* [ breaking ] remove parsing of dangling binders
It used to be the case that
```
ID : Type -> Type
ID a = a
test : ID (a : Type) -> a -> a
test = \ a, x => x
```
and
```
head : List $ a -> Maybe a
head [] = Nothing
head (x :: _) = Just x
```
were accepted but these are now rejected because:
* `ID (a : Type) -> a -> a` is parsed as `(ID (a : Type)) -> a -> a`
* `List $ a -> Maybe a` is parsed as `List (a -> Maybe a)`
Similarly if you want to use a lambda / rewrite / let expression as
part of the last argument of an application, the use of `$` or parens
is now mandatory.
This should hopefully allow us to make progress on #1703
Ideally, liftIO would always be linear, but that has lots of knock-on
effects for other monads which we might want to put in HasIO, now that
subtyping is gone. We'll have to revisit this when we have some kind of
multiplicity polymorphism.
It's disappointing to have to do this, but I think necessary because
various issue reports have shown it to be unsound (at least as far as
inference goes) and, at the very least, confusing. This patch brings us
back to the basic rules of QTT.
On the one hand, this makes the 1 multiplicity less useful, because it
means we can't flag arguments as being used exactly once which would be
useful for optimisation purposes as well as precision in the type. On
the other hand, it removes some complexity (and a hack) from
unification, and has the advantage of being correct! Also, I still
consider the 1 multiplicity an experiment.
We can still do interesting things like protocol state tracking, which
is my primary motivation at least.
Ideally, if the 1 multiplicity is going to be more generall useful,
we'll need some kind of way of doing multiplicity polymorphism in the
future. I don't think subtyping is the way (I've pretty much always come
to regret adding some form of subtyping).
Fixes#73 (and maybe some others).
Nipping this historical artifact in the bud before it roots. It's often
useful to be able to `map` directly to the result of a StateT computation
and due to how Functor works this is made harder when the tuple is
(a,state) vs (state,a)
