into a function taking a pair of that value and its proof as a single argument.
||| Use `curry` to go in the other direction.
public export
uncurry : {0 p : a -> Type} -> ((x : a) -> p x -> c) -> (x : a ** p x) -> c
uncurry : {0 p : a -> Type} -> ((x : a) -> p x -> c) -> ((x : a ** p x) -> c)
uncurry f s = f s.fst s.snd
||| Given a function on values and a family of proofs that this function takes
||| p-respecting inputs to q-respecting outputs,
||| we can turn: a pair of a value and a proof it is p-respecting
||| into: a pair of a value and a proof it is q-respecting
public export
bimap : {0 p : a -> Type} -> {0 q : b -> Type} -> (f : a -> b) -> (forall x. p x -> q (f x)) -> (x : a ** p x) -> (y : b ** q y)
bimap : {0 p : a -> Type} -> {0 q : b -> Type} ->
(f : a -> b) ->
(prf : forall x. p x -> q (f x)) ->
(x : a ** p x) -> (y : b ** q y)
bimap f g (x ** y) = (f x ** g y)
public export

View File

@ -28,6 +28,34 @@ public export
decideLTE : (n : Nat) -> (m : Nat) -> Dec (LTE n m)
decideLTE = isLTE
||| If a predicate is decidable then we can decide whether it holds on
||| a bounded domain.
public export
decideLTBounded :
{0 p : Nat -> Type} ->
((n : Nat) -> Dec (p n)) ->
(n : Nat) -> Dec ((k : Nat) -> k `LT` n -> p k)
decideLTBounded pdec 0 = Yes (\ k, bnd => absurd bnd)
decideLTBounded pdec (S n) with (pdec 0)
_ | No np0 = No (\ prf => np0 (prf 0 (LTESucc LTEZero)))
_ | Yes p0 with (decideLTBounded (\ n => pdec (S n)) n)
_ | No nprf = No (\ prf => nprf (\ k, bnd => prf (S k) (LTESucc bnd)))
_ | Yes prf = Yes $ \ k, bnd =>
case view bnd of
LTZero => p0
(LTSucc bnd) => prf _ bnd
||| If a predicate is decidable then we can decide whether it holds on
||| a bounded domain.
public export
decideLTEBounded :
{0 p : Nat -> Type} ->
((n : Nat) -> Dec (p n)) ->
(n : Nat) -> Dec ((k : Nat) -> k `LTE` n -> p k)
decideLTEBounded pdec n with (decideLTBounded pdec (S n))
_ | Yes prf = Yes (\ k, bnd => prf k (LTESucc bnd))
_ | No nprf = No (\ prf => nprf (\ k, bnd => prf k (fromLteSucc bnd)))
public export
Decidable 2 [Nat,Nat] LTE where
decide = decideLTE

View File

@ -0,0 +1,578 @@
||| This module is based on Todd Waugh Ambridge's blog post series
||| "Search over uniformly continuous decidable predicates on
||| infinite collections of types"
||| https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~txw467/tychonoff/
module Search.Tychonoff.PartI
import Data.DPair
import Data.Nat
import Data.Nat.Order
import Data.So
import Data.Vect
import Decidable.Equality
import Decidable.Decidable
%default total
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Searchable types
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pred : Type -> Type
Pred a = a -> Type
0 Decidable : Pred a -> Type
Decidable p = (x : a) -> Dec (p x)
||| Hilbert's epsilon is a function that for a given predicate
||| returns a value that satisfies it if any value exists that
||| that would satisfy it.
