Fix transaction composition order in History::changes_since (#4981)

* Add a undo/redo split test case for crossing branches

* history: Switch up/down transaction chaining order

The old code tends to work in practice because, usually, either up_txns
or down_txns are empty. When both have contents though, we can run into
a panic trying to compose them all since they will disagree on the
length of the text. This fixes the panic test case in the parent
commit.
This commit is contained in:
Michael Davis 2022-12-02 21:09:08 -06:00 committed by GitHub
parent dc00291b48
commit bcdb475b71
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 26 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ pub fn changes_since(&self, revision: usize) -> Option<Transaction> {
.map(|&n| self.revisions[n].inversion.clone());
let down_txns = down.iter().map(|&n| self.revisions[n].transaction.clone());
up_txns.chain(down_txns).reduce(|acc, tx| tx.compose(acc))
down_txns.chain(up_txns).reduce(|acc, tx| tx.compose(acc))
}
/// Undo the last edit.

View File

@ -161,5 +161,30 @@ async fn test_changes_in_splits_apply_to_all_views() -> anyhow::Result<()> {
))
.await?;
// See <https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/4957>.
// This sequence undoes part of the history and then adds new changes, creating a
// new branch in the history tree. `View::sync_changes` applies transactions down
// and up to the lowest common ancestor in the path between old and new revision
// numbers. If we apply these up/down transactions in the wrong order, this case
// panics.
// The key sequence:
// * 3[<space> Create three empty lines so we are at the end of the document.
// * <C-w>v<C-s> Create a split and save that point at the end of the document
// in the jumplist.
// * <C-w>w Switch back to the first window.
// * uu Undo twice (not three times which would bring us back to the
// root of the tree).
// * 3[<space> Create three empty lines. Now the end of the document is past
// where it was on step 1.
// * <C-w>q Close window 1, focusing window 2 and causing a sync. This step
// panics if we don't apply in the right order.
// * %d Clean up the buffer.
test((
"#[|]#",
"3[<space><C-w>v<C-s><C-w>wuu3[<space><C-w>q%d",
"#[|]#",
))
.await?;
Ok(())
}