the old method of pasting parts of options.json into a markdown document
and hoping for the best no longer works now that options.json contains
more than just docbook. given the infrastructure we have now we can
actually render options.md properly, so we may as well do that.
Provide a module to configure Coqui TTS, available as `tts` in nixpkgs
for a few releases already.
The module supports multiple servers in parallel, so multiple languages
and testing scenarios can be covered, without affecting any production
usage.
The test was failing because it was timing out. Turns out it was waiting
for `foo.kdbx`, which couldn't be "seen" even if it actually existed
(probably some contrast issues with the theme and OCR couldn't find it).
Fixed it by delegating the check to the next screen, where the full path
to the file is displayed in a bigger size. The test seems to pass.
Injecting configuration specific dependencies into the
propagatedBuildInputs of the home-assistant package forces alot of
rebuilds while setting up home-assistant, which is annoying.
By passing optional dependencies into home-assistant via the systemd
units PYTHONPATH environment variable, only he concatenation of
library paths in the systemd unit requires a rebuild.
This also means users can rely heavily on the cached home-assistant
package and will rarely have to build from source, if ever.
Prepare the tests for a change in dependency handling, by not relying on
bespoke files dropped into the package output.
Instead we now check the journal log for whether a configured component
was setup, once for the initial specialisation another time for the one
introducing esphome configuration.
Also improve abstractions for getting journal data relative to a cursor
and generally make a few things more concise.
options processing is pretty slow right now, mostly because the
markdown-it-py parser is pure python (and with performance
pessimizations at that). options parsing *is* embarassingly parallel
though, so we can just fork out all the work to worker processes and
collect the results.
multiprocessing probably has a greater benefit on linux than on darwin
since the worker spawning method darwin uses is less efficient than
fork() on linux. this hasn't been tested on darwin, only on linux, but
if anything darwin will be faster with its preferred method.
