unfortunately we can't unconditionally make this text markdown without
impacting downstream users of docs generation (as noted in #175586).
hide it entirely until the transition is complete.
mkAliasOptionModule should not default to mdDoc descriptions because
that can break out-of-tree users of documentation infrastructure. add an
explicitly-MD variant for now, to be removed some time after the MD
transition is complete.
Adds initial work towards a `lib.path` library
Originally proposed in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/200718, but has
since gone through some revisions
Co-Authored-By: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
Co-Authored-By: Robert Hensing <robert@roberthensing.nl>
Cross-compilation of anything downstream of gtk3 requires qemu (due to
gobject-introspection) with --target-list=*-linux-user. Without this commit,
those qemu builds will fail on a powerpc64le host due to qemu being configured
with --cpu=powerpc64le instead of --cpu=ppc64le. Unfortunately the build
failure message from qemu in this situation is extremely cryptic.
The root cause turns out not to be the qemu expression, but rather the fact that
on powerpc64le hostPlatform.uname.processor returns the gnu-name (powerpc64le)
for the cpu instead of the linux-name (ppc64le) for the cpu.
uname.processor on mips64el also needs adjustment -- the Linux-name is "mips64"
for both big and little endian (unlike powerpc64, where the Linux-name includes
a "le" suffix):
```
nix@oak:/tmp$ uname -m; lscpu | head -n2
mips64
Architecture: mips64
Byte Order: Little Endian
```
uname.processor on powerpc32 has also been adjusted.
The new derivation should evaluate only if the old derivation does.
Sadly this means that the old derivation cannot depend on the new one
any more, which was used by xorgserver on Darwin. But this is not a
problem as `overrideAttrs` can (and should) usually be used instead.
This change allowed catching an invalid `meta.platforms` in the linux_rpi
kernels, which use `overrideDerivation`.
In the current implementation of Nix, this list would be allocated
over and over. Iirc pennae tried to optimize static list allocation,
but gained no significant performance improvement.
Yes, this function name is inconveniently long, but it is important
for the name to explicitly reference the function and not be mistaken
for the implicit string conversions, which only happen for a smaller
set of values.