-- NB: this is not in the original posts, it's me making potentially
-- erroneous connections
0 HilbertEpsilon : Pred x -> Type
HilbertEpsilon p = (v : x ** (v0 : x) -> p v0 -> p v)
||| A type is searchable if for any
||| @ p a decidable predicate over that type
||| @ x can be found such that if there exists a
||| @ x0 satisfying p then x also satisfies p
0 IsSearchable : Type -> Type
IsSearchable x = (0 p : Pred x) -> Decidable p -> HilbertEpsilon p
infix 0 <->
record (<->) (a, b : Type) where
constructor MkIso
forwards : a -> b
backwards : b -> a
inverseL : (x : a) -> backwards (forwards x) === x
inverseR : (y : b) -> forwards (backwards y) === y
||| Searchable is closed under isomorphisms
map : (a <-> b) -> IsSearchable a -> IsSearchable b
map (MkIso f g _ inv) search p pdec =
let (xa ** prfa) = search (p . f) (\ x => pdec (f x)) in
(f xa ** \ xb, pxb => prfa (g xb) $ replace {p} (sym $ inv xb) pxb)
interface Searchable (0 a : Type) where
constructor MkSearchable
search : IsSearchable a
Inhabited : Type -> Type
Inhabited a = a
searchableIsInhabited : IsSearchable a -> Inhabited a
searchableIsInhabited search = fst (search (\ _ => ()) (\ _ => Yes ()))
-- Finite types are trivially searchable
||| Unit is searchable
Searchable () where
search p pdef = (() ** \ (), prf => prf)
||| Bool is searchable
Searchable Bool where
search p pdec = case pdec True of
-- if p True holds we're done
Yes prf => MkDPair True $ \ _, _ => prf
-- otherwise p False is our best bet
No contra => MkDPair False $ \case
False => id
True => absurd . contra
||| Searchable is closed under finite sum
-- Note that this would enable us to go back and prove Bool searchable
-- via the iso Bool <-> Either () ()
(Searchable a, Searchable b) => Searchable (Either a b) where
search p pdec =
let (xa ** prfa) = search (p . Left) (\ xa => pdec (Left xa)) in
let (xb ** prfb) = search (p . Right) (\ xb => pdec (Right xb)) in
case pdec (Left xa) of
Yes pxa => (Left xa ** \ _, _ => pxa)
No npxa => case pdec (Right xb) of
Yes pxb => (Right xb ** \ _, _ => pxb)
No npxb => MkDPair (Left xa) $ \case
Left xa' => \ pxa' => absurd (npxa (prfa xa' pxa'))
Right xb' => \ pxb' => absurd (npxb (prfb xb' pxb'))
||| Searchable is closed under finite product
(Searchable a, Searchable b) => Searchable (a, b) where
search p pdec =
-- How cool is that use of choice?
let (fb ** prfb) = Pair.choice $ \ a => search (p . (a,)) (\ b => pdec (a, b)) in
let (xa ** prfa) = search (\ a => p (a, fb a)) (\ xa => pdec (xa, fb xa)) in
MkDPair (xa, fb xa) $ \ (xa', xb'), pxab' => prfa xa' (prfb xa' xb' pxab')
||| Searchable for Vect
%hint
searchVect : Searchable a => (n : Nat) -> Searchable (Vect n a)
searchVect 0 = MkSearchable $ \ p, pdec => ([] ** \case [] => id)
searchVect (S n) = MkSearchable $ \ p, pdec =>
let %hint ih : Searchable (Vect n a)
ih = searchVect n
0 P : Pred (a, Vect n a)
P = p . Prelude.uncurry (::)
Pdec : Decidable P
Pdec = \ (x, xs) => pdec (x :: xs)
