Luflosi
3e076a0b54
linuxPackages.apfs: 0.3.7 -> 0.3.8
...
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs-rw/releases/tag/v0.3.8
2024-03-11 19:17:07 +01:00
Luflosi
2167a49301
linuxPackages.apfs: 0.3.6 -> 0.3.7
...
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs-rw/releases/tag/v0.3.7
2024-01-20 10:21:58 +01:00
Luflosi
9c70148416
linuxPackages.apfs: 0.3.5 -> 0.3.6
...
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs-rw/releases/tag/v0.3.6
2024-01-10 00:51:41 +01:00
Luflosi
53def8b8d1
linuxPackages.apfs: 0.3.4 -> 0.3.5
...
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs-rw/releases/tag/v0.3.5
2023-10-30 22:43:53 +01:00
Luflosi
c873b59121
linuxPackages.apfs: 0.3.3 -> 0.3.4
...
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs-rw/releases/tag/v0.3.4
2023-08-16 13:51:36 +02:00
Sandro
7e38f9e981
Merge pull request #236104 from Luflosi/apfs-test-module-based-runner
...
nixos/tests/apfs: clean up code
2023-06-21 19:19:36 +02:00
Alyssa Ross
a80629ec9d
linuxPackages.apfs: drop obsolete kernel reference
2023-06-13 19:46:48 +00:00
Luflosi
7573c269a8
nixos/tests/apfs: clean up code
...
- Use `runTest` instead of `handleTest`, which simplifies the code a little
- Use `lib.maintainers` instead of `pkgs.lib.maintainers`
- Remove unused function argument `pkgs`
- Change test name in the kernel module from `test` to `apfs`, since that seems to be a common pattern for the name
2023-06-05 16:39:09 +02:00
Luflosi
1622dd9ce4
linuxPackages.apfs: 0.3.2 -> 0.3.3
...
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs-rw/releases/tag/v0.3.3
2023-05-26 12:58:59 +02:00
Luflosi
5405dcffdf
linuxPackages.apfs: 0.3.1 -> 0.3.2
...
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs-rw/releases/tag/v0.3.2
2023-05-26 12:41:54 +02:00
Luflosi
0030956979
linuxPackages.apfs: 0.3.0 -> 0.3.1
...
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs-rw/releases/tag/v0.3.1
2023-04-03 16:16:45 +02:00
Luflosi
eaf43be84c
linuxPackages.apfs: unstable-2022-10-20 -> 0.3.0
...
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs-rw/releases/tag/v0.3.0
I also added a `longDescription` and modified the test to verify the checksum on all metadata nodes now that it works.
2023-01-31 17:35:05 +01:00
Luflosi
732b59e370
linuxPackages.apfs: unstable-2022-08-15 -> unstable-2022-10-20
...
This fixes a compatibility issue with Linux 6.0: e2ca36a76d
2022-12-05 15:21:51 +01:00
Luflosi
be874693ce
linuxPackages.apfs: add passthru.tests
...
This allows executing the test with `nix-build -A linuxPackages.apfs.tests`.
2022-12-05 15:21:25 +01:00
Luflosi
f9b83ece2b
linuxPackages.apfs: unstable-2022-07-24 -> unstable-2022-08-15
...
This fixes a compatibility issue with Linux 5.19: https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs-rw/issues/29 .
2022-08-27 17:51:20 +02:00
Winter
e686431c29
Merge pull request #183369 from Luflosi/update/apfs
2022-08-04 16:59:30 -04:00
Alyssa Ross
6aad09eb5f
linuxPackages.apfs: mark broken on 5.19
2022-08-02 07:11:04 +00:00
Luflosi
d49fc40e4a
linuxPackages.apfs: unstable-2022-02-03 -> unstable-2022-07-24
2022-07-28 17:27:52 +02:00
Alyssa Ross
7b5bd9f719
linuxPackages.apfs: add patch for Linux 5.18
2022-05-23 12:41:48 +00:00
Luflosi
12c54cfaf0
apfs: unstable-2021-09-21 -> unstable-2022-02-03
2022-04-05 18:43:43 +02:00
Nick Cao
07b06a7274
apfs: prepend kernel.makeFlags to makeFlags
2022-03-07 12:23:43 +08:00
Luflosi
5ca61036e6
apfs: unstable-2021-06-25 -> unstable-2021-09-21
2021-09-25 20:24:23 +02:00
Luflosi
fd1c9b5213
apfs: init at unstable-2021-06-25
2021-06-26 11:52:33 +02:00
