From 0f10078f7ece7e372bd6f24d6559d7323d4b7037 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alyssa Ross Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 17:10:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] linuxPackages: clarify comment about downstream kernels I'm pretty sure this is always what we meant, I just didn't think through all the possibilities of non-upstream kernels that might end up being proposed in future. --- pkgs/top-level/linux-kernels.nix | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pkgs/top-level/linux-kernels.nix b/pkgs/top-level/linux-kernels.nix index 8f160bbc4297..62679db1ddcf 100644 --- a/pkgs/top-level/linux-kernels.nix +++ b/pkgs/top-level/linux-kernels.nix @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ in { kernels = recurseIntoAttrs (lib.makeExtensible (self: with self; let callPackage = newScope self; in { - # NOTE: PLEASE DO NOT ADD NEW VENDOR KERNELS TO NIXPKGS. + # NOTE: PLEASE DO NOT ADD NEW DOWNSTREAM KERNELS TO NIXPKGS. # New vendor kernels should go to nixos-hardware instead. # e.g. https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-hardware/tree/master/microsoft/surface/kernel