in bimap (uncurry (::)) (\ prf => \case (v0 :: vs0) => prf (v0, vs0))
$ search P Pdec
||| The usual LPO is for Nat only
0 LPO : Type -> Type
LPO a = (f : a -> Bool) ->
Either (x : a ** f x === True) ((x : a) -> f x === False)
0 LPO' : Type -> Type
LPO' a = (0 p : Pred a) -> Decidable p ->
Either (x : a ** p x) ((x : a) -> Not (p x))
SearchableIsLPO : IsSearchable a -> LPO' a
SearchableIsLPO search p pdec =
let (x ** prf) = search p pdec in
case pdec x of
Yes px => Left (x ** px)
No npx => Right (\ x', px' => absurd (npx (prf x' px')))
LPOIsSearchable : LPO' a -> Inhabited a -> IsSearchable a
LPOIsSearchable lpo inh p pdec = case lpo p pdec of
Left (x ** px) => (x ** \ _, _ => px)
Right contra => (inh ** \ x, px => absurd (contra x px))
EqUntil : (m : Nat) -> (a, b : Nat -> x) -> Type
EqUntil m a b = (k : Nat) -> k `LTE` m -> a k === b k
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Closeness functions and extended naturals
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
||| A decreasing sequence of booleans
Decreasing : (Nat -> Bool) -> Type
Decreasing f = (n : Nat) -> So (f (S n)) -> So (f n)
||| Nat extended with a point at infinity
record NatInf where
constructor MkNatInf
sequence : Nat -> Bool
isDecreasing : Decreasing sequence
repeat : x -> (Nat -> x)
repeat v = const v
Zero : NatInf
Zero = MkNatInf (repeat False) (\ n, prf => prf)
Omega : NatInf
Omega = MkNatInf (repeat True) (\ n, prf => prf)
(::) : x -> (Nat -> x) -> (Nat -> x)
(v :: f) 0 = v
(v :: f) (S n) = f n
Succ : NatInf -> NatInf
Succ f = MkNatInf (True :: f .sequence) decr where
decr : Decreasing (True :: f .sequence)
decr 0 = const Oh
decr (S n) = f .isDecreasing n
fromNat : Nat -> NatInf
fromNat 0 = Zero
fromNat (S k) = Succ (fromNat k)
soFromNat : k `LT` n -> So ((fromNat n) .sequence k)
soFromNat p = case view p of
LTZero => Oh
LTSucc p => soFromNat p
fromNatSo : {k, n : Nat} -> So ((fromNat n) .sequence k) -> k `LT` n
fromNatSo {n = 0} hyp = absurd hyp
fromNatSo {k = 0} {n = S n} hyp = LTESucc LTEZero
fromNatSo {k = S k} {n = S n} hyp = LTESucc (fromNatSo hyp)
LTE : (f, g : NatInf) -> Type
f `LTE` g = (n : Nat) -> So (f .sequence n) -> So (g .sequence n)
minimalZ : (f : NatInf) -> fromNat 0 `LTE` f
minimalZ f n prf = absurd prf
maximalInf : (f : NatInf) -> f `LTE` Omega
maximalInf f n prf = Oh
min : (f, g : NatInf) -> NatInf
min (MkNatInf f prf) (MkNatInf g prg)
= MkNatInf (\ n => f n && g n) $ \ n, prfg =>
let (l, r) = soAnd prfg in
andSo (prf n l, prg n r)
minLTE : (f, g : NatInf) -> min f g `LTE` f
minLTE (MkNatInf f prf) (MkNatInf g prg) n pr = fst (soAnd pr)
max : (f, g : NatInf) -> NatInf
max (MkNatInf f prf) (MkNatInf g prg)
= MkNatInf (\ n => f n || g n) $ \ n, prfg =>
orSo $ case soOr prfg of
Left pr => Left (prf n pr)
Right pr => Right (prg n pr)
maxLTE : (f, g : NatInf) -> f `LTE` max f g
maxLTE (MkNatInf f prf) (MkNatInf g prg) n pr = orSo (Left pr)
record ClosenessFunction (0 x : Type) (c : (v, w : x) -> NatInf) where
constructor MkClosenessFunction
selfClose : (v : x) -> c v v === Omega
closeSelf : (v, w : x) -> c v w === Omega -> v === w
symmetric : (v, w : x) -> c v w === c w v
ultrametic : (u, v, w : x) -> min (c u v) (c v w) `LTE` c u w
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Discrete closeness function
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discrete : Type -> Type
Discrete = DecEq
dc : Discrete x => (v, w : x) -> NatInf
dc v w = ifThenElse (isYes $ decEq v w) Omega Zero
dcIsClosenessFunction : Discrete x => ClosenessFunction x PartI.dc
dcIsClosenessFunction
= MkClosenessFunction selfClose closeSelf symmetric ultrametric
where
selfClose : (v : x) -> dc v v === Omega
selfClose v with (decEq v v)
_ | Yes pr = Refl
_ | No npr = absurd (npr Refl)
closeSelf : (v, w : x) -> dc v w === Omega -> v === w
closeSelf v w eq with (decEq v w)
_ | Yes pr = pr
_ | No npr = absurd (cong (($ 0) . sequence) eq)
symmetric : (v, w : x) -> dc v w === dc w v
symmetric v w with (decEq v w)
symmetric v v | Yes Refl = rewrite decEqSelfIsYes {x = v} in Refl
_ | No nprf with (decEq w v)
_ | Yes prf = absurd (nprf (sym prf))
_ | No _ = Refl
ultrametric : (u, v, w : x) -> min (dc u v) (dc v w) `LTE` dc u w
ultrametric u v w n with (decEq u w)
_ | Yes r = const Oh
_ | No nr with (decEq u v)
_ | Yes p with (decEq v w)
_ | Yes q = absurd (nr (trans p q))
_ | No nq = id
_ | No np with (decEq v w)
_ | Yes q = id
_ | No nq = id
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Discrete-sequence closeness function
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
decEqUntil : Discrete x => (n : Nat) -> (f, g : Nat -> x) -> Dec (EqUntil n f g)
decEqUntil n f g = decideLTEBounded (\ n => decEq (f n) (g n)) n
fromYes : (d : Dec p) -> isYes d === True -> p
fromYes (Yes prf) _ = prf
decEqUntilPred :
Discrete x => (n : Nat) -> (f, g : Nat -> x) ->
isYes (decEqUntil (S n) f g) === True ->
isYes (decEqUntil n f g) === True
decEqUntilPred n f g eq with (decEqUntil n f g)
_ | Yes prf = Refl
_ | No nprf = let prf = fromYes (decEqUntil (S n) f g) eq in
absurd (nprf $ \ l, bnd => prf l (lteSuccRight bnd))
public export
dsc : Discrete x => (f, g : Nat -> x) -> NatInf
dsc f g = (MkNatInf Meas decr) where
Meas : Nat -> Bool
Meas = \ n => (ifThenElse (isYes $ decEqUntil n f g) Omega Zero) .sequence n
decr : Decreasing Meas
decr n with (decEqUntil (S n) f g) proof eq
_ | Yes eqSn = rewrite decEqUntilPred n f g (cong isYes eq) in id
_ | No neqSn = \case prf impossible
interface IsSubSingleton x where
isSubSingleton : (v, w : x) -> v === w
IsSubSingleton Void where
isSubSingleton p q = absurd p
IsSubSingleton () where
isSubSingleton () () = Refl
(IsSubSingleton a, IsSubSingleton b) => IsSubSingleton (a, b) where
isSubSingleton (p,q) (u,v) = cong2 (,) (isSubSingleton p u) (isSubSingleton q v)
IsSubSingleton (So b) where
isSubSingleton Oh Oh = Refl
-- K axiom
IsSubSingleton (v === w) where
isSubSingleton Refl Refl = Refl
infix 0 ~~~
0 (~~~) : {0 b : a -> Type} -> (f, g : (x : a) -> b x) -> Type
f ~~~ g = (x : a) -> f x === g x
0 ExtensionalEquality : Type
ExtensionalEquality
= {0 a : Type} -> {0 b : a -> Type} ->
{f, g : (x : a) -> b x} ->
f ~~~ g -> f === g
interface Extensionality where
functionalExt : ExtensionalEquality
{0 p : a -> Type} ->
Extensionality =>
((x : a) -> IsSubSingleton (p x)) =>
IsSubSingleton ((x : a) -> p x) where
isSubSingleton v w = functionalExt (\ x => isSubSingleton (v x) (w x))
-- Extensionality is needed for the No/No case
Extensionality => IsSubSingleton p => IsSubSingleton (Dec p) where
isSubSingleton (Yes p) (Yes q) = cong Yes (isSubSingleton p q)
isSubSingleton (Yes p) (No nq) = absurd (nq p)
isSubSingleton (No np) (Yes q) = absurd (np q)
isSubSingleton (No np) (No nq) = cong No (isSubSingleton np nq)
parameters {auto _ : Extensionality}
seqEquals : {f, g : Nat -> x} -> f ~~~ g -> f === g
seqEquals = functionalExt
decEqUntilSelfIsYes : Discrete x => (n : Nat) -> (f : Nat -> x) ->
decEqUntil n f f === Yes (\ k, bnd => Refl)
decEqUntilSelfIsYes n f = isSubSingleton ? ?
NatInfEquals : {f, g : Nat -> Bool} ->
{fdecr : Decreasing f} ->
{gdecr : Decreasing g} ->
f ~~~ g -> MkNatInf f fdecr === MkNatInf g gdecr
NatInfEquals {f} eq with (seqEquals eq)
_ | Refl = cong (MkNatInf f) (isSubSingleton ? ?)
dscIsClosenessFunction : Discrete x => ClosenessFunction (Nat -> x) PartI.dsc
dscIsClosenessFunction {x}
= MkClosenessFunction
selfClose
(\ v, w, eq => seqEquals (closeSelf v w eq))
(\ v, w => NatInfEquals (symmetric v w))
ultrametric
where
selfClose : (v : Nat -> x) -> dsc v v === Omega
selfClose v = NatInfEquals $ \ n => rewrite decEqUntilSelfIsYes n v in Refl
closeSelf : (v, w : Nat -> x) -> dsc v w === Omega -> v ~~~ w
closeSelf v w eq n with (cong (\ f => f .sequence n) eq)
_ | prf with (decEqUntil n v w)
_ | Yes eqn = eqn n reflexive
_ | No neqn = absurd prf
symmetric : (v, w : Nat -> x) -> (dsc v w) .sequence ~~~ (dsc w v) .sequence
symmetric v w n with (decEqUntil n v w)
_ | Yes p with (decEqUntil n w v)
_ | Yes q = Refl
_ | No nq = absurd (nq $ \ k, bnd => sym (p k bnd))
_ | No np with (decEqUntil n w v)
_ | Yes q = absurd (np $ \ k, bnd => sym (q k bnd))
_ | No nq = Refl
ultrametric : (u, v, w : Nat -> x) -> min (dsc u v) (dsc v w) `LTE` dsc u w
ultrametric u v w n with (decEqUntil n u w)
_ | Yes r = const Oh
_ | No nr with (decEqUntil n u v)
_ | Yes p with (decEqUntil n v w)
_ | Yes q = absurd (nr (\ k, bnd => trans (p k bnd) (q k bnd)))
_ | No nq = id
_ | No np with (decEqUntil n v w)
_ | Yes q = id
_ | No nq = id
closeImpliesEqUntil : Discrete x =>
(n : Nat) -> (f, g : Nat -> x) ->
fromNat (S n) `LTE` dsc f g ->
EqUntil n f g
closeImpliesEqUntil n f g prf with (prf n)
_ | prfn with (decEqUntil n f g)
_ | Yes eqn = eqn
_ | No neqn = absurd (prfn (soFromNat reflexive))
eqUntilImpliesClose : Discrete x =>
(n : Nat) -> (f, g : Nat -> x) ->
EqUntil n f g ->
fromNat (S n) `LTE` dsc f g
eqUntilImpliesClose n f g prf k hyp with (decEqUntil k f g)
_ | Yes p = Oh
_ | No np = let klten = fromLteSucc $ fromNatSo {k} {n = S n} hyp in
absurd (np $ \ k', bnd => prf k' (transitive bnd klten))
buildUp : Discrete x => (n : Nat) -> (f, g : Nat -> x) ->
fromNat n `LTE` dsc f g ->
(v : x) ->
fromNat (S n) `LTE` dsc (v :: f) (v :: g)
buildUp n f g hyp v
= eqUntilImpliesClose n (v :: f) (v :: g)
$ \ k, bnd => case bnd of
LTEZero => Refl
LTESucc bnd => closeImpliesEqUntil ? f g hyp ? bnd
head : (Nat -> x) -> x
head f = f Z
tail : (Nat -> x) -> (Nat -> x)
tail f = f . S
parameters {auto _ : Extensionality}
eta : (f : Nat -> x) -> f === head f :: tail f
eta f = functionalExt $ \case
Z => Refl
S n => Refl
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Continuity and continuously searchable types
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
||| Uniform modulus of continuity
||| @ c the notion of closeness used
||| @ p the predicate of interest
||| @ mod the modulus being characterised
0 IsUModFor : (c : (v, w : x) -> NatInf) -> (p : Pred x) -> (mod : Nat) -> Type
IsUModFor c p mod = (v, w : x) -> fromNat mod `LTE` c v w -> p v -> p w
||| Uniformly continuous predicate wrt a closeness function
||| @ c the notion of closeness used
||| @ p the uniformly continuous predicate
record UContinuous {0 x : Type} (c : (v, w : x) -> NatInf) (p : Pred x) where
constructor MkUC
uModulus : Nat
isUModFor : IsUModFor c p uModulus
||| A type equipped with
||| @ c a notion of closeness
||| is continuously searchable if for any
||| @ p a decidable predicate over that type
||| @ x can be found such that if there exists a
||| @ x0 satisfying p then x also satisfies p
0 IsCSearchable : (x : Type) -> ((v, w : x) -> NatInf) -> Type
IsCSearchable x c
= (0 p : Pred x) -> UContinuous c p -> Decidable p ->
HilbertEpsilon p
interface CSearchable x (0 c : (v, w : x) -> NatInf) where
csearch : IsCSearchable x c
[DEMOTE] Searchable x => CSearchable x c where
csearch p uc pdec = search p pdec
CSearchable Bool (PartI.dc {x = Bool}) where
csearch = csearch @{DEMOTE}
discreteIsUContinuous :
{0 p : Pred x} -> Discrete x =>
Decidable p -> UContinuous PartI.dc p
discreteIsUContinuous pdec = MkUC 1 isUContinuous where
isUContinuous : IsUModFor PartI.dc p 1
isUContinuous v w hyp pv with (decEq v w)
_ | Yes eq = replace {p} eq pv
_ | No neq = absurd (hyp 0 Oh)
[PROMOTE] Discrete x => CSearchable x PartI.dc => Searchable x where
search p pdec = csearch p (discreteIsUContinuous pdec) pdec
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Main result
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Lemma 1
nullModHilbert :
Decidable p -> IsUModFor c p 0 ->
(v : x ** p v) -> (v : x) -> p v
nullModHilbert pdec pmod0 (v0 ** pv0) v = pmod0 v0 v (\ n => absurd) pv0
trivial : UContinuous c (const ())
trivial = MkUC 0 (\ _, _, _, _ => ())
-- Lemma 2
0 tailPredicate : Pred (Nat -> x) -> x -> Pred (Nat -> x)
tailPredicate p v = p . (v ::)
parameters
{0 p : Pred (Nat -> x)}
{auto _ : Discrete x}
(pdec : Decidable p)
decTail : (v : x) -> Decidable (tailPredicate p v)
decTail v vs = pdec (v :: vs)
predModTail :
(mod : Nat) -> IsUModFor PartI.dsc p (S mod) ->
(v : x) -> IsUModFor PartI.dsc (tailPredicate p v) mod
predModTail mod hyp v f g prf pvf
= hyp (v :: f) (v :: g) (buildUp mod f g prf v) pvf
[BYUCONTINUITY] Extensionality =>
Discrete x =>
CSearchable x PartI.dc =>
CSearchable (Nat -> x) (PartI.dsc {x}) where
csearch q quni qdec
= go (search @{PROMOTE})
qdec
(quni .uModulus)
(quni .isUModFor)
where
go : IsSearchable x ->
{0 p : Pred (Nat -> x)} -> Decidable p ->
(n : Nat) -> IsUModFor PartI.dsc p n ->
HilbertEpsilon p
go s pdec 0 hyp
= let f = const (searchableIsInhabited s) in
MkDPair f (\ v0, pv0 => nullModHilbert {c = dsc} pdec hyp (v0 ** pv0) f)
go s pdec (S mod) hyp
= let -- Stepping function generating a tail from the head
stepping : x -> (Nat -> x)
stepping i = fst (go s (decTail pdec i) mod (predModTail pdec mod hyp i))
-- Searching for the head
0 PH : Pred x
PH = \ v => p (v :: stepping v)
pHdec : Decidable PH
pHdec = \ v => pdec (v :: stepping v)
sH : HilbertEpsilon PH
sH = s PH pHdec
-- Searching for the tail given an arbitrary head
0 PT : x -> Pred (Nat -> x)
PT i = tailPredicate p i
pTdec : (v : x) -> Decidable (PT v)
pTdec i = decTail pdec i
sT : (v : x) -> HilbertEpsilon (PT v)
sT i = go s (pTdec i) mod (predModTail pdec mod hyp i)
-- build up the result
v : x; v = sH .fst
vs : Nat -> x; vs = (sT v) .fst
in MkDPair (v :: vs) $ \ vv0s, pvv0s =>
let v0 : x; v0 = head vv0s
v0s : Nat -> x; v0s = tail vv0s
in sH .snd v0
$ (sT v0) .snd v0s
$ replace {p} (eta vv0s) pvv0s
cantorIsCSearchable : Extensionality => IsCSearchable (Nat -> Bool) PartI.dsc
cantorIsCSearchable = csearch @{BYUCONTINUITY}

View File

@ -28,4 +28,6 @@ modules = Data.Container,
Search.Generator,
Search.HDecidable,
Search.Negation,
Search.Properties
Search.Properties,
Search.Tychonoff.PartI

View File

@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ infixr 4 ||
infixr 7 ::, ++
infixl 7 :<
-- Equivalence
infix 0 <=>
-- Functor/Applicative/Monad/Algebra operators
infixl 1 >>=, =<<, >>, >=>, <=<, <&>
infixr 2 <|>

View File

@ -236,6 +236,16 @@ Traversable Maybe where
traverse f Nothing = pure Nothing
traverse f (Just x) = Just <$> f x
-----------------
-- EQUIVALENCE --
-----------------
public export
record (<=>) (a, b : Type) where
constructor MkEquivalence
leftToRight : a -> b
rightToLeft : b -> a
---------
-- DEC --
---------
@ -254,6 +264,11 @@ data Dec : Type -> Type where
export Uninhabited (Yes p === No q) where uninhabited eq impossible
export Uninhabited (No p === Yes q) where uninhabited eq impossible
public export
viaEquivalence : a <=> b -> Dec a -> Dec b
viaEquivalence f (Yes a) = Yes (f .leftToRight a)
viaEquivalence f (No na) = No (na . f .rightToLeft)
------------
-- EITHER --
------------